A Network‐Based Analysis of Team Coordination and Shared Cognition in Systems Engineering

This paper presents a network-based approach for analyzing team coordination and shared cognition in engineering design teams. The research setting is an Integrated Concurrent Engineering ICE laboratory in which teams of approximately 20 engineers are collocated to conduct rapid conceptual design of scientific spacecraft. A design structure matrix DSM of expected interactions is constructed from technical information flow data, and DSM representations of reported interactions are created using survey data from 10 ICE design teams. A comparative analysis of expected and reported interactions is used to calculate a metric of team coordination called socio-technical congruence STC. To examine shared cognition, pairwise shared mental models SMMs are measured using pre- and post-session surveys on system design drivers. Shared knowledge networks SMMs as edges are constructed, and team learning is measured as the change in network structure over time. Analysis reveals statistically significant correlations between team learning and each of three technical attributes system development time, launch mass, and mission concept maturity and between team learning and team coordination. These results indicate that team members learn most from each other when working on difficult or unfamiliar problems and when expected and reported interactions are aligned. The paper concludes that team coordination and the design product in ICE are not necessarily directly related to each other but that both are related to shared cognition. Although this study focuses on conceptual design, it lays the foundation for future work examining the role of team coordination and shared cognition in full-scale system development programs.

[1]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Socio-technical congruence: a framework for assessing the impact of technical and work dependencies on software development productivity , 2008, ESEM '08.

[2]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  The organization and architecture of innovation : managing the flow of technology , 2007 .

[3]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[4]  G. Karpati,et al.  The integrated mission design center (imdc) at nasa goddard space flight center , 2003, 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8652).

[5]  Gary Klein,et al.  Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions , 2017 .

[6]  Masanori Takezawa,et al.  Centrality in sociocognitive networks and social influence : An illustration in a group decision-making context , 1997 .

[7]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited , 1977 .

[8]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[9]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[10]  Glenn E. Littlepage,et al.  Recognition and utilization of expertise in problem-solving groups: Expert characteristics and behavior. , 1997 .

[11]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Predicting technical communication in product development organizations , 1995 .

[12]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications , 2012 .

[13]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Metaphor No More: A 15-Year Review of the Team Mental Model Construct , 2010 .

[14]  S. Mohammed,et al.  Team Mental Model: Construct or Metaphor? , 1994 .

[15]  Annalisa L. Weigel,et al.  The Structural Approach to Shared Knowledge , 2013, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Janice Langan-Fox,et al.  Mental models, team mental models, and performance: Process, development, and future directions , 2004 .

[17]  K. Klein,et al.  Team mental models and team performance: a field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy , 2006 .

[18]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  Managing the flow of technology: technology transfer and the dissemination of technological informat , 1977 .

[19]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Thomas J. Allen,et al.  The Organization and Architecture of Innovation , 2006 .

[21]  Lu Hong,et al.  Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Robert J. Crutcher,et al.  The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. , 1993 .

[23]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Identifying Modular and Integrative Systems and Their Impact on Design Team Interactions , 2003 .

[24]  Keith Warfield,et al.  Technology readiness levels , 2016 .

[25]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Designing system development projects for organizational integration , 1999 .

[26]  G. Goodwin,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance: The Making of a Dream Team: When Expert Teams Do Best , 2006 .

[27]  M. Waller,et al.  Mental Model Updating and Team Adaptation , 2013 .

[28]  Annalisa L. Weigel,et al.  An application of the Design Structure Matrix to Integrated Concurrent Engineering , 2010 .

[29]  Alan MacCormack,et al.  Exploring the Duality between Product and Organizational Architectures: A Test of the Mirroring Hypothesis , 2011 .

[30]  Colin J. Neill,et al.  A cognitive collaborative model to improve performance in engineering teams—A study of team outcomes and mental model sharing , 2011, Syst. Eng..

[31]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[32]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[33]  Rosaline K Gulati,et al.  Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of Management Working Paper the Coupling of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure Decisions , 2022 .

[34]  N. M. Morris,et al.  On Looking into the Black Box: Prospects and Limits in the Search for Mental Models , 1986 .