Robust product development by combining engineering design and designed experiments

Many successful industrial companies aim at improving product development in order to be competitive. This thesis is intended to make a contribution to the work of fulfilling this goal. Rapid advances in technology in recent years have set new demands on product development. As a consequence, an increasing variety of products are built on heterogeneous technologies. Such products incorporate a mixture of technologies, often combinations of computer, electrical, and mechanical systems. Specialists from different engineering disciplines must co-operate to a greater extent than before in order to understand the products. Increased cooperation and heterogeneous technologies in products set high demands on communication and systems integration if product development is to deliver products with high quality, short lead times, and low cost. This thesis presents research that advocates tools and methods for performancerelated robustness improvements in product development. Robust products, or subsystems, are insensitive to disturbances and perform well under a wide range of conditions. It is found that robustness in product development increases multidisciplinary optimization, communication, and systems integration. Thus, robustness provides a solution to a number of important questions relating to systems integration and communication in product development. The presented research consists of both theory development and practical implementations. The research in the appended papers provides: (1) a tool for customizing and designing company unique strategies; (2) an approach to problem solving and quality-related performance improvements by combining design object analysis with Axiomatic Design, Quality Control tools, and designed experiments; (3) equations for computing the Information content in decoupled design solutions; (4) equations for evaluating Quality Loss in Axiomatic Design; (5) a feature selection technique to improve robust classification in the multivariate domain; (6) a comparative study of two experimental methods for robustness improvements. Two of the presented studies have been carried out in industry and the results have been implemented successfully. The remaining four studies were performed in an academic environment, although the results and simulations indicate industrial relevance when applied to real-life problems.

[1]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis. , 1967 .

[2]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[3]  W. Edwards Deming,et al.  Out of the Crisis , 1982 .

[4]  M. Mcgrath Product Strategy for High Technology Companies , 2000 .

[5]  Altshuller Creativity As an Exact Science , 1984 .

[6]  M. Porter Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[7]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  On the Use of Statistics in Design and the Implications for Deterministic Computer Experiments , 1997 .

[8]  Steven C. Wheelwright,et al.  Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality , 1992 .

[9]  Rajesh Jugulum,et al.  TAGUCHI METHODS IN AMERICAN UNIVERSITIES AND CORPORATIONS , 2001 .

[10]  Jeffrey K. Liker,et al.  Concurrent Engineering Effectiveness: Integrating Product Development Across Organizations , 1997 .

[11]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The core competence of the corporation’, Harvard Business Review, Vol. pp. . , 1990 .

[12]  J. Bransen The Philosophy of Social Science. An Introduction , 1996 .

[13]  Eswaran Subrahmanian,et al.  Shared memory in design: A unifying theme for research and practice , 1992 .

[14]  Edward B. Magrab,et al.  Integrated product and process design and development : the product realization process , 2009 .

[15]  Richard G. Lipsey,et al.  An introduction to positive economics , 1963 .

[16]  Eberhardt Rechtin,et al.  The Art of Systems Architecting, Second Edition , 2000 .

[17]  Derek J. Pike,et al.  Empirical Model‐building and Response Surfaces. , 1988 .

[18]  A. Thakor,et al.  How Do You Win the Capital Allocation Game , 1998 .

[19]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Robust Design Approach for Achieving Flexibility in Multidisciplinary Design , 1999 .

[20]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments , 1995 .

[21]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  A Theory of Complexity, Periodicity and the Design Axioms , 1999 .

[22]  D. L. Marples,et al.  THE DECISIONS OF ENGINEERING DESIGN , 1961, IRE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[23]  D. V. Steward,et al.  The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[24]  P. Kotler Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control , 1972 .

[25]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Evaluation of design process alternatives using signal flow graphs , 2000 .

[26]  Truong Q. Nguyen,et al.  Wavelets and filter banks , 1996 .

[27]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  A model for synchronous collaborative design using CAD and database management , 1997 .

[28]  田口 玄一,et al.  On-line quality control during production , 1981 .

[29]  Gunnar Erixon Modular function deployment , 1998 .

[30]  David Robert Wilson An exploratory study of complexity in axiomatic design , 1980 .

[31]  Peder Andersson A Process Approach to Robust Design in Early Engineering Design Phases , 1996 .

[32]  S. Robbins Essentials of Organizational Behavior , 1984 .

[33]  田口 玄一,et al.  System of experimental design : engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize costs , 1987 .

[34]  D. Johnson,et al.  NetBuilder: an environment for integrating tools and people , 1998, Comput. Aided Des..

[35]  Glenn H. Mazur,et al.  Hoshin Kanri, policy deployment for successful TQM , 1991 .

[36]  T. Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd edition , 1970 .

[37]  Nicola Senin,et al.  Integrated design in a service marketplace , 2000, Comput. Aided Des..

[38]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[39]  Laurie A. Williams,et al.  Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming , 2000, IEEE Softw..

[40]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[41]  G. Derringer,et al.  Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables , 1980 .

[42]  Nam P. Suh,et al.  On an Axiomatic Approach to Manufacturing and Manufacturing Systems , 1978 .

[43]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  Statistics for Experimenters: An Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and Model Building. , 1979 .

[44]  Yoji Akao,et al.  Quality Function Deployment : Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design , 1990 .

[45]  N. F. M. Roozenburg,et al.  Product design: Fundamentals and methods , 1996 .

[46]  Genichi Taguchi System Of Experimental Design: Engineering Methods To Optimize Quality And Minimize Costs , 1987 .

[47]  Michael E. McGrath,et al.  Setting the PACE in product development : a guide to product and cycle-time excellence , 1996 .

[48]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Systematic IPT integration in lean development programs , 1996 .

[49]  Kathryn Graziano The innovator's dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail , 1998 .

[50]  J. B. Quinn,et al.  STRATEGIC OUTSOURCING: LEVERAGING KNOWLEDGE CAPABILITIES , 1999 .

[51]  Ke Te Le Mei Ru He Deng Yi Marketing management: analysis. planning. implementation and control , 2000 .

[52]  Genichi Taguchi,et al.  Taguchi on Robust Technology Development: Bringing Quality Engineering Upstream , 1992 .

[53]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[54]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Integration analysis of product decompositions , 1994 .

[55]  Don Clausing,et al.  Total Quality Development , 1993 .

[56]  Willard Van Orman Quine,et al.  From a Logical Point of View , 1955 .

[57]  W. Quine The two dogmas of empiricism , 1951 .

[58]  田口 玄一,et al.  Taguchi on robust technology development : bringing quality engineering upstream , 1993 .

[59]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and Refutations , 1963 .

[60]  P. Ghemawat Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy , 1991 .

[61]  Bianca Falcidieno,et al.  Design and engineering process integration through a multiple view intermediate modeller in a distributed object-oriented system environment , 1998, Comput. Aided Des..

[62]  Frank R. Abate The Oxford desk dictionary and thesaurus , 1997 .

[63]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Reflecting on the Strategy Process , 1999 .

[64]  Arnoldo C. Hax,et al.  The Strategy Concept and Process: A Pragmatic Approach , 1991 .

[65]  David S. Cochran,et al.  Manufacturing System Design , 1998 .

[66]  K. Narasimhan Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction , 2003 .

[67]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Engineering design methods , 1989 .

[68]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Process Improvement Simultations using the Work Transformation Model , 1999 .

[69]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[70]  R. Stake A hierarchical classification of the reasons for dividing products into modules : a theoretical analysis of module drivers , 1999 .

[71]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .