Training 2;6-year-olds to produce the transitive construction: the role of frequency, semantic similarity and shared syntactic distribution.

Childers and Tomasello (2001) found that training 2 1/2-year-olds on the English transitive construction greatly improves their performance on a post-test in which they must use novel verbs in that construction. In the current study, we replicated Childers and Tomasello's finding, but using a much lower frequency of transitive verbs and models in training. We also used novel verbs that were of a different semantic class to our training verbs, demonstrating that semantic homogeneity is not crucial for generalization. We also replicated the finding that 4-year-olds are significantly more productive than 2 1/2-year-olds with the transitive construction, with the new finding that this is also true for verbs of emission. In addition, 'shared syntactic distribution' of novel verb and training verbs was found to have no observable effect on the number of 2 1/2-year-olds who were productive in the post-test.

[1]  Gary M. Olson,et al.  The Development of Infant Memory , 1984 .

[2]  Steven Pinker,et al.  Productivity and constraints in the acquisition of the passive , 1987, Cognition.

[3]  J. Chafetz,et al.  Verb-based versus class-based accounts of actionality effects in children's comprehension of passives , 1990, Cognition.

[4]  Patricia J. Bauer,et al.  Holding it all together: How enabling relations facilitate young children's event recall ☆ , 1992 .

[5]  P. Bauer,et al.  Constructing event representations: Building on a foundation of variation and enabling relations , 1992 .

[6]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Regular morphology and the lexicon. , 1995 .

[7]  Julian M. Pine,et al.  Modelling the acquisition of syntactic categories , 1997 .

[8]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Differential productivity in young children's use of nouns and verbs , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[9]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Rethinking infant knowledge: toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. , 1997, Psychological review.

[10]  J. Pine,et al.  Lexically-based learning and early grammatical development , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[11]  J. Elman.  Generalization , simple recurrent networks , and the emergence of structure , 1998 .

[12]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic Persistence in Dutch , 1998, Language and speech.

[13]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Young children learn to produce passives with nonce verbs. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[14]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  Chapter 4: A dynamic usage-based model , 1999 .

[15]  N. Akhtar,et al.  Acquiring basic word order: evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure , 1999, Journal of Child Language.

[16]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Structural Priming as Implicit Learning: A Comparison of Models of Sentence Production , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[17]  M. Tomasello.  Do young children have adult syntactic competence? , 2000, Cognition.

[18]  Edith L. Bavin,et al.  Infants of 24-30 Months Understand Verb Frames , 2000 .

[19]  Jane B. Childers,et al.  The role of pronouns in young children's acquisition of the English transitive construction. , 2001, Developmental psychology.

[20]  J. Pine,et al.  Chunking mechanisms in human learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  M. Tomasello,et al.  What preschool children do and do not do with ungrammatical word orders , 2001 .

[22]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Testing the abstractness of children's linguistic representations: lexical and structural priming of syntactic constructions in young children. , 2003, Developmental science.