Synthesis through meta-ethnography: paradoxes, enhancements, and possibilities

Despite theoretical differences and methodological questions, the conversation about synthesizing qualitative research raises interest. Meta-ethnography, as initially described by Noblit and Hare (1988), is a foundation for a methodology to synthesize existing case study; however, there are weaknesses that need to be addressed. Using three stages of meta-ethnography, case selection, analysis, and synthesis, the author discusses these weaknesses and provides enhancements so that meta-ethnography becomes a viable option for qualitative researchers. Examples from application in the study of educational leadership illuminate and validate each enhancement. The author concludes by discussing how, when enhancements are made, meta-ethnography also becomes a methodology with compelling implications for making the research process a more democratic one.

[1]  Carl Grant Hoefs-Bascom,et al.  After The School Bell Rings , 1986 .

[2]  Tom Carney.  Fourth Generation Evaluation , 1991 .

[3]  Elliot W. Eisner,et al.  Concerns and aspirations for qualitative research in the new millennium , 2001 .

[4]  H. Bernard,et al.  Data Management and Analysis Methods , 2000 .

[5]  M Sandelowski,et al.  Focus on qualitative methods. Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. , 1997, Research in nursing & health.

[6]  David R. Krathwohl,et al.  Methods of Educational and Social Science Research: An Integrated Approach , 1992 .

[7]  M. Lecompte,et al.  Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research , 1984 .

[8]  C. Glickman.  Renewing America's Schools: A Guide for School-Based Action , 1993 .

[9]  M. Hammersley.  What's Wrong With Ethnography?: Methodological Explorations , 1992 .

[10]  H. Cooper.  Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews , 1998 .

[11]  Jesse Goodman,et al.  Elementary Schooling for Critical Democracy , 1992 .

[12]  Gretchen B. Rossman.  Building Explanations across Case Studies: A Framework for Synthesis. , 1993 .

[13]  G. Glass.  Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research1 , 1976 .

[14]  Threads of a New Language: A Response to Eisenhart’s ‘On the Subject of Interpretive Review’ , 1998 .

[15]  Ulrich Reitzug,et al.  "Miss Lincoln doesn't Teach here": A Descriptive Narrative and Conceptual Analysis of a Principal's Symbolic Leadership Behavior , 1992 .

[16]  Satinder P. Singh,et al.  Introduction , 2002, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[17]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  The Interpretive Review of Educational Matters: Is There Any Other Kind? , 1998 .

[18]  M. Eisenhart,et al.  On the Subject of Interpretive Reviews1 , 1998 .

[19]  R. Yin,et al.  Using the Case Survey Method To Analyze Policy Studies. , 1975 .

[20]  C. Geertz.  Local Knowledge: Further Essays In Interpretive Anthropology , 1983 .

[21]  D. Fetterman.  Speaking the language of power : communication, collaboration, and advocacy (translating ethnography into action) , 1993 .

[22]  Henry A. Giroux.  Theory and Resistance in Education: A Pedagogy for the Opposition , 1983 .

[23]  Peter McLaren.  Life in Schools: An Introduction to Critical Pedagogy in the Foundations of Education , 1989 .

[24]  F. Michael Connelly,et al.  Personal experience methods. , 1994 .

[25]  S. Lightfoot,et al.  The Good High School--Portraits of Character and Culture. , 1985 .

[26]  Louis M. Smith.  The Fate of an innovative school : the history and present status of the Kensington School , 1987 .

[27]  W. Firestone.  Alternative Arguments for Generalizing From Data as Applied to Qualitative Research , 1993 .

[28]  J. Dewey.  Democracy and education : an introduction to the philosophy of education , 1961 .

[29]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[30]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Case Study Research in Education : A Qualitative Approach , 1991 .

[31]  F. Murray,et al.  Call for Manuscripts: Review of Educational Research, 1994–1996 , 1994 .

[32]  Lynn H. Doyle.  A Framework for Examining School Leadership and Teaching in Varied Organizations and Social Contexts: A Synthesis. , 1998 .

[33]  M. Fine.  Working the hyphens: Reinventing self and other in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[34]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[35]  A. Keller.  Inside the Man in the Principal's Office. , 1974 .

[36]  Kenneth A. Strike,et al.  Types of synthesis and their criteria , 1983 .

[37]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Fighting Familiarity: Essays on Education and Ethnography , 1995 .

[38]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[39]  Brian Rowan.  Learning, Teaching, and Educational Administration: Toward a Research Agenda , 1995 .

[40]  J. Schofield.  Increasing the generalizability of qualitative research. , 1993 .

[41]  G. Noblit,et al.  Meta-Ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies , 1988 .