Analysis of the Chesapeake Bay Hypoxia Regime Shift: Insights from Two Simple Mechanistic Models

Recent studies of Chesapeake Bay hypoxia suggest higher susceptibility to hypoxia in years after the 1980s. We used two simple mechanistic models and Bayesian estimation of their parameters and prediction uncertainty to explore the nature of this regime shift. Model estimates show increasing nutrient conversion efficiency since the 1980s, with lower DO concentrations and large hypoxic volumes as a result. In earlier work, we suggested a 35% reduction from the average 1980–1990 total nitrogen load would restore the Bay to hypoxic volumes of the 1950s–1970s. With Bayesian inference, our model indicates that, if the physical and biogeochemical processes prior to the 1980s resume, the 35% reduction would result in hypoxic volume averaging 2.7 km3 in a typical year, below the average hypoxic volume of 1950s–1970s. However, if the post-1980 processes persist the 35% reduction would result in much higher hypoxic volume averaging 6.0 km3. Load reductions recommended in the 2003 agreement will likely meet dissolved oxygen attainment goals if the Bay functions as it did prior to the 1980s; however, it may not reach those goals if current processes prevail.

[1]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation , 2003 .

[2]  D F Boesch,et al.  Chesapeake Bay eutrophication: scientific understanding, ecosystem restoration, and challenges for agriculture. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[3]  Olli Malve,et al.  Estimating nutrients and chlorophyll a relationships in Finnish Lakes. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  W. Boynton,et al.  Modelling phytoplankton deposition to Chesapeake Bay sediments during winter-spring: interannual variability in relation to river flow , 2005 .

[5]  Dubravko Justic,et al.  Gulf of Mexico hypoxia: alternate states and a legacy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Craig A. Stow,et al.  Eutrophication risk assessment using Bayesian calibration of process-based models : application to a mesotrophic lake , 2007 .

[7]  J. Carstensen,et al.  Regime shift in a coastal marine ecosystem. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[8]  Mark E. Borsuk,et al.  On Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian inference , 2003 .

[9]  Kenneth H. Reckhow,et al.  Importance of scientific uncertainty in decision making , 1994 .

[10]  Matthew Dunn Introduction to the modelling of marine ecosystems, W. Fennel, T. Neumann, in: Elsevier Oceanography Series, vol. 72. (2004), (paperback), GBP 48, US $ 81.95, Eur 69, 297 pp., ISBN: 0-444-51704-9 , 2006 .

[11]  Donald Scavia,et al.  An ecological model of Lake Ontario , 1980 .

[12]  David Higdon,et al.  A Bayesian hierarchical model to predict benthic oxygen demand from organic matter loading in estuaries and coastal zones , 2001 .

[13]  James D. Hagy,et al.  A simple model for forecasting the effects of nitrogen loads on Chesapeake Bay hypoxia , 2006 .

[14]  Carol Janzen,et al.  Eutrophication and some European waters of restricted exchange , 2003 .

[15]  Jeff Gill,et al.  Bayesian Methods : A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach , 2002 .

[16]  Carl F. Cerco,et al.  Simulation of long-term trends in Chesapeake Bay eutrophication , 1995 .

[17]  K. Fennel,et al.  A box model approach for a long-term assessment of estuarine eutrophication, Szczecin Lagoon, southern Baltic , 2000 .

[18]  Michael R. Roman,et al.  Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions , 2005 .

[19]  Yong Liu,et al.  Exploring estuarine nutrient susceptibility. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[20]  M. Dowd,et al.  Influence of mussel aquaculture on nitrogen dynamics in a nutrient enriched coastal embayment , 2007 .

[21]  L. Linker,et al.  SETTING AND ALLOCATING THE CHESAPEAKE BAY BASIN NUTRIENT AND SEDIMENT LOADS The Collaborative Process, Technical Tools and Innovative Approaches , 2003 .

[22]  G. Brush,et al.  Long-Term History of Chesapeake Bay Anoxia , 1991, Science.

