Detecting gravitational waves with disparate detector responses: Two new binary black hole mergers

We introduce a new technique to search for gravitational wave events from compact binary mergers that produce a clear signal only in a single gravitational wave detector, and marginal signals in other detectors. Such a situation can arise when the detectors in a network have different sensitivities, or when sources have unfavorable sky locations or orientations. We start with a short list of loud singledetector triggers from regions of parameter space that are empirically unaffected by glitches (after applying signal-quality vetoes). For each of these triggers, we compute evidence for astrophysical origin from the rest of the detector network by coherently combining the likelihoods from all detectors and marginalizing over extrinsic geometric parameters. We report the discovery of two new binary black hole (BBH) mergers in the second observing run of Advanced LIGO and Virgo (O2), in addition to the ones that were reported in [1] and [2]. We estimate that the two events have false alarm rates of one in 19 years (60 O2) and one in 11 years (36 O2). One of the events, GW170817A, has primary and secondary masses m 1 = 56 +16 −10 M and m src 2 = 40 −11 M in the source frame. The existence of GW170817A should be very informative about the theoretically predicted upper mass gap for stellar mass black holes. Its effective spin parameter is measured to be χeff = 0.5± 0.2, which is consistent with the tendency of the heavier detected BBH systems to have large and positive effective spin parameters. The other event, GWC170402, will be discussed thoroughly in future work.

[1]  A. Lundgren,et al.  2-OGC: Open Gravitational-wave Catalog of Binary Mergers from Analysis of Public Advanced LIGO and Virgo Data , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[2]  R. Sarpong,et al.  Bio-inspired synthesis of xishacorenes A, B, and C, and a new congener from fuscol† †Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/c9sc02572c , 2019, Chemical science.

[3]  I. Mandel,et al.  The Impact of Pair-instability Mass Loss on the Binary Black Hole Mass Distribution , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.

[4]  J. Kissel,et al.  Blip glitches in Advanced LIGO data , 2019, Classical and Quantum Gravity.

[5]  M. S. Shahriar,et al.  Binary Black Hole Population Properties Inferred from the First and Second Observing Runs of Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[6]  V. Kalogera,et al.  Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae in Very Close Binaries , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.

[7]  M. Zaldarriaga,et al.  Constraints on binary black hole populations from LIGO–Virgo detections , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[8]  A. Chieffi,et al.  Presupernova Evolution and Explosive Nucleosynthesis of Rotating Massive Stars in the Metallicity Range −3 ≤ [Fe/H] ≤ 0 , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.

[9]  Eric Thrane,et al.  Measuring the Binary Black Hole Mass Spectrum with an Astrophysically Motivated Parameterization , 2018, 1801.02699.

[10]  M. Fishbach,et al.  Where Are LIGO’s Big Black Holes? , 2017, 1709.08584.

[11]  M. Mapelli,et al.  Very massive stars, pair-instability supernovae and intermediate-mass black holes with the sevn code , 2017, 1706.06109.

[12]  S. Woosley Pulsational Pair-instability Supernovae , 2016, 1608.08939.

[13]  Chris L. Fryer,et al.  The effect of pair-instability mass loss on black-hole mergers , 2016, 1607.03116.

[14]  B. A. Boom,et al.  Characterization of transient noise in Advanced LIGO relevant to gravitational wave signal GW150914. , 2016, Classical and quantum gravity.

[15]  A. Merloni,et al.  X-ray spectral modelling of the AGN obscuring region in the CDFS: Bayesian model selection and catalogue , 2014, 1402.0004.

[16]  A. Lundgren,et al.  Effect of sine-Gaussian glitches on searches for binary coalescence , 2013, 1304.0008.

[17]  P. Cochat,et al.  Et al , 2008, Archives de pediatrie : organe officiel de la Societe francaise de pediatrie.

[18]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  The LSC glitch group: monitoring noise transients during the fifth LIGO science run , 2008, 0804.0800.

[19]  Kevin Barraclough,et al.  I and i , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  F. Hoyle,et al.  Neutrino processes and pair formation in massive stars and supernovae. , 1964 .

[21]  J. Hearnshaw,et al.  Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , 1999 .

[22]  Physical Review Letters 63 , 1989 .

[23]  I. Miyazaki,et al.  AND T , 2022 .