This study compares microfluidic technology (Protein 200 LabChip® Assay kit, Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, referred to here as Protein 200) to the traditional approach for protein analysis, one‐dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE), for the sizing and quantification of immunoglobulin G (IgG) in hybridoma cell cultures. Internal references differ between each method: purified IgG was used alone in SDS‐PAGE while myosin (the upper marker) was added to each sample in Protein 200. The IgG used here were produced in cultures propagated in either a serum‐free or a serum‐containing medium. With serum‐containing samples, there was a significant difference in the IgG concentrations (p < 0.05) between SDS‐PAGE and Protein 200. The concentration determined by SDS‐PAGE was significantly higher (> 30%) than by Protein 200 or by high‐pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) because the large amounts of serum albumin in the samples affect the accuracy of SDS‐PAGE. Protein 200 can determine size similarly to SDS‐PAGE in serum‐free samples (standard error of the mean, SEM, < 1%, 95% confidence < ±1%), unlike in serum‐containing samples. The Protein 200 assay was more effective than the traditional one‐dimensional SDS‐PAGE in determining concentration and size of IgG in cell culture samples and it provided a miniaturized and convenient platform for rapid analysis.