Real-time text message surveys reveal student perceptions of personnel resources throughout a course-based research experience

Course-based research experiences (CREs) are designed to engage students in authentic scientific experiences that are embedded into a standard curriculum. CREs provide valuable research experiences to large numbers of undergraduate biology students, however, CRE implementation can require many personnel. Because limited personnel may be a barrier to widespread CRE implementation, our goal was to discover which personnel students valued throughout a CRE and the ways they were valuable. We investigated students’ perceptions of personnel resources throughout a semester-long CRE using two survey approaches. Using a text message survey administered multiple times per week, real-time data was collected about which personnel resource students perceived to be the most helpful. Using a web-based survey administered five times throughout the semester, retrospective data was collected about how often students used each personnel resource and how helpful students perceived each personnel resource to be. Graduate teaching assistants (TAs) were consistently selected as the most helpful personnel resource by the majority of respondents throughout the semester, with most respondents describing graduate TAs providing project-specific feedback. Although less frequently, undergraduate TAs were also consistently selected as the most helpful personnel resource. Respondents described undergraduate TAs providing project-specific feedback, general feedback, and project-specific resources. Data from the retrospective, web-based survey largely mirrored the real-time, text message survey data. Throughout the semester, most respondents reported using graduate TAs “Often” or “Always” and that graduate TAs were “Very” or “Extremely” helpful. Throughout most of the semester, most respondents also reported using undergraduate TAs “Often” or “Always” and that undergraduate TAs were “Very” or “Extremely” helpful. The results of this descriptive study underscore the importance of graduate and undergraduate TAs in the development and implementation of CREs, emphasizing the need for departments and course coordinators to be intentional in planning TA training that prepares TAs to fulfill their critical role in CRE implementation.

[1]  Jennifer S. Stanford,et al.  Course-based undergraduate research experiences are a viable approach to increase access to research experiences in biology , 2021, Journal of Biological Education.

[2]  Jessamina E. Blum,et al.  Open Inquiry versus Broadly Relevant Short-Term Research Experiences for Non-Biology Majors† , 2021, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[3]  Julie C. Brown,et al.  Building Excellence in Scientific Teaching: How Important Is the Evidence for Evidence-Based Teaching when Training STEM TAs? , 2021, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[4]  S. Cotner,et al.  Leveraging public data to offer online inquiry opportunities , 2020, Ecology and evolution.

[5]  Sarah Pickett,et al.  Fear of the CURE: A Beginner’s Guide to Overcoming Barriers in Creating a Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience† , 2020, Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education.

[6]  Jeffrey T. Olimpo,et al.  Characterization of Instructor and Student Behaviors in CURE and Non-CURE Learning Environments: Impacts on Student Motivation, Science Identity Development, and Perceptions of the Laboratory Experience , 2020, CBE life sciences education.

[7]  S. Cotner,et al.  Computer-Based and Bench-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Produce Similar Attitudinal Outcomes , 2019, CBE life sciences education.

[8]  Jan Feld,et al.  Are Professors Worth It? , 2018, The Journal of Human Resources.

[9]  D. Hanauer,et al.  Short-Term Research Experience (SRE) in the Traditional Lab: Qualitative and Quantitative Data on Outcomes , 2018, CBE life sciences education.

[10]  Nancy Pelaez,et al.  The Need to Be Sure About CUREs: Discovery and Relevance as Critical Elements of CUREs for Nonmajors , 2018, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[11]  Tamara J Brenner,et al.  Preparing graduate student teaching assistants in the sciences: An intensive workshop focused on active learning , 2018, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[12]  Jessamina E. Blum,et al.  Discovery and Broad Relevance May Be Insignificant Components of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) for Non-Biology Majors † , 2018, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[13]  C. J. Fong,et al.  Examining the impact of four teaching development programmes for engineering teaching assistants* , 2017 .

[14]  Jessamina E. Blum,et al.  A Call to Develop Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) for Nonmajors Courses , 2017, CBE life sciences education.

[15]  Jeffrey T. Olimpo,et al.  Development and Evaluation of the Tigriopus Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience: Impacts on Students’ Content Knowledge, Attitudes, and Motivation in a Majors Introductory Biology Course , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[16]  Lorelei E. Patrick,et al.  A Framework for Implementing Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) in Freshman Biology Labs , 2016, The American Biology Teacher.

[17]  Patrick J. Killion,et al.  CUREs in biochemistry—where we are and where we should go , 2016, Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.

[18]  Erin L. Dolan,et al.  Early Engagement in Course-Based Research Increases Graduation Rates and Completion of Science, Engineering, and Mathematics Degrees , 2016, CBE life sciences education.

[19]  E. Bettinger,et al.  When inputs are outputs: The case of graduate student instructors , 2016 .

[20]  Cara Gormally,et al.  Uncovering Barriers to Teaching Assistants (TAs) Implementing Inquiry Teaching: Inconsistent Facilitation Techniques, Student Resistance, and Reluctance to Share Control over Learning with Students † , 2016, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[21]  Sara E. Brownell,et al.  A High-Enrollment Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience Improves Student Conceptions of Scientific Thinking and Ability to Interpret Data , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[22]  Sara E. Brownell,et al.  Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Can Make Scientific Research More Inclusive , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[23]  Sara A. Wyse,et al.  Teaching Assistant Professional Development in Biology: Designed for and Driven by Multidimensional Data , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[24]  Pratibha Varma-Nelson,et al.  Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[25]  David Lopatto,et al.  Classroom-Based Science Research at the Introductory Level: Changes in Career Choices and Attitude , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[26]  D. Grimaldi,et al.  Why Descriptive Science Still Matters , 2007 .

[27]  Judith S. Ridgway,et al.  Research and Teaching: Teaching Assistant and Faculty Perceptions of Ongoing, Personalized TA Professional Development: Initial Lessons and Plans for the Future , 2017 .

[28]  Sara E. Brownell,et al.  Faculty Perspectives on Developing and Teaching Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences , 2016 .

[29]  Sara E. Brownell,et al.  Research and Teaching. Effects of a Research-Based Ecology Lab Course: A Study of Nonvolunteer Achievement, Self-Confidence, and Perception of Lab Course Purpose. , 2013 .

[30]  Grant E. Gardner,et al.  A Conceptual Framework for Graduate Teaching Assistant Professional Development Evaluation and Research Evaluation of Gta Tpd Programs Conceptual Framework Outcome Variables Contextual Variables Gta Training Design Variables Gta Cognition Gta Teaching Practice Undergraduate Student Outcomes Moderati , 2022 .