Spatial patterns of exposure to sediment-laden flows on an experimental alluvial fan

Sediment-laden flows with significant amounts of large wood can impact alluvial fans and seriously damage infrastructure and property which makes a profound knowledge of exposure an essential requisite for risk mitigation. To investigate its spatial variability, we executed experiments on a simplified physical model and assessed the observed spatial process and exposure patterns by quantifying synthetic indexes and geostatistically analysing spatial probabilities. We systematically varied the loading conditions, i.e. total flow volume, solid fraction and the tank opening controlling water release, and repeated each experimental configuration eight times. Two alluvial fan layouts were considered, one equipped with a guiding channel and a bridge and one with a guiding channel only. First, we tested the hypothesis, that water released though the fully opened tank outflow valve induces a sediment-laden flow which is associated with higher exposure and lower spatial uncertainty of exposure if compared to flows generated by a half-opened tank outflow valve. Second, we tested whether a higher flow volume is associated with higher exposure on the alluvial fan and with lower spatial uncertainty. It turned out that neither of the aforementioned hypotheses is verified for the whole set of tested flow conditions. The first hypothesis is rejected in the majority of the considered conditions. The second hypothesis is prevailingly corroborated when the exposed areas due to both sediment and water were considered. Instead, when only the areas of sediment deposition are considered, this hypothesis is prevailingly corroborated on the alluvial fan featuring the presence of the bridge. We provided exposure probability maps for all experimental conditions and presented the variability of exposure by standard deviation ellipses. Although solely indicative for the adopted alluvial fan layouts, a variation of the loading parameters led to remarkable changes in the patterns of exposure probability and the parameters of the standard deviation ellipses. Our results urge decision makers to fully acknowledge the potential variability of geomorphic responses on alluvial fans in their risk management practices as to avoid underestimating the impacts for the built environment.

[1]  A. Iroumé,et al.  What do biphasic flow experiments reveal on the variability of exposure on alluvial fans and which implications for risk assessment result from this? , 2021, Natural Hazards.

[2]  L. Mao,et al.  Dinámica distributiva de flujos bifásicos con carga de madera en un abanico aluvial experimental , 2021 .

[3]  H. Lü,et al.  Influence of Calibration Parameter Selection on Flash Flood Simulation for Small to Medium Catchments with MISDc-2L Model , 2020 .

[4]  J. Venditti,et al.  Are Results in Geomorphology Reproducible? , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface.

[5]  B. Mazzorana,et al.  How do stream processes affect hazard exposure on alluvial fans? Insights from an experimental study , 2020, Journal of Mountain Science.

[6]  D. Bowman Principles of Alluvial Fan Morphology , 2018 .

[7]  S. Fuchs,et al.  Understanding impact dynamics on buildings caused by fluviatile sediment transport , 2018, Geomorphology.

[8]  S. Fuchs,et al.  Experimental analyses of impact forces on buildings exposed to fluvial hazards , 2018, Journal of Hydrology.

[9]  A. Schleiss,et al.  Experimental repetitions and blockage of large stems at ogee crested spillways with piers , 2018, Journal of Hydraulic Research.

[10]  M. Cavalli,et al.  Assessing and mitigating large wood‐related hazards in mountain streams: recent approaches , 2018 .

[11]  J. Ballesteros-Cánovas,et al.  Avulsions and the spatio-temporal evolution of debris-flow fans , 2018 .

[12]  Andreas Paul Zischg,et al.  Identifying spatial clusters of flood exposure to support decision making in risk management. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[13]  B. Mazzorana,et al.  Towards a robust assessment of bridge clogging processes in flood risk management , 2017 .

[14]  H. Kreibich,et al.  Preface: Flood-risk analysis and integrated management , 2016 .

[15]  L. Clarke Experimental alluvial fans: Advances in understanding of fan dynamics and processes , 2015 .

[16]  K. M. de Bruijn,et al.  Uncertainty in flood damage estimates and its potential effect on investment decisions , 2015 .

[17]  Bruno Mazzorana,et al.  A physical approach on flood risk vulnerability of buildings , 2014 .

[18]  F. Métivier,et al.  Laboratory alluvial fans in one dimension. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  M. Kleinhans,et al.  Contrasting morphodynamics in alluvial fans and fan deltas: effect of the downstream boundary , 2012 .

[20]  D. Jerolmack,et al.  Experimental Alluvial Fan Evolution: Channel Dynamics, Slope Controls, and Shoreline Growth , 2012 .

[21]  L. Clarke,et al.  An experimental investigation of autogenic behaviour during alluvial fan evolution , 2010 .

[22]  Vincenzo D'Agostino,et al.  Field and laboratory investigations of runout distances of debris flows in the Dolomites (Eastern Italian Alps) , 2010 .

[23]  M. Kleinhans,et al.  Autocyclic behaviour of fan deltas: an analogue experimental study , 2009 .

[24]  Sven Fuchs,et al.  Susceptibility versus resilience to mountain hazards in Austria - paradigms of vulnerability revisited , 2009 .

[25]  C. Paola,et al.  The “unreasonable effectiveness” of stratigraphic and geomorphic experiments , 2008 .

[26]  T. Davies,et al.  Anthropic aggradation of the Waiho River, Westland, New Zealand: microscale modelling , 2003 .

[27]  K. Whipple,et al.  Channel Dynamics, Sediment Transport, and the Slope of Alluvial Fans: Experimental Study , 1998, The Journal of Geology.

[28]  C. Fielding Terrigenous clastic depositional systems , 1997 .

[29]  John G. McPherson,et al.  Alluvial fans and their natural distinction from rivers based on morphology , 1995 .

[30]  C. Paola,et al.  Experimental study of avulsion frequency and rate of deposition , 1995 .

[31]  W. Bull,et al.  The alluvial-fan environment , 1977 .

[32]  R. Hooke Model Geology: Prototype and Laboratory Streams: Discussion , 1968 .

[33]  R. Bachi Standard distance measures and related methods for spatial analysis , 1963 .

[34]  D. Welty Lefever,et al.  Measuring Geographic Concentration by Means of the Standard Deviational Ellipse , 1926, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  I. Schalko Large Wood Accumulation Probability at a Single Bridge Pier , 2017 .

[36]  John G. McPherson,et al.  Processes and Forms of Alluvial Fans , 2009 .

[37]  T. Muto,et al.  Autostratigraphy: A Framework Norm for Genetic Stratigraphy , 2007 .

[38]  Hans Kienholz,et al.  Aspects of integral risk management in practice: Considerations with respect to mountain hazards in Switzerland , 2004 .