Validation of the Auto-Inflammatory Diseases Activity Index (AIDAI) for hereditary recurrent fever syndromes

Objectives To validate the Auto-Inflammatory Diseases Activity Index (AIDAI) in the four major hereditary recurrent fever syndromes (HRFs): familial Mediterranean fever (FMF), mevalonate kinase deficiency (MKD), tumour necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) and cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS). Methods In 2010, an international collaboration established the content of a disease activity tool for HRFs. Patients completed a 1-month prospective diary with 12 yes/no items before a clinical appointment during which their physician assessed their disease activity by a questionnaire. Eight international experts in auto-inflammatory diseases evaluated the patient's disease activity by a blinded web evaluation and a nominal group technique consensus conference, with their consensus judgement considered the gold standard. Sensitivity/specificity/accuracy measures and the ability of the score to discriminate active from inactive patients via the best cut-off score were calculated by a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results Consensus was achieved for 98/106 (92%) cases (39 FMF, 35 CAPS, 14 TRAPS and 10 MKD), with 26 patients declared as having inactive disease and 72 as having active disease. The median total AIDAI score was 14 (range=0–175). An AIDAI cut-off score ≥9 discriminated active from inactive patients, with sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 89%/92%/90%, respectively, and an area under the curve of 98% (95% CI 96% to 100%). Conclusions The AIDAI score is a valid and simple tool for assessing disease activity in FMF/MKD/TRAPS/CAPS. This tool is easy to use in clinical practice and has the potential to be used as the standard efficacy measure in future clinical trials.

[1]  S. Özen,et al.  Treatment of autoinflammatory diseases: results from the Eurofever Registry and a literature review , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  M. Weisman,et al.  Rilonacept for Colchicine-Resistant or -Intolerant Familial Mediterranean Fever , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  M. Gattorno,et al.  The autoinflammatory diseases. , 2012, Swiss medical weekly.

[4]  C. Wouters,et al.  An International registry on Autoinflammatory diseases: the Eurofever experience , 2012, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[5]  S. Ozen,et al.  The Eurofever Project: towards better care for autoinflammatory diseases , 2011, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[6]  A. Martini,et al.  Networking in paediatrics: the example of the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organisation (PRINTO) , 2011, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[7]  J. Pouchot,et al.  Extended Report , 2022 .

[8]  B. Wolska-Kuśnierz,et al.  Periodic fever syndromes in Eastern and Central European countries: results of a pediatric multinational survey , 2010, Pediatric rheumatology online journal.

[9]  A. Martini,et al.  Evaluation of 21-Numbered Circle and 10-Centimeter Horizontal Line Visual Analog Scales for Physician and Parent Subjective Ratings in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis , 2010, The Journal of Rheumatology.

[10]  M. McDermott,et al.  Rilonacept in the management of cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS) , 2010, Journal of inflammation research.

[11]  P. Hawkins,et al.  Use of canakinumab in the cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  G. Yancopoulos,et al.  Efficacy and safety of rilonacept (interleukin-1 Trap) in patients with cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes: results from two sequential placebo-controlled studies. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  T. Pincus,et al.  Visual analog scales in formats other than a 10 centimeter horizontal line to assess pain and other clinical data. , 2008, The Journal of rheumatology.

[14]  A. Martini,et al.  Consensus procedures and their role in pediatric rheumatology , 2008, Current rheumatology reports.

[15]  A. Griffiths,et al.  Development, validation, and evaluation of a pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index: a prospective multicenter study. , 2007, Gastroenterology.

[16]  M. Dougados,et al.  Development of classification and response criteria for rheumatic diseases. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[17]  S. Bae,et al.  The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization/American College of Rheumatology provisional criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: prospective validation of the definition of improvement. , 2006, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[18]  K. Minden,et al.  The Pediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization criteria for the evaluation of response to therapy in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus: prospective validation of the disease activity core set. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[19]  P. Lachenbruch,et al.  International consensus on preliminary definitions of improvement in adult and juvenile myositis. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[20]  W. Kuis,et al.  Preliminary core sets of measures for disease activity and damage assessment in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus and juvenile dermatomyositis. , 2003, Rheumatology.

[21]  A. Martini,et al.  Performance of the preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile chronic arthritis patients treated with methotrexate , 1998, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[22]  D. Felson,et al.  Preliminary definition of improvement in juvenile arthritis. , 1997, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[23]  J J Anderson,et al.  American College of Rheumatology. Preliminary definition of improvement in rheumatoid arthritis. , 1995, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[24]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[25]  David H. Gustafson,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes , 1976 .

[26]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Group Techniques for Program Planning , 1975 .