Human Factors Research in Patient Safety: A Candid Assessment

Five panelists, playing active research roles in the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's patient safety research initiative, present their views on challenges to human factors research for enhancing patient safety. Bogner advocates a systems structure for linking the findings of various research projects so that the missing pieces of the patient safety puzzle can serve as fruitful targets for subsequent research. Carayon adopts a macroergonomic framework for designing interventions to clinical work systems while Cook focuses on the complexity that underlies configurable clinical devices. With respect to anesthesia and critical care, Weinger cites the successful use of task analysis, workload assessment, and video analysis, yet notes challenges regarding concerns about patient privacy, disruption of patient care, and cultural barriers. Xiao cites impressive HF/E work on team coordination and performance shaping factors and sees the need for greater use of video and information technology to improve institutional learning and coordination of patient care.

[1]  T. Brennan,et al.  Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I* , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[2]  E. Schimmel The hazards of hospitalization* , 2003, Annals of internal medicine.

[3]  Hal W. Hendrick,et al.  Macroergonomics: An Introduction to Work System Design , 2000 .

[4]  P Carayon,et al.  Work organization and ergonomics. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[6]  Colin F. Mackenzie,et al.  SPECIAL SECTION: Task Complexity in Emergency Medical Care and Its Implications for Team Coordination , 1996, Hum. Factors.

[7]  Peter Neumann,et al.  Safeware: System Safety and Computers , 1995, SOEN.

[8]  T. Ganiats Human Error in Medicine , 1995 .

[9]  T. Brennan,et al.  The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Matthew B. Weinger,et al.  Ergonomic and Human Factors Affecting Anesthetic Vigilance and Monitoring Performance in the Operating Room Environment , 1990, Anesthesiology.

[11]  Captain H. C. Alger Cockpit resource management. , 1989, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[12]  Pascale C. Sainfort,et al.  A balance theory of job design for stress reduction , 1989 .

[13]  J. E. Groves,et al.  Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .

[14]  D. Norman,et al.  New technology and human error , 1989 .

[15]  R H Brook,et al.  Preventable deaths: who, how often, and why? , 1988, Annals of internal medicine.

[16]  D. Gaba,et al.  A comprehensive anesthesia simulation environment: re-creating the operating room for research and training. , 1988, Anesthesiology.

[17]  P. Maurette,et al.  [To err is human: building a safer health system]. , 2002, Annales francaises d'anesthesie et de reanimation.

[18]  David Woods,et al.  Cognitive consequences of clumsy automation on high workload, high consequence human performance , 1991 .

[19]  J. Shaoul Human Error , 1973, Nature.