Quantitative profiling of protease specificity

Proteases are an important class of enzymes, whose activity is central to many physiologic and pathologic processes. Detailed knowledge of protease specificity is key to understanding their function. Although many methods have been developed to profile specificities of proteases, few have the diversity and quantitative grasp necessary to fully define specificity of a protease, both in terms of substrate numbers and their catalytic efficiencies. We have developed a concept of “selectome”; the set of substrate amino acid sequences that uniquely represent the specificity of a protease. We applied it to two closely related members of the Matrixin family–MMP-2 and MMP-9 by using substrate phage display coupled with Next Generation Sequencing and information theory-based data analysis. We have also derived a quantitative measure of substrate specificity, which accounts for both the number of substrates and their relative catalytic efficiencies. Using these advances greatly facilitates elucidation of substrate selectivity between closely related members of a protease family. The study also provides insight into the degree to which the catalytic cleft defines substrate recognition, thus providing basis for overcoming two of the major challenges in the field of proteolysis: 1) development of highly selective activity probes for studying proteases with overlapping specificities, and 2) distinguishing targeted proteolysis from bystander proteolytic events.

[1]  D. Case,et al.  Exploring protein native states and large‐scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model , 2004, Proteins.

[2]  Oliver Schilling,et al.  Proteome-derived, database-searchable peptide libraries for identifying protease cleavage sites , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[3]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  A Residue in the S2 Subsite Controls Substrate Selectivity of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  A Unique Substrate Recognition Profile for Matrix Metalloproteinase-2* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  A Unique Substrate Binding Mode Discriminates Membrane Type-1 Matrix Metalloproteinase from Other Matrix Metalloproteinases* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[6]  G. Salvesen,et al.  Emerging principles in protease-based drug discovery , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[7]  Pitter F. Huesgen,et al.  Active site specificity profiling datasets of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 12, 13 and 14 , 2016, Data in brief.

[8]  R. Muschel,et al.  Novel MMP-9 Substrates in Cancer Cells Revealed by a Label-free Quantitative Proteomics Approach*S , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[9]  Klaus R. Liedl,et al.  Cleavage Entropy as Quantitative Measure of Protease Specificity , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[10]  A. Cornish-Bowden Enzyme specificity: its meaning in the general case. , 1984, Journal of theoretical biology.

[11]  H. Nishimura Renin-angiotensin system in vertebrates: phylogenetic view of structure and function , 2017, Anatomical Science International.

[12]  S. R. Doren Matrix metalloproteinase interactions with collagen and elastin. , 2015 .

[13]  G. Salvesen,et al.  Synthesis of a HyCoSuL peptide substrate library to dissect protease substrate specificity , 2017, Nature Protocols.

[14]  J. Wells,et al.  Substrate phage: selection of protease substrates by monovalent phage display. , 1993, Science.

[15]  G. Salvesen,et al.  Protease Specificity: Towards In Vivo Imaging Applications and Biomarker Discovery. , 2018, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[16]  J W Smith,et al.  Substrate Hydrolysis by Matrix Metalloproteinase-9* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  Neil D. Rawlings,et al.  The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database , 2017, Nucleic Acids Res..

[18]  Benjamin F. Cravatt,et al.  Functional Interplay between Caspase Cleavage and Phosphorylation Sculpts the Apoptotic Proteome , 2012, Cell.

[19]  D. Green Coagulation cascade , 2006, Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis.

[20]  G. Salvesen,et al.  Small Molecule Active Site Directed Tools for Studying Human Caspases. , 2015, Chemical reviews.

[21]  M. Bogyo,et al.  Synthetic and biological approaches to map substrate specificities of proteases , 2019, Biological chemistry.

[22]  C. Overall,et al.  Multiplex N-terminome Analysis of MMP-2 and MMP-9 Substrate Degradomes by iTRAQ-TAILS Quantitative Proteomics* , 2010, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[23]  C. López-Otín,et al.  The regulatory crosstalk between kinases and proteases in cancer , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[24]  Pitter F. Huesgen,et al.  Active site specificity profiling of the matrix metalloproteinase family: Proteomic identification of 4300 cleavage sites by nine MMPs explored with structural and synthetic peptide cleavage analyses. , 2016, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[25]  C. Simmerling,et al.  ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[26]  Christian Kramer,et al.  Characterizing Protease Specificity: How Many Substrates Do We Need? , 2015, PloS one.

[27]  Benjamin Fabre,et al.  Targeting matrix metalloproteinases: exploring the dynamics of the s1' pocket in the design of selective, small molecule inhibitors. , 2014, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[28]  F. Kondrashov,et al.  Massively parallel enzyme kinetics reveals the substrate recognition landscape of the metalloprotease ADAMTS13 , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  C. Overall,et al.  Metadegradomics , 2008, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[30]  D. Suárez,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of the active matrix metalloproteinase‐2: Positioning of the N‐terminal fragment and binding of a small peptide substrate , 2008, Proteins.

[31]  G. Crooks,et al.  WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. , 2004, Genome research.

[32]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Basis for substrate recognition and distinction by matrix metalloproteinases , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  L. Cantley,et al.  Determination of protease cleavage site motifs using mixture-based oriented peptide libraries , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[34]  K. Oda New families of carboxyl peptidases: serine-carboxyl peptidases and glutamic peptidases. , 2012, Journal of biochemistry.

[35]  C. Craik,et al.  Global substrate specificity profiling of post‐translational modifying enzymes , 2018, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[36]  S. Diamond Methods for mapping protease specificity. , 2007, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[37]  R. A. Leibler,et al.  On Information and Sufficiency , 1951 .

[38]  M. Hochstrasser,et al.  Proteasome Structure and Assembly. , 2017, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  S. Li,et al.  SERPINE2 rs16865421 polymorphism is associated with a lower risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the Uygur population: A case–control study , 2019, The journal of gene medicine.

[40]  A. Dufour,et al.  Proteolytic Cleavage-Mechanisms, Function, and "Omic" Approaches for a Near-Ubiquitous Posttranslational Modification. , 2017, Chemical reviews.

[41]  C. López-Otín,et al.  Protease degradomics: A new challenge for proteomics , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[42]  K. Tomberg,et al.  High throughput protease profiling comprehensively defines active site specificity for thrombin and ADAMTS13 , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[43]  F. Graham,et al.  Characteristics of a human cell line transformed by DNA from human adenovirus type 5. , 1977, The Journal of general virology.

[44]  M. Nishida,et al.  Molecular co-evolution of a protease and its substrate elucidated by analysis of the activity of predicted ancestral hatching enzyme , 2013, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[45]  K. Maskos Crystal structures of MMPs in complex with physiological and pharmacological inhibitors. , 2005, Biochimie.

[46]  C. Heinis,et al.  Identification of target-binding peptide motifs by high-throughput sequencing of phage-selected peptides , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[47]  R. Carrell,et al.  Thrombosis as a conformational disease. , 2005, Haematologica.

[48]  M. Poręba,et al.  Emerging challenges in the design of selective substrates, inhibitors and activity‐based probes for indistinguishable proteases , 2017, The FEBS journal.