[23]  Robert M. Hirsch,et al.  Estimating constituent loads , 1989 .

[24]  R. Armstrong,et al.  Grazing limitation and nutrient limitation in marine ecosystems: Steady state solutions of an ecosystem model with multiple food chains , 1994 .

[25]  J. Hollibaugh,et al.  A Simple Heuristic Model of Nutrient Cycling in an Estuary , 1993 .

[26]  Dubravko Justic,et al.  Predicting the response of Gulf of Mexico hypoxia to variations in Mississippi River nitrogen load , 2003 .

[27]  M. Genkai-Kato Regime shifts: catastrophic responses of ecosystems to human impacts , 2007, Ecological Research.

[28]  Donald Scavia,et al.  Reassessing hypoxia forecasts for the Gulf of Mexico. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[29]  Carl F. Cerco,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Eutrophication Model of Chesapeake Bay , 1993 .

[30]  W. M. Kemp,et al.  Organic carbon balance and net ecosystem metabolism in Chesapeake Bay , 1997 .

[31]  Craig A. Stow,et al.  Modeling hypoxia in the Chesapeake Bay: Ensemble estimation using a Bayesian hierarchical model , 2009 .

[32]  Andrew Thomas,et al.  WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[33]  K. Boicourt,et al.  Effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation's estuaries: A decade of change , 2008 .

[34]  S. Chapra Surface Water-Quality Modeling , 1996 .

[35]  Mar Ecol Prog,et al.  Seasonal depletion of oxygen from bottom waters of Chesapeake Bay : roles of benthic and planktonic respiration and physical exchange processes ' , 2006 .

[36]  R. Howarth,et al.  Estuarine classification and response to nitrogen loading: Insights from simple ecological models , 2008 .

[37]  Andrew M. Edwards,et al.  The role of higher predation in plankton population models , 2000 .

[38]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[39]  David E. Smith,et al.  Oxygen dynamics in the Chesapeake Bay: A synthesis of recent research , 1992 .

[40]  Katja Fennel,et al.  Subsurface maxima of phytoplankton and chlorophyll: Steady‐state solutions from a simple model , 2003 .

[41]  A. Solow,et al.  A test for a regime shift , 2005 .

[42]  Carl F. Cerco,et al.  Process-based primary production modeling in Chesapeake Bay , 2004 .

[43]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  Spreading Dead Zones and Consequences for Marine Ecosystems , 2008, Science.

[44]  Lawrence W. Harding,et al.  Long-term increase of phytoplankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay, 1950-1994* , 1997 .

[45]  G. McManus,et al.  Phytoplankton pigments and growth rates, and microzooplankton grazing in a large temperate estuary , 1992 .

[46]  C L Newcombe,et al.  OXYGEN-POOR WATERS OF THE CHESAPEAKE BAY. , 1938, Science.

[47]  Kathleen Segerson,et al.  Clean Coastal Waters - Understanding and Reducing the Effects of Nutrient Pollution , 2000 .

[48]  James D. Hagy,et al.  Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–2001: Long-term change in relation to nutrient loading and river flow , 2004 .

[49]  M. Castonguay,et al.  Changes in the northern Gulf of St. Lawrence ecosystem estimated by inverse modelling: Evidence of a fishery-induced regime shift? , 2007 .

[50]  Dubravko Justic,et al.  Reducing hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico: Advice from three models , 2004 .

[51]  John Parslow,et al.  The analysis of alternative formulations in a simple model of a coastal ecosystem , 1999 .

[52]  L E Cronin,et al.  Chesapeake Bay Anoxia: Origin, Development, and Significance , 1984, Science.

[53]  Rui Zou,et al.  An adaptive neural network embedded genetic algorithm approach for inverse water quality modeling , 2007 .

[54]  C. Cerco Response of Chesapeake Bay to Nutrient Load Reductions , 1995 .

[55]  S. Malcolm,et al.  Assessing the impact of nutrient enrichment in estuaries: susceptibility to eutrophication. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.