Accuracy assessment of Procrustes analysis for computing mid-sagittal plane of three-dimensional facial data

Objective: The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of Procrustes analysis(PA)to compute a mid-sagittal plane(MSP)of three-dimensional(3D) facial data. Methods: Facial surface data from 30 subjects were acquired by a Face Scan optical 3D sensor. Using the data, 30 asymmetrical facial images with a true MSP for control purpose were constructed using the original facial image. The MSPs of the 30 images are then computed using Procrustes analysis. The angle between the true-MSP and the MSP obtained using the PA, and the asymmetry index serve as measures of assessing the accuracy of the Procrustes analysis to compute the MSP of 3D facial data. Results: The mean value and the standard deviation of the angle between the true-MSP and the PA-MSP are 0.62° and 0.49° respectively. The t-test for paired groups is used to assess the differences between the two MSPs in the facial asymmetry index and P values of smaller than 0.05 are considered significant(t=0.783,p=0.440). Conclusions: There are no significant differences between the PA-MSP and the true-MSP in terms of the asymmetry index of the 30 subjects. Thus the Procrustes analysis can be used to compute the MSP of 3D facial data with a significant degree of accuracy.

[1]  Stephen Richmond,et al.  Three-dimensional quantification of facial symmetry in adolescents using laser surface scanning. , 2014, European journal of orthodontics.

[2]  Ezatollah Hazrati Distance from symmetry: A three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry. , 1996 .

[3]  R. Tallents,et al.  Validity of panoramic radiographs for measuring mandibular asymmetry. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[4]  D. Perrett,et al.  Symmetry, sexual dimorphism in facial proportions and male facial attractiveness , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Stephen Richmond,et al.  Three-dimensional longitudinal assessment of facial symmetry in adolescents. , 2013, European journal of orthodontics.

[6]  L. Farkas,et al.  Facial asymmetry in healthy North American Caucasians. An anthropometrical study. , 1981, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  Ilker Ercan,et al.  Facial asymmetry in young healthy subjects evaluated by statistical shape analysis , 2008, Journal of anatomy.

[8]  S Peck,et al.  Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[9]  S Richmond,et al.  Comparison between landmark and surface-based three-dimensional analyses of facial asymmetry in adults. , 2015, European journal of orthodontics.

[10]  Gerd Häusler,et al.  Reliability of a Method for Computing Facial Symmetry Plane and Degree of Asymmetry Based on 3D-data , 2007, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[11]  Janalt Damstra,et al.  A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry , 2011, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[12]  C. Goodall Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .

[13]  S. Richmond,et al.  Reliability of measuring facial morphology with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system. , 2005, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  Mohammad Y Hajeer,et al.  Three-dimensional assessment of facial soft-tissue asymmetry before and after orthognathic surgery. , 2004, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  Emeka Nkenke,et al.  Three-dimensional Analysis of Facial Symmetry in Cleft Lip and Palate Patients Using Optical Surface Data , 2008, Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie.

[16]  G. Häusler,et al.  Simple, robust and accurate phase-measuring triangulation , 1992 .

[17]  D. Zaidel,et al.  THE FACE, BEAUTY, AND SYMMETRY: PERCEIVING ASYMMETRY IN BEAUTIFUL FACES , 2005, The International journal of neuroscience.