Aesthetic and patient preference using a bone substitute to preserve extraction sockets under pontics. A cross-sectional survey.

PURPOSE To evaluate aesthetic and patient satisfaction after tooth extraction using a bone substitute (and soft tissue grafting when tissue thickness was lacking) under a pontic to preserve the alveolar ridge for aesthetic purposes. The contralateral natural tooth acted as internal control. MATERIALS AND METHODS All patients with at least one site under a pontic augmented with Bio-Oss(R) or Bio-Oss(R) Collagen with or without a concomitant connective tissue graft with at least a follow-up of 6 months after the ridge preservation procedure were eligible for the present retrospective study. Sites with a damaged buccal wall were excluded. Outcome measures were: aesthetics (pink esthetic score, PES) evaluated by an independent and blinded dental hygienist on the basis of clinical pictures, patient satisfaction, patient preference and complications. RESULTS Twenty-six patients were consecutively treated, and 23 patients attended the evaluation visit. In seven patients, soft tissue grafts were performed in conjunction with Bio-Oss placement. Eight to 86 months after the ridge augmentation procedure (mean 38 months), there were no statistically significant differences observed in PES between preserved sites and control teeth. Patient satisfaction did not show any statistically significant difference between the two groups either. All patients declared they would undergo the same procedure again. CONCLUSIONS Bio-Oss placement in post-extractive sites with a remaining buccal bone plate lead to a good aesthetic result. Randomised clinical trials with suitable control groups are needed to identify the most effective techniques and/or materials to preserve ridges under pontics.

[1]  Ronaldo B. Santana,et al.  Efficacy of vascularized periosteal membranes in providing soft tissue closure at grafted human maxillary extraction sites. , 2009, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[2]  A. Barone,et al.  Xenograft versus extraction alone for ridge preservation after tooth removal: a clinical and histomorphometric study. , 2008, Journal of periodontology.

[3]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Effects of a putty-form hydroxyapatite matrix combined with the synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 on alveolar ridge preservation. , 2008, Journal of periodontology.

[4]  M. Quirynen,et al.  Bone formation following implantation of bone biomaterials into extraction sites. , 2008, Journal of periodontology.

[5]  R. Haas,et al.  Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. , 2005, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  Márcio F. M. Grisi,et al.  Acellular Dermal Matrix and Hydroxyapatite in Prevention of Ridge Deformities after Tooth Extraction , 2005, Implant dentistry.

[7]  H. Greenwell,et al.  Comparison of an allograft in an experimental putty carrier and a bovine-derived xenograft used in ridge preservation: a clinical and histologic study in humans. , 2004, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  Giovanna Iezzi,et al.  Ridge preservation following tooth extraction using a polylactide and polyglycolide sponge as space filler: a clinical and histological study in humans. , 2003, Clinical oral implants research.

[9]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. , 2003, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[10]  H. Greenwell,et al.  Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[11]  T. Berglundh,et al.  The ovate pontic design: a histologic observation in humans. , 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  P. Coulthard,et al.  In search of truth: the role of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation with oral implants. , 2001, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[13]  P. Klokkevold,et al.  Influence of bioactive glass on changes in alveolar process dimensions after exodontia. , 2000, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[14]  T J Dylina,et al.  Contour determination for ovate pontics. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  A. Kiliç,et al.  Alveolar ridge reconstruction and/or preservation using root form bioglass cones. , 1998, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[16]  P. Klokkevold,et al.  Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. , 1998, Journal of periodontology.

[17]  J. Fiorellini,et al.  A feasibility study evaluating rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge device for local alveolar ridge preservation or augmentation. , 1997, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[18]  H. Salama,et al.  Alveolar ridge preservation and reconstruction. , 1996, Periodontology 2000.

[19]  G K Johnson,et al.  Pontic design and localized ridge augmentation in fixed partial denture design. , 1992, Dental clinics of North America.

[20]  D. Waite,et al.  Alveolar ridge maintenance with hydroxylapatite ceramic cones in humans. , 1986, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[21]  J. Kent,et al.  Preservation of the alveolar ridge with hydroxylapatite tooth root substitutes. , 1985, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[22]  N. von Wowern,et al.  Submergence of roots for alveolar ridge preservation. A failure (4-year follow-up study). , 1981, International journal of oral surgery.