Decision-making for light rail

In transport literature there is an ongoing discussion on the potential of light rail in mitigating congestion and supporting mobility around urban centres. Throughout Europe and the United States, many policy makers see light rail as an interesting option to improve the accessibility of urban centres. The Dutch national government wanted to support swift light rail realization in a number of promising situations. Several projects gained support from the national government for implementation. However, the decision-making on a local level was not nearly as swift as expected and not in line with the promise. This paper presents an analysis of that perceived slowdown and shows that the approach of the national government with a strict focus on light rail and a detachment from the local processes has played an important role in the slowdown. It shows that light rail can very well be a solid option. However, its successful implementation is not solely dependent on light rail suitability for the mobility patterns in the region, but very much on the approach of the implementation of those supporting the option.

[1]  Bertil Hylén Light rail i Frankrike : planering, organisation och finansiering, en rapport inom temat Light rail - light cost, del II , 2001 .

[2]  John F. Kain,et al.  Secrets of success: assessing the large increases in transit ridership achieved by Houston and San Diego transit providers , 1999 .

[3]  Michael Barry Through the Cities: The Revolution in Light Rail , 1991 .

[4]  James E. Moore,et al.  TEN MYTHS ABOUT U.S. URBAN RAIL SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[5]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? , 2002, 1303.6604.

[6]  J. A. de Bruijn,et al.  Management in Networks: On multi-actor decision making , 2008 .

[7]  Bradley W. Lane Significant characteristics of the urban rail renaissance in the United States: A discriminant analysis , 2008 .

[8]  Richard Tay,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ANTI-DRINK DRIVING ADVERTISING CAMPAIGN IN NEW ZEALAND , 1999 .

[9]  G. Breeuwsma Geruchten als besmettelijke ziekte. Het succesverhaal van de Hush Puppies. Bespreking van Malcolm Gladwell, The tipping point. How little things can make a big difference. London: Little, Brown and Company, 2000 , 2000 .

[10]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  Meetings of the Future: Enhancing Group Collaboration with Group Support Systems , 1997 .

[11]  Rob Konings,et al.  Light rail in urban regions: what Dutch policymakers could learn from experiences in France, Germany and Japan , 2001 .

[12]  Randal O'Toole Great Rail Disasters: The Impact of Rail Transit on Urban Livability , 2004 .

[13]  C. Hass-Klau,et al.  Economic impact of light rail - the results of 15 urban areas in France, Germany, UK and North America , 2004 .

[14]  S. Schwartz Secrets of Success , 2009 .

[15]  Roger Mackett,et al.  Developing new urban public transport systems: An irrational decision-making process , 1996 .

[16]  D. Pickrell A Desire Named Streetcar Fantasy and Fact in Rail Transit Planning , 1992 .

[17]  Plous A DESIRE NAMED STREETCAR , 1984 .

[18]  Hans de Bruijn,et al.  Management in networks , 2008 .

[19]  Jonathan E. D. Richmond,et al.  A whole-system approach to evaluating urban transit investments , 2001 .