Radiation dose reduction in paediatric cranial CT

Background. There is no consensus about the optimal milliamperage-second (mAs) settings for computed tomography (CT). Most operators follow the recommended settings of the manufacturers, but these may not be the most appropriate settings. Objective. To determine whether a lower radiation dose technique could be used in CT of the paediatric brain without jeopardising the diagnostic accuracy of the images. Materials and methods. A randomised prospective trial. A group of 53 children underwent CT using manufacturer's default levels of 200 or 250 mAs; 47 underwent scanning at 125 or 150 mAs. Anatomical details and the confidence level in reaching a diagnosis were evaluated by two radiologists in a double-blinded manner using a 4-point scoring system. Results. For both readers there was no statistically significant difference in the confidence level for reaching a diagnosis between the two groups. The 95 % confidence intervals and P values were –0.9–1.1 and 0.13 (reader 1) and –1.29–1.37 and 0.70 (reader 2), respectively. Reliability tests showed the results were consistent. Conclusions. The recommended level may not be the optimum setting. Dose reduction of 40 % is possible on our system in paediatric brain CT without affecting the diagnostic quality of the images.

[1]  J. Mccrohan,et al.  Average radiation dose in standard CT examinations of the head: results of the 1990 NEXT survey. , 1992, Radiology.

[2]  R. Gagne,et al.  Average radiation doses in a standard head examination for 250 CT systems. , 1987, Radiology.

[3]  T. Fearon,et al.  Normalized pediatric organ-absorbed doses from CT examinations. , 1987, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  J. J. Broerse,et al.  Survey of CT techniques and absorbed dose in various Dutch hospitals. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[5]  B. Wall,et al.  The Increasing Importance of X Ray Computed Tomography as a Source of Medical Exposure , 1995 .

[6]  R. Doll,et al.  Hazards of ionising radiation: 100 years of observations on man. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  T. Fearon,et al.  Pediatric patient exposures from CT examinations: GE CT/T 9800 scanner. , 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  K S Pentlow,et al.  Radiation dose in CT. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[9]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[10]  J. Haaga,et al.  The effect of mAs variation upon computed tomography image quality as evaluated by in vivo and in vitro studies. , 1981, Radiology.

[11]  P. Shrimpton,et al.  CT--an increasingly important slice of the medical exposure of patients. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  R. Hoover,et al.  Diagnostic x-ray procedures and risk of leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma. , 1991, JAMA.