The design of a multilevel survey of children, families, and communities: The Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey

In the last ten years, there has been a growing interest in the role of neighborhoods in shaping a variety of outcomes for families, adults, and children. Although theoretical perspectives are well advanced and the basic statistical methods for modeling neighborhood effects are in place, a major shortcoming concerns the limitations of existing datasets. Recent studies concerned with understanding children's outcomes have not been designed with the explicit goal of supporting multilevel modeling. This makes it difficult to address the most important unresolved research issue in this area, which is to develop an understanding of the causal effects of neighborhoods factors. In this paper, the authors describe the sampling design of the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Study (L.A.FANS), a new survey of children, families, and neighborhoods in Los Angeles County. This survey was designed explicitly to support multilevel studies on a number of topics, including child development, residential mobility, and welfare reform. The study is longitudinal and includes a baseline survey and several follow-up waves, which will track previously interviewed respondents and will include a sample of new entrants into the sampled neighborhoods. The authors highlight the main design and analytical considerations that shaped the study. The authors also describe the results of an in-depth statistical investigation of the survey's ability to support multilevel analyses that were carried out as part of the study design.

[1]  D. Massey American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass , 1993 .

[2]  G. Duncan,et al.  Economic deprivation and early childhood development. , 1994, Child development.

[3]  D. Harding Counterfactual Models of Neighborhood Effects: The Effect of Neighborhood Poverty on Dropping Out and Teenage Pregnancy1 , 2003, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  S A Stansfeld,et al.  Job control, personal characteristics, and heart disease. , 1998, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[5]  Laurence E. Lynn,et al.  Inner-city poverty in the United States , 1990 .

[6]  U. Bronfenbrenner Ecology of the family as a context for human development: research perspectives , 1986 .

[7]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Standard Errors and Sample Sizes for Two-Level Research , 1993 .

[8]  S. Hoffman,et al.  The Effect of Neighborhood Characteristics on Young Adult Outcomes: Alternative Estimates. , 1999 .

[9]  R. Sampson,et al.  ASSESSING "NEIGHBORHOOD EFFECTS": Social Processes and New Directions in Research , 2002 .

[10]  Kenneth D. Bailey,et al.  Macro-micro linkages in sociology , 1992 .

[11]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Statistical power and optimal design for multisite randomized trials. , 2000, Psychological methods.

[12]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[13]  Anne R. Pebley,et al.  Neighborhood Definitions and the Spatial Dimension of Daily Life in Los Angeles , 2002 .

[14]  Karen E. Campbell,et al.  Racial differences in urban neighboring , 1991 .

[15]  R. Moffitt,et al.  Mothers' Transitions from Welfare to Work and the Well-Being of Preschoolers and Adolescents , 2003, Science.

[16]  Daniel Aaronson,et al.  Using sibling data to estimate the impact of neighborhoods on children's educational outcomes , 1998 .

[17]  Allan Donner,et al.  Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research , 2001 .

[18]  N. Sastry,et al.  Non-Response in the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey , 2003 .

[19]  D. Massey,et al.  Segregation, the concentration of poverty, and the life chances of individuals , 1991 .

[20]  Martijn P. F. Berger,et al.  Design Issues for Experiments in Multilevel Populations , 2000 .

[21]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhood Effects on Educational Attainment: A Multilevel Analysis. , 1991 .

[22]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and Adolescent Development: How Can We Determine the Links? , 1998 .

[23]  E. Michael Foster,et al.  An illustration of the use of instrumental variables: Do neighborhood conditions affect a young person's chance of finishing high school? , 1996 .

[24]  D. Ginther,et al.  Neighborhood Attributes as Determinants of Children's Outcomes How Robust are the Relationships? , 2000 .

[25]  Greg J. Duncan,et al.  Neighborhood Poverty: Context and Consequences for Children, Volume I, and Neighborhood Poverty: Policy Implications in Studying Neighborhoods, Volume II , 1999 .

[26]  W. Wilson When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor , 1996 .

[27]  J. Hox,et al.  Sample sizes for multilevel modeling , 2002 .

[28]  D. Hedeker,et al.  Sample Size Estimation for Longitudinal Designs with Attrition: Comparing Time-Related Contrasts Between Two Groups , 1999 .

[29]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[30]  K. Zou,et al.  Sample size considerations in observational health care quality studies , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[31]  Amos H. Hawley Human Ecology—A Theory of Community Structure , 1950 .

