Reconstructing the calibrated strain signal in the Advanced LIGO detectors

Advanced LIGO's raw detector output needs to be calibrated to compute dimensionless strain h(t). Calibrated strain data is produced in the time domain using both a low-latency, online procedure and a high-latency, offline procedure. The low-latency h(t) data stream is produced in two stages, the first of which is performed on the same computers that operate the detector's feedback control system. This stage, referred to as the front-end calibration, uses infinite impulse response (IIR) filtering and performs all operations at a 16 384 Hz digital sampling rate. Due to several limitations, this procedure currently introduces certain systematic errors in the calibrated strain data, motivating the second stage of the low-latency procedure, known as the low-latency gstlal calibration pipeline. The gstlal calibration pipeline uses finite impulse response (FIR) filtering to apply corrections to the output of the front-end calibration. It applies time-dependent correction factors to the sensing and actuation components of the calibrated strain to reduce systematic errors. The gstlal calibration pipeline is also used in high latency to recalibrate the data, which is necessary due mainly to online dropouts in the calibrated data and identified improvements to the calibration models or filters.

[1]  T. Hayler,et al.  Update on quadruple suspension design for Advanced LIGO , 2012 .

[2]  B. A. Boom,et al.  ScholarWorks @ UTRGV ScholarWorks @ UTRGV Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914 Properties of the Binary Black Hole Merger GW150914 , 2016 .

[3]  Y. Wang,et al.  Calibration of the Advanced LIGO detectors for the discovery of the binary black-hole merger GW150914 , 2016, 1602.03845.

[4]  B. A. Boom,et al.  Upper Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background from Advanced LIGO's First Observing Run , 2016, 1612.02029.

[5]  R. Bork,et al.  Sensitivity of the Advanced LIGO detectors at the beginning of gravitational wave astronomy , 2016, 1604.00439.

[6]  T. D. Abbott,et al.  Validating gravitational-wave detections: The advanced LIGO hardware injection system , 2016, 1612.07864.

[7]  F. Pretorius,et al.  Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226 , 2016, 1603.08955.

[8]  N. Lockerbie,et al.  Sensors and actuators for the Advanced LIGO mirror suspensions , 2012, 1205.5643.

[9]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[10]  Y. Wang,et al.  The Rate of Binary Black Hole Mergers Inferred from Advanced LIGO Observations Surrounding GW150914 , 2016 .

[11]  B. A. Boom,et al.  Binary Black Hole Mergers in the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run , 2016, 1606.04856.

[12]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[13]  B. A. Boom,et al.  Directional Limits on Persistent Gravitational Waves from Advanced LIGO's First Observing Run. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[14]  M. S. Shahriar,et al.  Characterization of the LIGO detectors during their sixth science run , 2014, 1410.7764.

[15]  D Huet,et al.  GW150914: The Advanced LIGO Detectors in the Era of First Discoveries. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[16]  Unto K. Laine,et al.  Splitting the unit delay [FIR/all pass filters design] , 1996, IEEE Signal Process. Mag..

[17]  Y. Wang,et al.  First Low-Frequency Einstein@Home All-Sky Search for Continuous Gravitational Waves in Advanced LIGO Data , 2017, 1707.02669.

[18]  anonymous,et al.  Erratum: GW170104: Observation of a 50-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift 0.2 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 221101 (2017)]. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[19]  Anonymous,et al.  Erratum: Tests of General Relativity with GW150914 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 221101 (2016)]. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[20]  Yanbei Chen,et al.  Signal recycled laser-interferometer gravitational-wave detectors as optical springs , 2002 .

[21]  B. P. Abbott,et al.  Erratum: Binary Black Hole Mergers in the First Advanced LIGO Observing Run [Phys. Rev. X 6 , 041015 (2016)] , 2018, Physical Review X.

[22]  Michael Perreur-Lloyd,et al.  Quadruple suspension design for Advanced LIGO , 2002 .

[23]  D Huet,et al.  GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence , 2016 .

[24]  N. Yunes,et al.  Theoretical physics implications of gravitational wave observation with future detectors , 2017, 1704.08268.

[25]  Gainesville,et al.  The Advanced LIGO photon calibrators. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[26]  Michael Hillard,et al.  Advanced LIGO two-stage twelve-axis vibration isolation and positioning platform. Part 1: Design and production overview , 2014, 1407.6377.

[27]  Von Welch,et al.  Reproducing GW150914: The First Observation of Gravitational Waves From a Binary Black Hole Merger , 2016, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[28]  Making h(t) for LIGO , 2004, gr-qc/0405070.

[29]  D Huet,et al.  Tests of General Relativity with GW150914. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[30]  Duncan A. Brown,et al.  Calibration uncertainty for Advanced LIGO’s first and second observing runs , 2017, 1708.03023.

[31]  Philip Graff,et al.  THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FOLLOW-UP WITH ADVANCED LIGO AND VIRGO , 2014, 1404.5623.

[32]  B. A. Boom,et al.  GW170814: A Three-Detector Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Coalescence. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[33]  Y. Wang,et al.  First search for gravitational waves from known pulsars with advanced LIGO , 2017, 1701.07709.

[34]  Gravitational radiation, inspiraling binaries, and cosmology , 1993, gr-qc/9304020.