Preventing Maltreatment at Home: A Meta-Analysis Examining Outcomes From Online Programs

Purpose: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increase in cases of intimate partner violence (IPV) related to stay-at-home orders, as well as the financial and emotional stress many individuals are experiencing. With limitations on group gatherings, typical in-person prevention and intervention resources, such as anger management groups or batterer intervention programs, may be inaccessible to people in need of resources. Method: In order to understand effective options for reducing risk when face-to-face interventions are not feasible, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effects of online programs aimed at improving participants’ well-being and reducing IPV risk. Six studies were identified in databases using key search terms. Results: Change score comparisons revealed that online programs reduced participants’ anger, depression, emotional IPV perpetration, and physical IPV perpetration significantly more than control groups. Discussion: Findings suggest that online resources can help motivated individuals struggling with anger and/or at risk for IPV perpetration.

[1]  Galena K. Rhoades,et al.  Online programs improve relationship functioning for distressed low-income couples: Results from a nationwide randomized controlled trial. , 2020, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  S. Oertelt-Prigione,et al.  COVID-19: Reducing the risk of infection might increase the risk of intimate partner violence , 2020, EClinicalMedicine.

[3]  E. McCollum,et al.  The Role of Depression in the Relationship Between Psychological and Physical Intimate Partner Violence , 2019, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[4]  Lauren H. Yaeger,et al.  Compared to What? A Meta-Analysis of Batterer Intervention Studies Using Nontreated Controls or Comparisons , 2019, Trauma, violence & abuse.

[5]  Kirsten H. Dillon,et al.  Hostile interpretation training for individuals with alcohol use disorder and elevated trait anger: A controlled trial of a web-based intervention. , 2017, Behaviour research and therapy.

[6]  S. Stith,et al.  Mental Health Factors and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration and Victimization: A Meta-Analysis , 2017, Psychology of Violence.

[7]  G. Andersson,et al.  Preventing intimate partner violence via the Internet: A randomized controlled trial of emotion-regulation and conflict-management training for individuals with aggression problems. , 2017, Clinical psychology & psychotherapy.

[8]  K. Yeager,et al.  Breaking the Mold: Evaluating a Non-Punitive Domestic Violence Intervention Program , 2015, Journal of Family Violence.

[9]  J. Malouff,et al.  Effects of Online Cognitive Treatment for Problematic Anger: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Cognitive behaviour therapy.

[10]  F. Fincham,et al.  Computer-based prevention of intimate partner violence in marriage. , 2014, Behaviour research and therapy.

[11]  Noel A. Card Applied Meta-Analysis for Social Science Research , 2011 .

[12]  G. Cumming Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis , 2011 .

[13]  Hannah R Rothstein,et al.  A basic introduction to fixed‐effect and random‐effects models for meta‐analysis , 2010, Research synthesis methods.

[14]  L. Hedges,et al.  Introduction to Meta‐Analysis , 2009, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[15]  F. Fincham,et al.  A randomized clinical trial of a computer based preventive intervention: replication and extension of ePREP. , 2009, Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association.

[16]  Michael P. Johnson A Typology of Domestic Violence: Intimate Terrorism, Violent Resistance, and Situational Couple Violence , 2008 .

[17]  R. Digiuseppe,et al.  Anger Treatment for Adults: A Meta‐Analytic Review , 2006 .

[18]  C. Murphy,et al.  Treating the Abusive Partner: An Individualized Cognitive-Behavioral Approach , 2005 .

[19]  Jonathan P. Schwartz,et al.  Effects of a Group Preventive Intervention on Risk and Protective Factors Related to Dating Violence. , 2004 .

[20]  David C. Atkins,et al.  Traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy for significantly and chronically distressed married couples. , 2004, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[21]  R. Heyman,et al.  Stopping Wife Abuse via Physical Aggression Couples Treatment , 2003 .

[22]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[23]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis , 1989 .

[24]  Robert G. Orwin,et al.  A Fail-SafeN for Effect Size in Meta-Analysis , 1983 .

[25]  R. Orwin A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. , 1983 .

[26]  R. Rosenthal The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[27]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[28]  S. Oertelt-Prigione,et al.  Pandemics and Violence Against Women and Children , 2020 .

[29]  J. Hamel Couples Therapy for Domestic Violence: Finding Safe Solutions , 2012, Partner Abuse.

[30]  Juan Carlos Espinosa,et al.  Comprehensive Meta-Analysis , 2004 .

[31]  C. Robie,et al.  Does batterers' treatment work? A meta-analytic review of domestic violence treatment. , 2004, Clinical psychology review.

[32]  C. Spielberger,et al.  STAXI-2 : State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 : professional manual , 1999 .