Basic research needed for stimulating the development of behavioral technologies.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Iwata. The Development and Adoption of Controversial Default Technologies , 1988, The Behavior analyst.
[2] M Perone,et al. The Place of the Human Subject in the Operant Laboratory , 1982, The Behavior analyst.
[3] L R Cohen,et al. Differential sample response schedules in the acquisition of conditional discriminations by pigeons. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[4] B. Iwata,et al. Negative reinforcement in applied behavior analysis: an emerging technology. , 1987, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[5] B. Iwata,et al. Toward a functional analysis of self-injury. , 1994, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[6] H Rachlin,et al. Commitment, choice and self-control. , 1972, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[7] F. C. Mace,et al. Impulsivity in students with serious emotional disturbance: the interactive effects of reinforcer rate, delay, and quality. , 1993, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[8] Murray Sidman,et al. Matching-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations: The role of naming , 1986 .
[9] A. Neuringer. Can people behave "randomly?": The role of feedback. , 1986 .
[10] Steven C. Hayes,et al. THE CASE OF THE SILENT DOG—VERBAL REPORTS AND THE ANALYSIS OF RULES: A REVIEW OF ERICSSON AND SIMON'S PROTOCOL ANALYSIS: VERBAL REPORTS AS DATA1 , 1986 .
[11] R. Lazar,et al. Second-order control of sequence-class equivalences in children , 1986, Behavioural Processes.
[12] J J McDowell,et al. The importance of Herrnstein's mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. , 1982, The American psychologist.
[13] R. A. Sherman. Aversives, Fundamental Rights and the Courts , 1991, The Behavior Analyst.
[14] C. Bradshaw,et al. Behavior of humans in variable-interval schedules of reinforcement. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[15] B. Skinner,et al. Giving up the ghost , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[16] W D Pierce,et al. What Happened to Analysis in Applied Behavior Analysis? , 1980, The Behavior analyst.
[17] John A. Nevin,et al. RESPONSE STRENGTH IN MULTIPLE SCHEDULES1 , 1974 .
[18] D. Cerutti,et al. Discrimination theory of rule-governed behavior. , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[19] Applying Basic Research: A Review of J. D. Keehn’s Animal Models for Psychiatry , 1987 .
[20] R. Conger,et al. Use of Concurrent Operants in Small Group Research , 1974 .
[21] J. Spradlin,et al. Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[22] O. R. Lindsley,et al. The reinforcement of cooperation between children. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.
[23] R. Moxley. Some Historical Relationships between Science and Technology with Implications for Behavior Analysis , 1989, The Behavior analyst.
[24] J. Nevin,et al. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies? , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[25] M Galizio,et al. Contingency-shaped and rule-governed behavior: instructional control of human loss avoidance. , 1979, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[26] R. Fuqua. Comments on the applied relevance of the matching law. , 1984, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[27] L. Sánchez,et al. The formation of visual stimulus equivalences in children. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[28] M. Sidman,et al. Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[29] F C Mace,et al. Behavioral momentum in college basketball. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[30] M. Seligman,et al. Failure to escape traumatic shock. , 1967, Journal of experimental psychology.
[31] S C Hayes,et al. The technical drift of applied behavior analysis. , 1980, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[32] G. Green,et al. Development of conditional and equivalence relations without differential consequences. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[33] A W Logue,et al. Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[34] M. Perone,et al. The Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior: Indispensable, Ancillary, or Irrelevant? , 1991, The Behavior analyst.
[35] Jack Michael,et al. Flight From Behavior Analysis Presidential Address ABA 1980 , 1980 .
[36] S. Hayes. Rule-Governed Behavior , 1989 .
[37] P. N. Chase,et al. Effects of response variability on the sensitivity of rule-governed behavior. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[38] D F Hake,et al. The Basic-Applied Continuum and the Possible Evolution of Human Operant Social and Verbal Research , 1982, The Behavior analyst.
[39] J. Johnston. We need a new model of technology. , 1991, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[40] B. A. Matthews,et al. Uninstructed human responding: sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. , 1977, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[41] S. Hayes. The limits of technological talk. , 1991, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[42] W D Pierce,et al. Applied Behavior Analysis: New Directions from the Laboratory , 1983, The Behavior analyst.
[43] R. Herrnstein. On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[44] T. Ayllon,et al. The Psychiatric Nurse as a Behavioral Engineer , 1959 .
[45] P. Touchette,et al. A scatter plot for identifying stimulus control of problem behavior. , 1985, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[46] Shared Premises, Different Conclusions , 1991, The Behavior analyst.
