Information technology in university‐level mathematics teaching and learning: a mathematician’s point of view

Although mathematicians frequently use specialist software in direct teaching ofmathematics, as a means of delivery e-learning technologies have so far been lesswidely used. We (mathematicians) insist that teaching methods should be subjectspecificand content-driven, not delivery-driven. We oppose generic approaches toteaching, including excessively generalist, content-free, one-size-fits-allpromotion of information and communications technology. This stance is fullyexpressed, for example, in the recent Teaching Position Statement from the LondonMathematical Society (2010) and is supported by a recent report from the NationalUnion of Students (2010, 5): “Not every area of study needed or was compatiblewith e-learning, and so to assume it would grant blanket advantages was notaccurate”. This paper is an attempt to explain mathematicians’ selectivity in use ofinformation and communications technology and its guiding principles. The paperis addressed to our non-mathematician colleagues and is not intended to be a surveyof the existing software and courseware for mathematics teaching – the corpus ofexisting solutions is enormous and its discussion inevitably involves hardcoremathematics. 10.1080/09687769.2010.548504

[1]  Chris Sangwin Assessing elementary algebra with STACK , 2007 .

[2]  Donald Ervin Knuth Digital typography , 1999, CSLI lecture notes series.

[3]  John Etchemendy,et al.  The language of first-order logic - including the Macintosh version of Tarski's world 4.0, Third Edition , 1993, CSLI lecture notes series.

[4]  Dave Barker-Plummer,et al.  Tarski's world , 2008 .

[5]  Keith Price Review of "TEX and METAFONT, New Directions in Typesetting by Donald Knuth", Digital Press and the American Mathematical Society. , 1980, SGAR.

[6]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  The TeXbook , 1984 .

[7]  J Neubüser Groups '93 Galway / St Andrews: An invitation to computational group theory , 1995 .

[8]  Leslie Lamport,et al.  LATEX. A document preparation system. User's Guide and Reference Manual , 1996 .

[9]  Jim Hefferon,et al.  Linear Algebra , 2012 .

[10]  Dave Barker-Plummer,et al.  Language, Proof and Logic , 1999 .

[11]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  TeX: The Program , 1986 .

[12]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  TEX and METAFONT: New directions in typesetting , 1979 .

[13]  Yves Chevallard,et al.  La transposition didactique : du savoir savant au savoir enseigné / , 1985 .

[14]  Sun-Joo Shin,et al.  Heterogeneous Reasoning and Its Logic , 2004, Bulletin of Symbolic Logic.

[15]  Jon Barwise,et al.  Computers, visualization, and the nature of reasoning , 1998 .

[16]  H. Bass Mathematics, mathematicians, and mathematics education , 2005 .

[17]  Donald E. Knuth,et al.  3:16 Bible Texts Illuminated , 1991 .

[18]  Gary R. Hall Digitize This Book!: The Politics of New Media, or Why We Need Open Access Now , 2008 .

[19]  Stanley Morison,et al.  First Principles of Typography , 1936 .