Regional Calibration of SCS-CN L-THIA Model: Application for Ungauged Basins

Estimating surface runoff for ungauged watershed is an important issue. The Soil Conservation Service Curve Number (SCS-CN) method developed from long-term experimental data is widely used to estimate surface runoff from gaged or ungauged watersheds. Many modelers have used the documented SCS-CN parameters without calibration, sometimes resulting in significant errors in estimating surface runoff. Several methods for regionalization of SCS-CN parameters were evaluated. The regionalization methods include: (1) average; (2) land use area weighted average; (3) hydrologic soil group area weighted average; (4) area combined land use and hydrologic soil group weighted average; (5) spatial nearest neighbor; (6) inverse distance weighted average; and (7) global calibration method, and model performance for each method was evaluated with application to 14 watersheds located in Indiana. Eight watersheds were used for calibration and six watersheds for validation. For the validation results, the spatial nearest neighbor method provided the highest average Nash-Sutcliffe (NS) value at 0.58 for six watersheds but it included the lowest NS value and variance of NS values of this method was the highest. The global calibration method provided the second highest average NS value at 0.56 with low variation of NS values. Although the spatial nearest neighbor method provided the highest average NS value, this method was not statistically different than other methods. However, the global calibration method was significantly different than other methods except the spatial nearest neighbor method. Therefore, we conclude that the global calibration method is appropriate to regionalize SCS-CN parameters for ungauged watersheds.

[1]  Keith Beven,et al.  The use of generalised likelihood measures for uncertainty estimation in high order models of environmental systems , 2000 .

[2]  David C. Garen,et al.  CURVE NUMBER HYDROLOGY IN WATER QUALITY MODELING: USES, ABUSES, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS 1 , 2005 .

[3]  Richard H. Hawkins,et al.  Discussion of "Modifications to SCS-CN Method for Long-Term Hydrologic Simulation" , 2010 .

[4]  K. Geetha,et al.  Modifications to SCS-CN Method for Long-Term Hydrologic Simulation , 2007 .

[5]  M. Mosley Delimitation of New Zealand hydrologic regions , 1981 .

[6]  K. Eckhardt How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation , 2005 .

[7]  S. Chapra Surface Water-Quality Modeling , 1996 .

[8]  R. Eli,et al.  Curve Numbers and Urban Runoff Modeling—Application Limitations , 2010 .

[9]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[10]  Keith Lichten,et al.  Low Impact Development 2010 : Redefining Water in the City , 2010 .

[11]  M. Mack HER-Hydrologic evaluation of runoff; the soil conservation service curve number technique as an interactive computer model , 1995 .

[12]  B. Pijanowski,et al.  Forecasting land use change and its environmental impact at a watershed scale. , 2005, Journal of environmental management.

[13]  Gete Zeleke,et al.  Validation of agricultural non-point source (AGNPS) pollution model in Kori watershed, South Wollo, Ethiopia , 2004 .

[14]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model , 2001 .

[15]  S. Grunwalda,et al.  Calibration and validation of a non-point source pollution model , 2000 .

[16]  J. Nicell,et al.  Evaluation of global optimization methods for conceptual rainfall-runoff model calibration , 1997 .

[17]  Jon Harbor,et al.  IMPACTS OF URBANIZATION ON SURFACE HYDROLOGY, LITTLE EAGLE CREEK, INDIANA, AND ANALYSIS OF LTHIA MODEL SENSITIVITY TO DATA RESOLUTION , 2001 .

[18]  Kyoung Jae Lim,et al.  AUTOMATED WEB GIS BASED HYDROGRAPH ANALYSIS TOOL, WHAT 1 , 2005 .

[19]  Kyoung Jae Lim,et al.  EFFECTS OF INITIAL ABSTRACTION AND URBANIZATION ON ESTIMATED RUNOFF USING CN TECHNOLOGY 1 , 2006 .

[20]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization , 1993 .

[21]  Dirk F. Young,et al.  Implementation of a probabilistic curve number method in the PRZM runoff model , 2006, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters , 2005 .

[23]  Thorsten Wagener,et al.  Parameter estimation and regionalization for continuous rainfall-runoff models including uncertainty , 2006 .

[24]  K. Loague,et al.  Statistical and graphical methods for evaluating solute transport models: Overview and application , 1991 .

[25]  G. Kuczera Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models , 1997 .

[26]  Kyoung Jae Lim,et al.  Runoff Impacts of Land-Use Change in Indian River Lagoon Watershed , 2002 .

[27]  Julia A. Jones,et al.  An improved methodology for predicting the daily hydrologic response of ungauged catchments , 1998 .

[28]  G. Vandewiele,et al.  Monthly water balance of ungauged catchments obtained by geographical regionalization , 1995 .

[29]  Minghua Zhang,et al.  A Comparison of the Curve Number and Green-Ampt Models in an Agricultural Watershed , 2013 .

[30]  Jagath J. Kaluarachchi,et al.  Application of parameter estimation and regionalization methodologies to ungauged basins of the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia , 2008 .

[31]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Scale issues in hydrological modelling: A review , 1995 .

[32]  Andrea Petroselli,et al.  Curve‐Number/Green–Ampt mixed procedure for streamflow predictions in ungauged basins: Parameter sensitivity analysis , 2013 .

[33]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[34]  Andrea Petroselli,et al.  Green‐Ampt Curve‐Number mixed procedure as an empirical tool for rainfall–runoff modelling in small and ungauged basins , 2013 .

[35]  J. Arnold,et al.  AUTOMATED METHODS FOR ESTIMATING BASEFLOW AND GROUND WATER RECHARGE FROM STREAMFLOW RECORDS 1 , 1999 .

[36]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models , 1994 .