Acute health problems among the people engaged in the cleanup of the Nakhodka oil spill.

To determine if the Nakhodka oil spill and subsequent cleanup efforts had any health effects on the residents along the oil-contaminated coast, we investigated the health status of Anto residents who resided nearest to the coast where the bow ran aground. Two hundred eighty-two men and women involved in the cleanup activities between January 7 and January 20 were interviewed and examined by public health nurses to determine whether they suffered physical symptoms after exposure to the oil spill. Urine examinations for hydrocarbon toxicological markers were performed on 97 residents. The average number of days worked on cleanup activities was 4.7 days for men and 4.3 for women. Seventeen percent of the subjects had worked on cleanup activities for more than 10 days. Protective equipment was used against direct exposure to oil during the cleanup jobs and consisted of gloves used by almost 100% of the subjects and masks used by 87.1% of women and by only 35.4% of men. Glasses were worn by less than 30% of the subjects. Many symptoms emerged after the beginning of cleanup activities. The principal symptoms included low back pain and leg pain, headache, and symptoms of eyes and throat. Among the subjects undergoing urine tests, only three people showed a higher level of hippuric acid, although they returned to normal in the second examination. Accordingly, the exposure to the oil and the subsequent cleanup efforts were suggested to inflict acute health problems on local residents.

[1]  K. Hayakawa,et al.  Aromatic Hydrocarbon Concentrations and Toxicities of Oil Spilled from the Nakhodka and Contaminated Environmental Samples , 1997 .

[2]  L A Palinkas,et al.  Community patterns of psychiatric disorders after the Exxon Valdez oil spill. , 1993, The American journal of psychiatry.

[3]  J. R. Payne,et al.  The fate of the oil spilled from the exxon valdez. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  John T. Omohundro,et al.  The Impacts of an Oil Spill , 1982 .

[5]  S. Wise,et al.  Specimen banking of marine organisms in the United States: current status and long-term prospective. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[6]  T. T. Shen,et al.  Residential releases of number 2 fuel oil: a contributor to indoor air pollution. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[7]  K. Taketa,et al.  Detection of waterborne mutagens and characterization of chemicals in selected galveston sites after an oil spill , 1994, Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology.

[8]  I. Uchiyama,et al.  Mutagenicity and PAH Contents of the Heavy Oil that Drifted Ashore on the Coast from the Tanker Nakhodka , 1997 .

[9]  H. Tyroler,et al.  An epidemiologic study of an oil mist exposure. , 1970, Archives of environmental health.

[10]  J. Crum Peak expiratory flow rate in schoolchildren living close to Braer oil spill. , 1993, BMJ.

[11]  B Järvholm,et al.  Health effects of tank cleaners. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[12]  P. Christie,et al.  Initial effects ofthe grounding of the tanker Braer on health in Shetland , 2006 .

[13]  L. Palinkas,et al.  Ethnic Differences in Stress, Coping, and Depressive Symptoms after the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill , 1992, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[14]  D. Campbell Shetland oil spill. , 1993, BMJ.