Learning in a Virtual World: Student Perceptions and Outcomes

During the past four years over 500 university students have explored the educational potential and value of learning in the virtual world of Second LifeTM. This research examined from the perspectives of on and off-campus students, their experiences of learning in this virtual world, through activities underpinned by adult learning theories. A compilation of student reactions to their learning in Second LifeTM was collected through three pilot studies, and this chapter examines in particular, the students’ perceptions of engagement, immersion, communication, interaction, collaboration and distractions, of learning virtually. The positives and negatives of learning in Second LifeTM from the points of view of the students, are discussed. Students who participated in this study were drawn from a variety of groups who were studying different subjects: on-campus students were required to participate in the virtual world educational activities; and the off-campus students, took part voluntarily. This research demonstrates that the students were highly engaged in their virtual learning, as voiced through their perceptions and reactions.

[1]  Nancy A. Jennings,et al.  Virtual or Virtually U: Educational Institutions in Second Life , 2007 .

[2]  Stefan Schutt,et al.  Virtual worlds as an architecture of learning , 2008 .

[3]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Learning & Instruction: The Theory Into Practice Database , 2003 .

[4]  Allen Tough,et al.  Andragogy in Action: Applying Modern Principles of Adult Learning , 1985 .

[5]  C. Candace Chou Virtual Worlds for Organization Learning and Communities of Practice , 2009, EC-TEL.

[6]  Susanne Gregory,et al.  Virtual Worlds: Can virtual worlds promote a higher level of collaboration, engagement and deeper thinking for students than traditional Web 2.0 tools? , 2009 .

[7]  Christine Elizabeth Reading Recognising and measuring engagement in ICT-rich learning environments , 2008 .

[8]  Ralf Steinmetz,et al.  An Authoring Tool for Educational Adventure Games: Concept, Game Models and Authoring Processes , 2013, Int. J. Game Based Learn..

[9]  G. Bodner Constructivism: A theory of knowledge , 1986 .

[10]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Future Learning Landscapes: Transforming Pedagogy through Social Software , 2008 .

[11]  Alexandra Petrakou,et al.  Interacting through avatars: Virtual worlds as a context for online education , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[12]  B. Tynan,et al.  Alternative realities: immersive learning for and with students , 2010 .

[13]  Debra J. Slone,et al.  A methodology for measuring usability evaluation skills using the constructivist theory and the Second Life virtual world , 2009 .

[14]  Gilly Salmon,et al.  The future for (second) life and learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[15]  Thalia M. Mulvihill,et al.  Mediating the Tensions of Online Learning with "Second Life" , 2008 .

[16]  Leo Tan Wee Hin,et al.  E-Learning and Virtual Science Centers. , 2005 .

[17]  S. Jimerson,et al.  Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms , 2003 .

[18]  George D. Kuh,et al.  Being (Dis)Engaged in Educationally Purposeful Activities: The Influences of Student and Institutional Characteristics , 2002 .

[19]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Learning, Teaching and Ambiguity in Virtual Worlds , 2010, Researching Learning in Virtual Worlds.

[20]  Teoh Ai Ping,et al.  Learning Patterns of Learner's Interaction in the Learning Management Systems: A Comparative Study of China and Malaysia , 2010 .

[21]  Steven Warburton,et al.  Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and the barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[22]  Barney Dalgarno,et al.  What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..