Ambivalence and Unprotected Sex: Failure to Predict Sexual Activity and Decreased Condom Use1

Using a prospective design, we assessed whether ambivalence toward sexual activity is associated with decreased condom use. Undergraduates predicted whether they would have intercourse and use condoms in the next week. A week later, they reported their sexual and contraceptive behavior. Among 65 individuals who had intercourse and planned to use condoms, ambivalence toward sexual activity was negatively associated with condom use. Moreover, whether intercourse was planned mediated the relationship between ambivalence and condom use, such that ambivalence was negatively associated with accuracy in planning sex, and unplanned sex was less likely to be protected. Individuals who are ambivalent about sex may intend to use condoms, but fail to do so because they cannot predict when they will have intercourse.

[1]  M. Rotermann Sex condoms and STDs among young people. , 2005, Health reports.

[2]  L. O’Sullivan,et al.  Feigning sexual desire: Consenting to unwanted sexual activity in heterosexual dating relationships , 1998 .

[3]  C Abraham,et al.  Psychosocial correlates of heterosexual condom use: a meta-analysis. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The generality of the automatic attitude activation effect. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  L. A. Goodman On the Exact Variance of Products , 1960 .

[6]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Structure of natural cognitions. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Belief accessibility and context effects in attitude measurement , 1989 .

[8]  K. Apple,et al.  Pluralistic ignorance and Hooking up , 2003, Journal of sex research.

[9]  A. Smith,et al.  Predictors of heterosexual condom use: Characteristics of the situation are more important than characteristics of the individual , 1999 .

[10]  V. Esses,et al.  Ambivalence and Response Amplification: A Motivational Perspective , 2002 .

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  J. Fisher,et al.  Tests of the mediational role of preparatory safer sexual behavior in the context of the theory of planned behavior. , 2002, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[13]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Cross-Dimension Ambivalence toward Social Groups: Can Ambivalence Affect Intentions to Hire Feminists? , 1998 .

[14]  Mark Conner,et al.  Moderator effects of attitudinal ambivalence on attitude-behaviour relationships , 2002 .

[15]  R. Petty,et al.  Extending the bases of subjective attitudinal ambivalence: interpersonal and intrapersonal antecedents of evaluative tension. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  V. Esses,et al.  Ambivalence and Response Amplification Toward Native Peoples1 , 1997 .

[17]  Mark Conner,et al.  Attitudinal Ambivalence: A Test of Three Key Hypotheses , 2000 .

[18]  Kerstin E. E. Schroder,et al.  Effects of Anonymity, Gender, and Erotophilia on the Quality of Data Obtained from Self-Reports of Socially Sensitive Behaviors , 2002, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[19]  K. Kaplan On the ambivalence-indifference problem in attitude theory and measurement: A suggested modification of the semantic differential technique. , 1972 .

[20]  D. Byrne,et al.  Unwanted teenage pregnancies: incidence, interpretation, and intervention. , 1993, Applied & preventive psychology : journal of the American Association of Applied and Preventive Psychology.

[21]  J. Hyde,et al.  Gender and knowledge about HIV, risky sexual behavior, and safer sex practices. , 1995, Research in nursing & health.

[22]  M. Diehl,et al.  Effects of Attitudinal Ambivalence on Information Processing and Attitude-Intention Consistency☆ , 1997 .

[23]  J. N. Bassili Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. , 1996 .

[24]  C. Muehlenhard,et al.  III. Wanting and Not Wanting Sex: The Missing Discourse of Ambivalence , 2005 .

[25]  W A Fisher,et al.  Changing AIDS-risk behavior. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  M. Zanna,et al.  Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: when and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  W. Fisher Understanding and Preventing Teenage Pregnancy and Sexually Transmitted Disease/AIDS , 1990 .

[28]  L. O’Sullivan,et al.  Decision-Making in College Students' Heterosexual Dating Relationships: Ambivalence about Engaging in Sexual Activity , 1998 .

[29]  B. Flanigan,et al.  Alcohol use, sexual intercourse, and an exploratory study. , 1986, Journal of alcohol and drug education.

[30]  William A. Fisher,et al.  Theoretical Approaches to Individual-Level Change in HIV Risk Behavior , 2000 .

[31]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: a meta-analysis. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  E. Paul,et al.  “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students' spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences , 2000 .

[33]  C. Poulin,et al.  The association between substance use, unplanned sexual intercourse and other sexual behaviours among adolescent students. , 2001, Addiction.

[34]  B. Leigh,et al.  Alcohol consumption and unsafe sexual behavior in discrete events , 1992 .

[35]  R. Petty,et al.  The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  C. Armitage Beyond attitudinal ambivalence: effects of belief homogeneity on attitude-intention-behaviour relations , 2003 .

[37]  Steven J. Breckler,et al.  A Comparison of Numerical Indexes for Measuring Attitude Ambivalence , 1994 .

[38]  A. Smith,et al.  Inconsistent users of condoms: A challenge to traditional models of health behaviour , 2001 .

[39]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  On the Primacy of Affect in the Determination of Attitudes and Behavior: The Moderating Role of Affective-Cognitive Ambivalence , 1998 .

[40]  Mark Conner,et al.  Moderating role of attitudinal ambivalence within the theory of planned behaviour. , 2003, The British journal of social psychology.