Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action

Matching supply and demand for knowledge in the fields of global change and sustainability is a daunting task. Science and public policy differ in their timeframes, epistemologies, objectives, process-cycles and criteria for judging the quality of knowledge, while global change and sustainability issues involve value pluralities and large uncertainties. In literature and in practice, it is argued that joint knowledge production in projects through collaboration between (and within) science and policy serves as a means to bridge the gap between the two domains. However, an assessment framework for analysing the merits and limitations of such projects, identifying good practices and enabling adaptive management as well as social learning had not yet been developed. This paper aims to develop such a framework. We portray joint knowledge production projects as policy arrangements in which the degree of success depends on the actors involved, contents of dominant discourses, presence of rules and the availability of resources. Literature was discussed to specify these four dimensions into seven success conditions for joint knowledge production. Scholars, boundary organizations and actors in projects can use the framework for retrospective analyses of projects, providing joint knowledge production with the empirical basis it still requires. The framework can also be used for promoting reflection in action as well as for formative assessments enabling social learning.

[1]  Tomás B. Ramos,et al.  Development of regional sustainability indicators and the role of academia in this process: the Portuguese practice , 2009 .

[2]  N. C. Van de Giesen,et al.  Identification of stakeholder perspectives on future flood management in the Rhine basin using Q methodology , 2008 .

[3]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[4]  S. Jasanoff,et al.  The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. , 1991 .

[5]  Jurian Edelenbos,et al.  Why is joint knowledge production such a problem , 2004 .

[6]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method. , 2007, Evaluation and program planning.

[7]  Patrick Steyaert,et al.  The European Water Framework Directive: How Ecological Assumptions Frame Technical and Social Change , 2007 .

[8]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[9]  D. Guston.  Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science: An Introduction , 2001 .

[10]  Patrick Steyaert,et al.  The role of knowledge and research in facilitating social learning among stakeholders in natural resources management in the French Atlantic coastal wetlands , 2007 .

[11]  G. T. Raadgever,et al.  Seven rules for researchers to increase their impact on the policy process , 2008 .

[12]  D. Sarewitz,et al.  Ex Post Evaluation: A More Effective Role for Scientific Assessments in Environmental Policy , 2000 .

[13]  Donald Huisingh,et al.  The roles of academia in Regional Sustainability Initiatives , 2009 .

[14]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[15]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  B. Kiteme,et al.  Researchers' roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal , 2010 .

[17]  B. Arts,et al.  Analysing governance modes and shifts — Governance arrangements in Dutch nature policy , 2012 .

[18]  C. Pohl,et al.  Principles for designing transdisciplinary research : proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences , 2007 .

[19]  Jan van Tatenhove,et al.  Political Modernisation and Policy Arrangements: A Framework for Understanding Environmental Policy Change , 2006 .

[20]  S. Beck.  Moving beyond the linear model of expertise? IPCC and the test of adaptation , 2011 .

[21]  David W. Cash,et al.  Salience, Credibility, Legitimacy and Boundaries: Linking Research, Assessment and Decision Making , 2002 .

[22]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research , 2010 .

[23]  M. Hajer,et al.  A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives , 2005 .

[24]  R. Pielke.  Misdefining ''climate change'': consequences for science and action , 2005 .

[25]  Clark A. Miller.  Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime , 2001 .

[26]  Ruud Smits,et al.  In search of relevance: The changing contract between science and society , 2009 .

[27]  J.G.F. Bunders Aelen,et al.  Knowledge Co-Creation: Interaction between Science and Society. A Transdisciplinary Approach to Complex Societal Issues , 2009 .

[28]  Matti Melanen,et al.  The role of co-operation between academia and policymakers for the development and use of sustainability indicators – a case from the Finnish Kymenlaakso Region , 2009 .

[29]  C. Termeer,et al.  Revitalizing Stagnated Policy Processes , 2007 .

[30]  Pieter Leroy,et al.  Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance , 2006 .

[31]  J. Sluijs,et al.  The Inclusion of Stakeholder Knowledge and Perspectives in Integrated Assessment of Climate Change , 2006 .

[32]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[33]  H. Nowotny.  Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge , 2003 .

[34]  Jan van Tatenhove,et al.  Political modernisation and the environment : the renewal of environmental policy arrangements , 2000 .

[35]  Matthijs Hisschemöller,et al.  Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis , 1995 .

[36]  J. Jiggins,et al.  Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: a synthesis of SLIM's lessons for research, policy and practice , 2007 .

