The application of self-organising maps to performance analysis data in rugby union

With the advent of professionalism in rugby union greater volumes of information are collected about player and team performance. A typical OptaTM, Sports CodeTM timeline, for a single rugby match, can have more than 2000 instances and labels of information. Unless there is a prior understanding of an opponent much time can be spent identifying irrelevant trends and information which may not fairly represent the performance of the match. Kohonen Self-organising Maps (SOMs) are a form of artificial neural network developed for clustering and visualising high-dimensional data by reducing the output to a low-dimensional output map. These visualisations may help the analyst quickly identify important relationships among the key performance indicators describing a match. In this paper we report on the application of SOMs to discrete data summarising matches in New Zealand’s ITM Cup rugby competition. The input variables were frequencies of common performance indicators. The SOM approach was used to narrow down the input variables to those that discriminate between successful and unsuccessful outcomes as well as map regions associated with various levels of success. Since map regions indicate game patterns or styles, further analysis showed that multiple game styles tended to lead to wins and multiple different styles tended to lead to losses. SOMs represent an important method for characterising game play in rugby union, we suggest continued use of SOMs will help make coaches and analysts more familiar with their interpretation and anticipate further streamlining of key performance indicator selection.

[1]  Keith Davids,et al.  Organization of motor system degrees of freedom during the soccer chip: An analysis of skilled performance , 2006 .

[2]  Jorma Laaksonen,et al.  SOM_PAK: The Self-Organizing Map Program Package , 1996 .

[3]  Anthony Robins,et al.  Artificial neural networks for analyzing inter-limb coordination: the golf chip shot. , 2011, Human movement science.

[4]  Peter F Lamb,et al.  Understanding the relationship among launch variables in the golf drive using neural network visualisations , 2012, Sports biomechanics.

[5]  Nic James,et al.  The development of position-specific performance indicators in professional rugby union , 2005, Journal of sports sciences.

[6]  José M Palao,et al.  Differences in game statistics between winning and losing rugby teams in the six nations tournament. , 2009, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[7]  J. Sampaio,et al.  Rugby Game-Related Statistics that Discriminate Between Winning and Losing Teams in Irb and Super Twelve Close Games. , 2010, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[8]  Roger Bartlett,et al.  Neural Network Modelling and Dynamical System Theory , 2011, Sports medicine.

[9]  K. V. van Rooyen,et al.  Ruck Frequency as a predictor of success in the 2007 Rugby World Cup Tournament , 2010 .

[10]  Michael G. Hughes,et al.  Performance analysis – a 2004 perspective. , 2004 .

[11]  Nic James,et al.  Team performance indicators as a function of winning and losing in rugby union. , 2004 .

[12]  Mike D Hughes,et al.  The use of performance indicators in performance analysis , 2002, Journal of sports sciences.

[13]  Wolfgang I. Schöllhorn,et al.  Self-Organizing Maps for the Analysis of Complex Movement Patterns , 1997, Neural Processing Letters.

[14]  Andrew Barnes,et al.  Performance indicators that discriminate winning and losing in the knockout stages of the 2011 Rugby World Cup , 2013 .

[15]  Carlos Lago-Peñas,et al.  Performance in Team Sports: Identifying the Keys to Success in Soccer , 2010 .