Monophasic action potentials and activation recovery intervals as measures of ventricular action potential duration: experimental evidence to resolve some controversies.

BACKGROUND Activation recovery intervals (ARIs) and monophasic action potential (MAP) duration are used as measures of action potential duration in beating hearts. However, controversies exist concerning the correct way to record MAPs or calculate ARIs. We have addressed these issues experimentally. OBJECTIVES To experimentally address the controversies concerning the correct way to record MAPs or calculate ARIs. METHODS Left ventricular local electrograms were recorded in isolated pig hearts with an exploring electrode grid, with a KCl reference electrode on the left ventricular myocardium, the aortic root, or the left atrium. Local activation was determined from calculated Laplacian electrograms. RESULTS With the KCl electrode on the aortic root, local electrograms represented local activation. However, with the KCl electrode on the myocardium remote from the exploring electrode, a combined electrogram emerged consisting of local activation recorded from the grid and remote activation recorded from the reference electrode. The remote, inverted monophasic component did not show propagation and did not correlate with the Laplacian complex. When the KCl electrode was placed on the atrium during AV block, remote atrial monophasic components were completely dissociated from local, ventricular deflections. At left ventricular sites with a positive T wave, the Laplacian signal showed that the end of the T wave was caused by remote repolarization. During cooling-induced regional action potential prolongation, the T wave became negative, whereby the positive flank of the T wave remained correlated with repolarization (recorded with a MAP at the same site). CONCLUSIONS MAPs are recorded from the depolarizing electrode. In both negative and positive T waves, the moment of maximum dV/dt corresponds to local repolarization.

[1]  Doris A Taylor,et al.  Genesis of the monophasic action potential: role of interstitial resistance and boundary gradients. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[2]  T A Johnson,et al.  Distribution of extracellular potassium and its relation to electrophysiologic changes during acute myocardial ischemia in the isolated perfused porcine heart. , 1988, Circulation.

[3]  Cornelis A. Grimbergen,et al.  Software design for analysis of multichannel intracardial and body surface electrocardiograms , 2002, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[4]  C. Antzelevitch,et al.  Transmural Heterogeneity of Ventricular Repolarization Under Baseline and Long QT Conditions in the Canine Heart In Vivo: Torsades de Pointes Develops with Halothane but not Pentobarbital Anesthesia , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[5]  B M Steinhaus,et al.  Estimating Cardiac Transmembrane Activation and Recovery Times From Unipolar and Bipolar Extracellular Electrograms: A Simulation Study , 1989, Circulation research.

[6]  M R Franz,et al.  Long-term recording of monophasic action potentials from human endocardium. , 1983, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  S. Olsson Monophasic action potentials of right heart : suction electrode method in clinical investigations , 1971 .

[8]  H. Tan,et al.  Role of Ca2+-activated Cl- current during proarrhythmic early afterdepolarizations in sheep and human ventricular myocytes. , 2003, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  J. Fleischhauer,et al.  Electrical resistances of interstitial and microvascular space as determinants of the extracellular electrical field and velocity of propagation in ventricular myocardium. , 1995, Circulation.

[10]  M. Franz,et al.  What is a monophasic action potential recorded by the Franz contact electrode? , 2005, Cardiovascular research.

[11]  Kenneth M. Moser,et al.  Epicardial Activation and Repolarization Patterns in Patients With Right Ventricular Hypertrophy* , 1991, Circulation.

[12]  Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar,et al.  Increased ventricular repolarization heterogeneity in patients with ventricular arrhythmia vulnerability and cardiomyopathy: a human in vivo study. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[13]  R. Lux,et al.  Correlation between in vivo transmembrane action potential durations and activation-recovery intervals from electrograms. Effects of interventions that alter repolarization time. , 1990, Circulation.

[14]  B. Surawicz,et al.  Comparison of cardiac monophasic action potentials recorded by intracellular and suction electrodes. , 1959, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  A. Yue,et al.  Determination of Human Ventricular Repolarization by Noncontact Mapping: Validation With Monophasic Action Potential Recordings , 2004, Circulation.

[16]  Charles Antzelevitch,et al.  Cellular basis for the monophasic action potential. Which electrode is the recording electrode? , 2002, Cardiovascular research.

[17]  Edward J Vigmond,et al.  The electrophysiological basis of MAP recordings. , 2005, Cardiovascular research.

[18]  C Antzelevitch,et al.  Transmural dispersion of repolarization and arrhythmogenicity: the Brugada syndrome versus the long QT syndrome. , 1999, Journal of electrocardiology.

[19]  L Gepstein,et al.  Activation-repolarization coupling in the normal swine endocardium. , 1997, Circulation.

[20]  R. Coronel,et al.  Laplacian Electrograms and the Interpretation of Complex Ventricular Activation Patterns During Ventricular Fibrillation , 2000, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.