Measuring soil quality dynamics A role for economists, and implications for economic analysis

Measuring soil quality is extremely difficult, yet it has clear economic importance. In particular, there is a great deal of empirical interest in the dynamics of soil quality evolution when land managers respond to policies and other incentives. Yet current methodologies for measuring changes in agricultural land quality are largely static and rely heavily either on incomplete measures such as proxy variables, or ad hoc indexes of selected soil characteristics. Moreover, much empirical work relies on static econometric techniques or simulation models. In this paper, we develop a means to infer soil quality changes from input and output data using a dynamic production function model. Using data from field experiments, we estimate the model in a way that allows the recovery of a dynamic measure of soil quality whose evolution depends on variations in management practices. Our methodology and findings will help provide firmer empirical foundations for analyses of the economic implications of land degradation and the soil quality implications of agricultural policies.

[1]  F. Rhoton,et al.  A soil depth approach to soil quality assessment , 1997 .

[2]  THE EVOLUTION OF AGRICULTURAL SOIL QUALITY: A METHODOLOGY FOR MEASUREMENT AND SOME LAND MARKET IMPLICATIONS , 1997 .

[3]  G. C. van Kooten,et al.  Valuing Trade-Offs between Net Returns and Stewardship Practices: The Case of Soil Conservation in Saskatchewan , 1990 .

[4]  A. Krueger,et al.  Agricultural incentives in developing countries : measuring the effect of sectoral and economywide policies , 1988 .

[5]  Derek Byerlee,et al.  Technical change, productivity and sustainability in irrigated cropping systems of South Asia: Emerging issues in the post-green revolution era , 1992 .

[6]  L. Bundy,et al.  Short-term effects of nitrogen fertilization on soil organic nitrogen availability , 1995 .

[7]  P. Pingali,et al.  Intensification of irrigated rice systems: Learning from the past to meet future challenges , 1995 .

[8]  M. Mausbach,et al.  Soil Quality: A Concept, Definition, and Framework for Evaluation (A Guest Editorial) , 1997 .

[9]  Edward C. Jaenicke,et al.  A Soil‐Quality Index and its Relationship to Efficiency and Productivity Growth Measures: Two Decompositions , 1999 .

[10]  W. E. Larson,et al.  Productivity of soils: Assessing long-term changes due to erosion , 1983 .

[11]  L. Bundy,et al.  Frequency of Nitrogen Fertilizer Carryover in the Humid Midwest , 1994 .

[12]  I. Coxhead,et al.  Recovering soil productivity attributes from experimental data: a statistical method and an application to soil productivity dynamics. , 2000 .

[13]  P. Preckel,et al.  Commodity-Specific Effects of the Conservation Reserve Program , 1988 .

[14]  L. Hansen Farmer Response to Changes in Climate: The Case of Corn Production , 1991 .

[15]  Larry G. Bundy,et al.  Soybean Effects on Soil Nitrogen Availability in Crop Rotations , 1995 .

[16]  I. Coxhead Induced Innovation and Land Degradation in Developing Country Agriculture , 1997 .

[17]  Paul T. Dyke,et al.  The Erosion-Productivity Impact Calculator as Formulated for the Resource Conservation Act Appraisal , 1987 .

[18]  Derek Byerlee,et al.  Productivity Growth and Resource Degradation in Pakistan’s Punjab: A Decomposition Analysis* , 2000, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[19]  G. Umali,et al.  Production risk and optimal fertilizer rates : an application of the Random Coefficient Model , 1985 .

[20]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[21]  I. Coxhead,et al.  Recovering a Soil Quality Measure from Crop Trials Data: A Dynamic Econometric Method , 1997 .

[22]  R. Papendick,et al.  Using Multiple‐Variable Indicator Kriging for Evaluating Soil Quality , 1993 .

[23]  O. R. Burt Farm Level Economics of Soil Conservation in the Palouse Area of the Northwest , 1981 .