Effect of Case-Mix and Random Variation on Breast Cancer Care Quality Indicators and Their Rankability.

[1]  Ewout W. Steyerberg,et al.  Ranking hospital performance based on individual indicators: can we increase reliability by creating composite indicators? , 2019, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[2]  S. Siesling,et al.  Variation in use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III breast cancer: Results of the Dutch national breast cancer audit. , 2017, Breast.

[3]  S. Siesling,et al.  Hospital organizational factors affect the use of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer in the Netherlands. , 2017, Breast.

[4]  M. Hassett.  Quality Improvement in the Era of Big Data. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  M. Trudeau,et al.  Setting Quality Improvement Priorities for Women Receiving Systemic Therapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer by Using Population-Level Administrative Data. , 2017, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  A. Jager,et al.  Clinical auditing as an instrument for quality improvement in breast cancer care in the Netherlands: The national NABON Breast Cancer Audit , 2017, Journal of surgical oncology.

[7]  S. Siesling,et al.  Large variation between hospitals in immediate breast reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer in the Netherlands. , 2017, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[8]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Risk adjustment models for short‐term outcomes after surgical resection for oesophagogastric cancer , 2016, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Comparing colon cancer outcomes: The impact of low hospital case volume and case-mix adjustment. , 2015, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  C. Ko,et al.  Reliability Adjustment for Reporting Hospital Outcomes With Surgery , 2012, Annals of surgery.

[11]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Random variation and rankability of hospitals using outcome indicators , 2011, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[12]  P. Westenend,et al.  Re-resection rates after breast-conserving surgery as a performance indicator: introduction of a case-mix model to allow comparison between Dutch hospitals. , 2011, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[13]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Incorporating natural variation into IVF clinic league tables: The Expected Rank , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.

[14]  Judith H Hibbard,et al.  Does publicizing hospital performance stimulate quality improvement efforts? , 2003, Health affairs.