论文信息 - Environmental policy analysis: evaluating toxic impact assessment methods: what works best.

Environmental policy analysis: evaluating toxic impact assessment methods: what works best.

EDGAR G. HERTWICH Energy and Resources Group University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-3050 WILLIAM S. PEASE Environmental Defense Fund Oakland, CA 95616 THOMAS E. MCKONE Environmental Health Science University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-7360.

E. Hertwich | T. McKone | W. Pease | E. McKone | E G McKone

[1] Antonio Di Guardo,et al. Toxics release inventories : opportunities for improved presentation and interpretation , 1996 .

[2] Edgar G. Hertwich,et al. Evaluating the environmental impact of products and production processes: a comparison of six methods , 1997 .

[3] Chris Hendrickson,et al. Toxic Emissions Indices for Green Design and Inventory , 1995 .

[4] D. Mackay,et al. Evaluating the multimedia fate of organic chemicals: a level III fugacity model , 1991 .

[5] Antonio Di Guardo,et al. Assessing the fate of new and existing chemicals: A five‐stage process , 1996 .

[6] T E McKone,et al. Comparison of multi-media transport and transformation models: regional fugacity model vs. CalTOX. , 1995, Chemosphere.

[7] Michael Narodoslawsky,et al. The sustainable process index (SPI): evaluating processes according to environmental compatibility , 1995 .

[8] Reinout Heijungs,et al. A proposal for the classification of toxic substances within the framework of life cycle assessment of products , 1993 .