[37]  R. Kemp,et al.  Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands , 2009 .

[38]  A. Irwin.  Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development , 1995 .

[39]  Sharon A. Jones,et al.  Evaluating the Science-Policy Interface for Climate Change Research , 1999 .

[40]  Eva Lövbrand,et al.  Co-producing European climate science and policy: a cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge , 2011 .

[41]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Handbook of Science and Technology Studies , 1995 .

[42]  David H. Marks,et al.  Learning about transdisciplinarity: Where are we? Where have we been? Where should we go? , 2001 .

[43]  R. Beunen,et al.  PERFORMING SUCCESS AND FAILURE IN GOVERNANCE: DUTCH PLANNING EXPERIENCES , 2012 .

[44]  V. D. Phillips,et al.  Roles of academia in regional sustainability initiatives: outreach for a more sustainable future , 2009 .

[45]  Robert Hoppe,et al.  Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements , 2005, Poiesis Prax..

[46]  D. Roux,et al.  Framework for participative reflection on the accomplishment of transdisciplinary research programs , 2010 .

[47]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[48]  Robert Hoppe,et al.  Scientific advice and public policy: expert advisers’ and policymakers’ discourses on boundary work , 2008, Poiesis Prax..

[49]  T. Gieryn,et al.  Boundaries of Science , 1995 .

[50]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda , 2008 .

[51]  Sybille van den Hove,et al.  A Rationale for Science-Policy Interfaces , 2007 .

[52]  T. Carter,et al.  Europe adapts to climate change: comparing national adaptation strategies , 2010 .

[53]  Kai N. Lee.  Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Kai N. Lee. 1993. Island Press, Washington, DC. 290 pages. ISBN: 1-59963-197-X. $25.00 , 1993 .

[54]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development , 2006 .

[55]  D. Roux,et al.  Bridging the Science-Management Divide: Moving from Unidirectional Knowledge Transfer to Knowledge Interfacing and Sharing , 2006 .

[56]  Jurian Edelenbos,et al.  Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects , 2011 .

[57]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[58]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[59]  Mark Wiering,et al.  Discursive shifts in Dutch river management: ‘deep’ institutional change or adaptation strategy? , 2006 .

[60]  Patricia Gober,et al.  Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater , 2010 .

[61]  Ralph Lasage,et al.  Towards a Climate-Proof Netherlands , 2009 .

[62]  Rolf Lidskog,et al.  Science and policy in air pollution abatement strategies , 2002 .

[63]  Peter P.J. Driessen,et al.  From Climate Change to Social Change: Perspectives on Science-Policy Interactions , 2010 .

[64]  D. Sarewitz.  How science makes environmental controversies worse , 2004 .

[65]  P. Martens,et al.  Sustainable development: how to manage something that is subjective and never can be achieved? , 2007 .

[66]  J. D. Liefferink.  The dynamics of policy arrangements: turning around the tetrahedron , 2006 .

[67]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[68]  Annica Kronsell,et al.  Environmental Politics and Deliberative Democracy: Examining the Promise of New Modes of Governance , 2010 .

[69]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  Earthly politics : local and global in environmental governance , 2004 .

[70]  Steinar Andresen,et al.  Science and politics in international environmental regimes : between integrity and involvement , 2000 .

[71]  S. Rayner,et al.  Human choice and climate change , 1998 .

[72]  Christian Pohl,et al.  From science to policy through transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[73]  T. Gieryn.  Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[74]  Maria Carmen Lemos,et al.  The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments , 2003 .

[75]  I. Immink,et al.  When Water Management Meets Spatial Planning: A Policy-Arrangements Perspective , 2006 .

[76]  J. Pielke.  The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics , 2007 .

[77]  K. Rothman,et al.  Science and policy making. , 1985, American journal of public health.

[78]  V. Bush.  Science, the Endless Frontier , 1999, Science, the Endless Frontier.

[79]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: Pathways, players, and partnerships , 2007 .

[80]  M. Lamers,et al.  Beyond dry feet? Experiences from a participatory water-management planning case in The Netherlands. , 2010 .

[81]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[82]  S. Jasanoff.  States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and the Social Order , 2004 .

[83]  Wim van Vierssen,et al.  Climate proofing the Netherlands , 2005, Nature.

[84]  M. Hisschemöller,et al.  Ecological Indicators: between the two fires of science and policy , 2007 .

[85]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[86]  J. R. Ravets,et al.  Post-Normal Science , 2006 .

[87]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[88]  E. McNie.  Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature , 2007 .