The locus of visual-motor learning at the task or manipulator level: implications from intermanual transfer.

To assess the functional locus of visual-motor learning, the computational concepts of "task level" programming (determination of the trajectory of a hand during arm reaching in the Cartesian coordinates) and "manipulator level" programming (determination of the joint coordinates) was adopted. Because the former is likely to be hand nonspecific and the latter is hand specific, it is assumed that learning at the task level should be transferred to the unpracticed hand, whereas that at the manipulator level it should not. Under this assumption, the paradigm of intermanual transfer was used in an aiming task under rotated visual feedback. Nearly 100% intermanual transfer from the practiced hand to the unpracticed hand in the performance time of aiming was found, concluding that the locus of visual-motor learning should be at the task level rather than at the manipulator level.

[1]  C. Bray.  Transfer of learning. , 1928 .

[2]  T. W. Cook.  Studies in cross education: II. Further experiments in mirror tracing the star-shaped maze. , 1933 .

[3]  E. Forward.  Perception and Motion , 1963 .

[4]  M M Cohen,et al.  Continuous versus Terminal Visual Feedback in Prism Aftereffects , 1967, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  C. I. Howarth,et al.  The Movement of the Hand towards a Target , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  M M Cohen.  Visual Feedback, Distribution of Practice, and Intermanual Transfer of Prism Aftereffects , 1973, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[8]  Edward Taub,et al.  Prism Adaptation: Control of Intermanual Transfer by Distribution of Practice , 1973, Science.

[9]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  Levels of sensorimotor representation , 1979 .

[10]  D Goodman,et al.  On the nature of human interlimb coordination. , 1979, Science.

[11]  J. T. Massey,et al.  Spatial trajectories and reaction times of aimed movements: effects of practice, uncertainty, and change in target location. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  E. Bizzi,et al.  Human arm trajectory formation. , 1982, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[13]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[14]  C. Atkeson,et al.  Kinematic features of unrestrained vertical arm movements , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  An algorithm for the generation of curvilinear wrist motion in an arbitrary plane in three-dimensional space , 1986, Neuroscience.

[16]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  Skilled actions: a task-dynamic approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[17]  J. Tanji,et al.  Relation of neurons in the nonprimary motor cortex to bilateral hand movement , 1987, Nature.

[18]  M Kuperstein,et al.  Neural model of adaptive hand-eye coordination for single postures. , 1988, Science.

[19]  Richard A. Andersen,et al.  A back-propagation programmed network that simulates response properties of a subset of posterior parietal neurons , 1988, Nature.

[20]  H. Cunningham.  Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  Sensorimotor representations for pointing to targets in three-dimensional space. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  M. Ito,et al.  Long-term depression. , 1989, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Fundamentals of motor behavior , 1990 .

[24]  H. A. Cunningham,et al.  A vector-sum process produces curved aiming paths under rotated visual-motor mappings , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.