Solar utility and renewability evaluation for biodiesel production process

Abstract A new design concept using solar utility to supply steam and electricity for biodiesel production was proposed. A new indicator, called the renewability index, was then defined and quantified by exergy to evaluate the benefits of substituting fossil fuel utility facilities with solar utility facilities. To reduce the unfavorable environmental impacts of the biodiesel production process, a novel process on an 8000 t a−1 scale with solar utility facilities was designed and simulated using Aspen Plus. The results show that the amount of fossil fuel consumption saved per year amounts to 1275 t of standard coal and 4676 t of CO2 release is also eliminated every year. The renewability index of the biodiesel production process with solar utility facilities is 99.9%, 10.5% higher than that with fossil fuel utility facilities. The results reported in this paper indicate that the unfavorable environmental impacts of the biodiesel production process also deserve attention and the impacts can be eliminated by using solar utility facilities.

[1]  Xavier Gabarrell Durany,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Integrated Waste Management in the Recovery and Recycling of Used Cooking Oils , 2008 .

[2]  M. Eickhoff,et al.  Applied research concerning the direct steam generation in parabolic troughs , 2003 .

[3]  Aldo Steinfeld,et al.  The solar thermal decarbonization of natural gas , 2001 .

[4]  I. Dincer,et al.  Exergy as the confluence of energy, environment and sustainable development , 2001 .

[5]  T. Seager,et al.  Rethinking exergy efficiency in favor of exergy sustainability as a criteria for design , 2005 .

[6]  Xavier Gabarrell,et al.  Exergy analysis applied to biodiesel production , 2007 .

[7]  Naoko Ellis,et al.  Assessment of four biodiesel production processes using HYSYS.Plant. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[8]  G. Vicente,et al.  Integrated biodiesel production: a comparison of different homogeneous catalysts systems. , 2004, Bioresource technology.

[9]  Shintaro Yokoyama,et al.  Field experiments and analyses on a hybrid solar collector , 2003 .

[10]  Hongguang Jin,et al.  A novel polygeneration system integrating the acetylene production process and fuel cell , 2007 .

[11]  Mei Gong,et al.  On exergy and sustainable development—Part 1: Conditions and concepts , 2001 .

[12]  H. J. Van Der Kooi,et al.  Quantifying technological aspects of process sustainability: a thermodynamic approach , 2003 .

[13]  Duane T. Johnson,et al.  The glycerin glut: Options for the value‐added conversion of crude glycerol resulting from biodiesel production , 2007 .

[14]  H. Kameyama,et al.  Evaluation of reference exergies for the elements , 1982 .

[15]  Marc A. Rosen,et al.  Exergetic evaluation of the renewability of a biofuel , 2001 .

[16]  M. Dubé,et al.  Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 1. Process design and technological assessment. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[17]  Ruzhu Wang,et al.  An efficient solar-powered adsorption chiller and its application in low-temperature grain storage , 2007 .

[18]  Svein J. Nesheim,et al.  Efficiencies and indicators defined to promote combined heat and power , 2007 .

[19]  E. H. Pryde,et al.  Variables affecting the yields of fatty esters from transesterified vegetable oils , 1984 .

[20]  William S. Duff,et al.  Performance of the Sacramento Demonstration ICPC Collector and Double Effect Chiller in 2000 and 2001 , 2001 .