Abstract The importance of well-defined rail and wheel roughness measurement methods has increased considerably since roughness limits have become part of type testing specifications (2001) and Technical Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs, 2002). Also, the European interim model (RMR) for railway noise predictions (2002) provides a method to correct measured noise emission by using the difference between the reference roughness and the measured roughness. Looking at the future, it can be expected that accurate assessment of roughness will become a standard requirement, as the Harmonoise method, which is intended to become the standard noise prediction method in Europe, uses the roughness spectrum as main input data for rolling noise. With these developments in mind, it is time to review what a decade of roughness measurements has achieved in terms of instrumentation, measurement procedures and analysis methods. Ten years of experience using various roughness measurement systems lay at the basis of this paper. Directly measured (using a sensor) and indirectly measured (using a train) roughness results are compared. Over the years, the need to specify and approve measurement equipment has grown. A preliminary suggestion for standardisation is proposed and discussed. This will include a standard graphical representation and units for roughness. Average and spread of rail roughness and typical wheel roughness patterns are discussed. A separate section deals with rail roughness growth and grinding results. With regard to grinding as a noise reduction measure (so-called acoustical grinding), it is made clear that roughness monitoring is required to maintain the acoustical qualifications.
[1]
Xuetao Zhang.
Railway source models for integration in the new European noise prediction method proposed in Harmonise
,
2004
.
[2]
D. Thompson,et al.
An investigation into rail corrugation due to micro-slip under multiple wheel/rail interactions
,
2005
.
[3]
G. Hoêlzl,et al.
Entwicklung eines hochempfindlichen Schienenoberflächenmessgeräts als Beitrag zu weiteren möglichen Lärmminderungsmassnahmen im Schienenverkehr
,
1990
.
[4]
J Kalousek,et al.
Rail Corrugation: Characteristics, Causes and Treatments
,
1993
.
[5]
M. G. Dittrich,et al.
Improved measurement methods for railway rolling noise
,
2000
.
[6]
A. Bracciali,et al.
Rail Corrugation Measurements for Rolling Stock Type Testing and Noise Control
,
2002
.
[7]
M. G. Dittrich,et al.
ROUGHNESS ON DUTCH RAILWAY WHEELS AND RAILS
,
1996
.
[8]
David Thompson.
ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WHEEL AND RAIL SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND ROLLING NOISE
,
1996
.
[9]
Annika Igeland.
Dynamic Train/Track Interaction: Simulation of Railhead Corrugation Growth under a Moving Bogie Using Mathematical Models Combined with Full-Scale Measurements
,
1997
.
[10]
Jens C. O. Nielsen,et al.
Rail corrugation in The Netherlands—measurements and simulations
,
2002
.
[11]
P. J. Remington.
Wheel/rail noise— Part I: Characterization of the wheel/rail dynamic system
,
1976
.