[47] D. Braunling‐McMorrow,et al. Using stimulus equivalence procedures to teach name-face matching to adults with brain injuries. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[48] M. Davison,et al. Delay of reinforcers in a concurrent-chain schedule: An extension of the hyperbolic-decay model. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[49] J. Dinsmoor. The Respective Roles of Human and Nonhuman Subjects in Behavioral Research , 1991, The Behavior analyst.
[50] A. Poling,et al. The Schism Between Experimental and Applied Behavior Analysis: Is It Real and Who Cares? , 1981, The Behavior analyst.
[51] K. C. Kirby,et al. The merger and development of equivalence classes by unreinforced conditional selection of comparison stimuli. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[52] B. Martens,et al. The effects of variable-interval reinforcement on academic engagement: a demonstration of matching theory. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[53] J. J. McDowell,et al. Two Modern Developments in Matching Theory , 1989, The Behavior analyst.
[54] David E. Greenway,et al. Instructions, multiple schedules, and extinction: Distinguishing rule-governed from schedule-controlled behavior. , 1986, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[55] J A Nevin,et al. The analysis of behavioral momentum. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[56] R. Poppen,et al. STIMULUS GENERALIZATION AND THE RESPONSE-REINFORCEMENT CONTINGENCY. , 1964, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[57] J. Dinsmoor. Observing and conditioned reinforcement , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[58] W D Pierce,et al. The Basic Importance of Applied Behavior Analysis , 1986, The Behavior analyst.
[59] C. Cullen,et al. The flight to the laboratory , 1981, The Behavior analyst.
[60] J. M. Johnston. What Can Behavior Analysis Learn From the Aversives Controversy? , 1991, The Behavior analyst.
[61] W D Pierce,et al. Choice, Matching, and Human Behavior: A Review of the Literature , 1983, The Behavior analyst.
[62] M Sidman,et al. Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. , 1971, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[63] T. Layng,et al. Toward a Functional Analysis of Delusional Speech and Hallucinatory Behavior , 1984, The Behavior analyst.
[64] B. Martens,et al. The application of Herrnstein's law of effect to disruptive and on-task behavior of a retarded adolescent girl. , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[65] Richard J. Herrnstein,et al. MAXIMIZING AND MATCHING ON CONCURRENT RATIO SCHEDULES1 , 1975 .
[66] S. Hayes,et al. OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR EQUIVALENCE CLASS FORMATION IN LANGUAGE-ABLE AND LANGUAGE-DISABLED CHILDREN , 2005 .
[67] F C Mace,et al. A collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory. , 1990, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[68] S Hale,et al. Practical implications of the matching law. , 1984, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[69] R J HERRNSTEIN,et al. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[70] J. Overmier,et al. Effects of inescapable shock upon subsequent escape and avoidance responding. , 1967, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[71] L Green,et al. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Choice between Rewards Differing in Amount and Delay: toward a Choice Model of Self Control , 2022 .
[72] F. C. Mace,et al. Behavioral momentum in the treatment of noncompliance. , 1988, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[73] M. Sidman,et al. Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[74] J. E. Mazur,et al. Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[75] P N Chase,et al. The effects of a variety of instructions on human fixed-interval performance. , 1988, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[76] S. Hayes,et al. Rule-Governed Behavior: A Potential Theoretical Framework for Cognitive–Behavioral Therapy , 1982 .
[77] Elizabeth Pinter Lalli,et al. The momentum of human behavior in a natural setting. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[78] K. Saunders. Naming in conditional discrimination and stimulus equivalence. , 1989, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[79] J. J. McDowell,et al. Matching Theory in Natural Human Environments , 1988, The Behavior analyst.
[80] N. A. Neef,et al. Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[81] R. Stromer,et al. Control of adolescents' arbitrary matching-to-sample by positive and negative stimulus relations. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[82] M Sidman,et al. A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[83] W. McIlvane,et al. Complex stimulus relations and exclusion in severe mental retardation , 1985 .
[84] D M Baer,et al. An implicit technology of generalization. , 1977, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[85] B. A. Matthews,et al. Uninstructed human responding: Sensitivity of low-rate performance to schedule contingencies. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[86] D M Baer,et al. A Flight of Behavior Analysis , 1981, The Behavior analyst.
[87] Samuel M. Deitz,et al. Current Status of Applied Behavior Analysis: Science Versus Technology. , 1978 .
[88] T Thompson,et al. Conditional relations by monkeys: Reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[89] J. Nevin,et al. The Threat of Nuclear War: Some Responses , 1986, The Behavior analyst.
[90] A C Catania,et al. Preference for free choice over forced choice in pigeons. , 1980, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[91] J. Nevin,et al. Does contingent reinforcement strengthen operant behavior? , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.
[92] B. A. Matthews,et al. Human operant performance: Sensitivity and pseudosensitivity to contingencies. , 1986, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.