[32]  Succeeding Generations: On the Effects of Investments in Children. , 1997 .

[33]  Paul D. Smith,et al.  Urban activity spaces: Illustrations and application of a conceptual model for integrating the time and space dimensions , 1998 .

[34]  I. Luckey : American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass , 1995 .

[35]  W. Evans,et al.  Measuring Peer Group Effects: A Study of Teenage Behavior , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[36]  Gary D. Sandefur,et al.  Opportunity and Change. , 1978 .

[37]  Michael P. Cohen Determining sample size for surveys with data analyzed by hierarchical linear models , 1998 .

[38]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Neighborhoods and violent crime: a multilevel study of collective efficacy. , 1997, Science.

[39]  H. Wiegand,et al.  Kish, L.: Survey Sampling. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, London 1965, IX + 643 S., 31 Abb., 56 Tab., Preis 83 s. , 1968 .

[40]  J. Billy,et al.  A Multilevel Analysis of Marital and Nonmarital Fertility in the U.S. , 1992 .

[41]  R. Waldinger,et al.  Ethnic Los Angeles , 1998 .

[42]  A. Winsor Sampling techniques. , 2000, Nursing times.

[43]  A. Crouter,et al.  Does It Take a Village? Community Effects on Children, Adolescents, and Families. , 2001 .

[44]  J. Brooks-Gunn,et al.  The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  Eric P. Baumer,et al.  Deciphering Community and Race Effects on Adolescent Premarital Childbearing , 2000 .

[46]  S. Raudenbush Statistical analysis and optimal design for cluster randomized trials , 1997 .

[47]  Mirjam Moerbeek,et al.  Multiple-objective optimal designs for the hierarchical linear model , 2002 .

[48]  N. Sastry,et al.  The Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey: Codebook , 2003 .

[49]  S. Fordham,et al.  Black students' school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting white’” , 1986 .

[50]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .

[51]  Barrett A. Lee,et al.  How urbanites define their neighborhoods , 1984 .

[52]  Jan de Leeuw,et al.  Introducing Multilevel Modeling , 1998 .

[53]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[54]  N. Lin SOCIAL NETWORKS AND STATUS ATTAINMENT , 1999 .

[55]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[56]  R. Sampson,et al.  Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[57]  John R. Logan,et al.  Residents' Perceptions of Suburban Community Differences , 1983 .

[58]  Martha A. Gephart,et al.  Development in context: Implications for studying neighborhood effects , 1997 .

[59]  A C Gielen,et al.  Violence by male partners against women during the childbearing year: a contextual analysis. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[60]  S. Robert SOCIOECONOMIC POSITION AND HEALTH: The Independent Contribution of Community Socioeconomic Context1 , 1999 .

[61]  W G Axinn,et al.  7. The Neighborhood History Calendar: A Data Collection Method Designed for Dynamic Multilevel Modeling , 1997, Sociological methodology.

[62]  S. Raudenbush,et al.  Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[63]  Christopher Winship,et al.  THE ESTIMATION OF CAUSAL EFFECTS FROM OBSERVATIONAL DATA , 1999 .

[64]  W. Wilson The Truly Disadvantaged , 1987 .

[65]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Systematic Social Observation of Public Spaces: A New Look at Disorder in Urban Neighborhoods1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Beyond Social Capital: Spatial Dynamics of Collective Efficacy for Children , 1999, American Sociological Review.

[67]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  The Company You Keep: The Effects of Family and Neighborhood on Disadvantaged Youths , 1991 .

[68]  J. Blasius,et al.  Social science methodology in the new millennium. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Logic and Methodology (CD-rom). , 2000 .

[69]  Kosuke Imai,et al.  Survey Sampling , 1998, Nov/Dec 2017.

[70]  Gary Chamberlain,et al.  Analysis of Covariance with Qualitative Data , 1979 .

[71]  N. Sastry,et al.  Neighborhoods, Poverty and Children’s Well-being , 2003 .

[72]  Paul E. Peterson,et al.  The Urban Underclass. , 1992 .

[73]  S L Normand,et al.  On determination of sample size in hierarchical binomial models , 2001, Statistics in medicine.

[74]  C. Coulton,et al.  Mapping Residents' Perceptions of Neighborhood Boundaries: A Methodological Note , 2001, American journal of community psychology.

[75]  C. Aneshensel,et al.  The neighborhood context of adolescent mental health. , 1996, Journal of health and social behavior.