Costs and impacts of potential energy strategies for rural households in developing communities

Abstract There are a variety of technologies that can help alleviate the energy poverty facing nearly 40% of the world's population today. Yet the most effective among a variety of options is often not clear due to the range of outcomes desired by various stakeholders, constraints imposed by the local conditions and needs, and factors dictating the application and use of these devices. To better understand and anticipate the differences between potential strategies, this article uses a multi-objective probabilistic system model previously developed by the authors to compare the baseline situation in a well-characterized village in Mali to six common single technologies including improved, advanced, communal, and LPG cookstoves; and solar water heating and lighting systems. An integrated strategy was also investigated. Outcomes in terms of energy access and use, health and climate impacts, economic costs and benefits, and quality of life were compared. Results showed that no single technology could optimally address all objectives simultaneously, and that objectives were often conflicting. An integrated approach that seeks to build upon the natural user tendencies to “stack” the fuels and devices that are most convenient and affordable for each task was found to produce the most significant impacts in all areas.

[1]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  Determinants of Household Energy Consumption in India , 2010 .

[2]  Nathan Gregory Johnson,et al.  Village energy system dynamics of an isolated rural West African village , 2012 .

[3]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[4]  Yongliang Ma,et al.  Greenhouse Gases and other Airborne Pollutants from Household Stoves in China: a Database for Emission Factors , 2000 .

[5]  Rufus Edwards,et al.  In-field greenhouse gas emissions from cookstoves in rural Mexican households , 2008 .

[6]  Ramchandra Bhandari,et al.  Electrification using solar photovoltaic systems in Nepal , 2011 .

[7]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  From Linear Fuel Switching to Multiple Cooking Strategies: A Critique and Alternative to the Energy Ladder Model , 2000 .

[8]  Vin Spoann,et al.  Fuelwood consumption patterns in Chumriey Mountain, Kampong Chhnang Province, Cambodia. , 2012 .

[9]  D. Streets,et al.  A technology‐based global inventory of black and organic carbon emissions from combustion , 2004 .

[10]  Amulya K. N. Reddy.  Rural energy consumption patterns - A field study , 1982 .

[11]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  How much do alternative cookstoves reduce biomass fuel use? Evidence from North India. , 2016 .

[12]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  A laboratory comparison of the global warming impact of five major types of biomass cooking stoves , 2008 .

[13]  R. A. Rasmussen,et al.  Greenhouse gases from biomass and fossil fuel stoves in developing countries: A Manila pilot study , 1993 .

[14]  P. Sadavarte,et al.  Household light makes global heat: high black carbon emissions from kerosene wick lamps. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Nathan G. Johnson,et al.  Factors affecting fuelwood consumption in household cookstoves in an isolated rural West African village , 2012 .

[16]  D. Kammen,et al.  The contributions of emissions and spatial microenvironments to exposure to indoor air pollution from biomass combustion in Kenya. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.

[17]  Rajesh R Pai,et al.  Feasibility assessment of Anchor-Business-Community model for off-grid rural electrification in India , 2016 .

[18]  R. Heltberg,et al.  Factors determining household fuel choice in Guatemala , 2003, Environment and Development Economics.

[19]  P. Abdul Salam,et al.  Emissions from biomass energy use in some selected Asian countries , 2000 .

[20]  C. Venkataraman,et al.  Emission factors of carbon monoxide and size-resolved aerosols from biofuel combustion. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Daniel M Kammen,et al.  Greenhouse gas implications of household energy technology in Kenya. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Nathan G. Johnson,et al.  Energy supply and use in a rural West African village , 2012 .

[23]  Nordica MacCarty,et al.  Fuel use and emissions performance of fifty cooking stoves in the laboratory and related benchmarks of performance , 2010 .

[24]  B. DeAngelo,et al.  Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific assessment , 2013 .

[25]  Kenneth M. Bryden,et al.  A Case Study of the Implementation and Maintenance of a Fee for Service Lighting System for a Rural Village in Sub Saharan Africa , 2012, DAC 2012.

[26]  Robert Bacon,et al.  Who Uses Bottled Gas? Evidence from Households in Developing Countries , 2011 .

[27]  Samuel F. Baldwin,et al.  Biomass Stoves: Engineering Design Development and Dissemination , 1988 .

[28]  W. Hao,et al.  Trace gas emissions from the production and use of domestic biofuels in Zambia measured by open-path Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy , 2003 .

[29]  Subhrendu K. Pattanayak,et al.  Benefits and Costs of Improved Cookstoves: Assessing the Implications of Variability in Health, Forest and Climate Impacts , 2012, PloS one.

[30]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  Pollutant emissions and energy efficiency under controlled conditions for household biomass cookstoves and implications for metrics useful in setting international test standards. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  J. Lacaux,et al.  Domestic biomass combustion and associated atmospheric emissions in West Africa , 1998 .

[32]  M. Andreae,et al.  Domestic Combustion of Biomass Fuels in Developing Countries: A Major Source of Atmospheric Pollutants , 2003 .

[33]  Milind Kandlikar,et al.  Health and climate benefits of cookstove replacement options , 2011 .

[34]  Tami C. Bond,et al.  Laboratory and field investigations of particulate and carbon monoxide emissions from traditional and improved cookstoves , 2009 .

[35]  Fabrizio Tediosi,et al.  Evaluation of the costs and benefits of interventions to reduce indoor air pollution , 2007 .

[36]  An Econometric Analysis of Fuelwood Consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa , 1998 .

[37]  S. K. Akagi,et al.  Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models , 2010 .

[38]  G Habib,et al.  Residential Biofuels in South Asia: Carbonaceous Aerosol Emissions and Climate Impacts , 2005, Science.

[39]  R. Cooper,et al.  The end of poverty: economic possibilities for our time. , 2008, European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe.

[40]  L. Molina,et al.  Trace gas and particle emissions from domestic and industrial biofuel use and garbage burning in central Mexico , 2009 .

[41]  Kirk R. Smith,et al.  GREENHOUSE IMPLICATIONS OF HOUSEHOLD STOVES: An Analysis for India , 2000 .

[42]  Nordica MacCarty,et al.  An integrated systems model for energy services in rural developing communities , 2016 .

[43]  Chandra Venkataraman,et al.  Global atmospheric impacts of residential fuels , 2004 .

[44]  Eiman O. Zein-Elabdin.  Improved stoves in Sub-Saharan Africa: the case of the Sudan , 1997 .