The role of tea parties to elicit technology requirements to support the mobility of older adults

Mobility is fundamental to aging well, maintaining independence and quality of life. Physical mobility is a fundamental component of overall mobility. This paper presents our "technology tea party" methodology. We have used this method to explore older adults' reaction to utilizing different technologies to maintain their mobility, in particular, games consoles to promote exercise at home. At our tea party, participants experienced problems with initially getting started with the console but with minimal support were able to interact with the system and start to explore the benefits they could gain from using such a system. They saw the benefits not only as exercise but also as promoting social interaction. We are now using this method in the design process for an "intelligent" walking aid to improve the ability of older adults to walk around shopping centres. In this paper we advocate the involvement of older adults throughout the design process and we present tea parties as a potential method to use in early stages to elicit requirements.

[1]  Linda Little,et al.  Assessing mobility of successfully ageing adults using new mobility metrics , 2010 .

[2]  S. Webber,et al.  Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework. , 2010, The Gerontologist.

[3]  Peter Gregor,et al.  “User sensitive inclusive design”— in search of a new paradigm , 2000, CUU '00.

[4]  Linda Little,et al.  Exploring patterns of daily physical and sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults. , 2011, Age and ageing.

[5]  J. Barrett,et al.  Running focus groups with elderly and disabled elderly participants. , 2000, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  Michael Caley,et al.  Estimating the future healthcare costs of an aging population in the UK: expansion of morbidity and the need for preventative care. , 2011, Journal of public health.

[7]  Lynn McInnes.  Mapping a mobility profile of the 'oldest-old' survivors of a longitudinal study of ageing , 2010 .

[8]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Dundee user centre: a space where older people and technology meet , 2009, Assets '09.

[9]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[10]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people , 2002, Assets '02.

[11]  C Donlan,et al.  The University of Manchester Age and Cognitive Performance Research Centre and North East Age Research Longitudinal Programmes, 1982 to 1997. , 1993, Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie.

[12]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people , 2004, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[13]  R. Darin Ellis,et al.  Practices to encourage participation of older adults in research and development , 1999, CHI EA '99.

[14]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Design for older and disabled people – where do we go from here? , 2002, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[15]  Gill Whitney,et al.  HCI and the older population , 2008, BCS HCI.

[16]  Patrick Rabbitt,et al.  Do clever brains age more slowly? Further exploration of a nun result. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[17]  P. Diggle,et al.  Practice and drop-out effects during a 17-year longitudinal study of cognitive aging. , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[18]  D. Bouwhuis,et al.  Older adults' motivated choice for technological innovation: evidence for benefit-driven selectivity. , 2006, Psychology and aging.

[19]  Robert Luben,et al.  Combined Impact of Health Behaviours and Mortality in Men and Women: The EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study , 2008, PLoS medicine.