Just scratching the surface: varied coagulation effects of polymer containers on TEG variables

Background and objective: Different types of polymer surfaces affect the activation of platelets and coagulation pathway containers depending on their surface qualities. Importantly, this could produce variability of coagulation results obtained with thrombelastographical analysis. We assessed the effects of blood storage on thrombelastograph, TEG®, variables using polypropylene and polycarbonate containers. Methods: An in vitro experiment was performed, with eight volunteers in each limb. Fresh whole blood was stored in polypropylene or polycarbonate tubes prior to TEG® analysis, to assess the role of these plastics in the TEG® results obtained. Results: The polycarbonate tubes displayed slower onset of coagulation and greater variability of data for all four basic TEG variables (r‐time, k‐time, α‐angle and maximum amplitude, P < 0.05). Polycarbonate results fell outside manufacturer reference ranges. Conclusions: It is likely that this is due to the altered surface properties and charge effects of the containers affecting proteins and platelets differently. Caution should be used in choosing which containers are used for storage of fresh blood prior to coagulation assessment, as variable results will follow where different types of plastic containers are employed.

[1]  M. James,et al.  Coagulation effects of in vitro serial haemodilution with a balanced electrolyte hetastarch solution compared with a saline‐based hetastarch solution and lactated Ringer's solution * , 2002, Anaesthesia.

[2]  H. Nygren,et al.  Adsorption of coagulation proteins and adhesion and activation of platelets at the blood-solid interface. An experimental study of human whole blood. , 1988, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[3]  T. Okano,et al.  Hydrophilic-hydrophobic microdomain surfaces having an ability to suppress platelet aggregation and their in vitro antithrombogenicity. , 1986, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  H. Gralnick,et al.  Inhibition of cold-promoted activation of the prothrombin time studies of new siliconized borosilicate collection tubes in normals and patients receiving warfarin. , 1985, American journal of clinical pathology.

[5]  J. Andrade,et al.  Blood-materials interactions: the minimum interfacial free energy and the optimum polar/apolar ratio hypotheses. , 1982, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  J. Westgard,et al.  A comparison of hard and soft glass blood-drawing tubes. , 1979, American journal of clinical pathology.

[7]  N. Shinton,et al.  BLOOD SPECIMEN COLLECTION TUBES FOR COAGULATION TESTS , 1979, The Lancet.

[8]  C. Forbes,et al.  Thrombus formation and artificial surfaces. , 1978, British medical bulletin.

[9]  T. Chard,et al.  Conditions for collection of serum samples for the measurement of fibrin(ogen) degradation products by radioimmunoassay of fragment E. , 1976, Journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  H. Nygren,et al.  Different kinetics of the respiratory burst response in granulocytes, induced by serum from blood coagulated in contact with polymer materials. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[11]  B. Polack,et al.  Impact of the Blood Collection Tube on the Activation of Coagulation , 1997, Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[12]  R. Bick Hematology : clinical and laboratory practice , 1993 .

[13]  J. Koutts,et al.  Inappropriate Use of Non‐Siliconized Citrate Tubes for Clotting Tests , 1990, Pathology.

[14]  E. Bücherl,et al.  Blood-material interaction, ex-vivo test for the initial events. , 1985, Life support systems : the journal of the European Society for Artificial Organs.

[15]  Larry L. Hench,et al.  Biomaterials : an interfacial approach , 1982 .