The evolutionary dynamics of language

The well-established framework of evolutionary dynamics can be applied to the fascinating open problems how human brains are able to acquire and adapt language and how languages change in a population. Schemas for handling grammatical constructions are the replicating unit. They emerge and multiply with variation in the brains of individuals and undergo selection based on their contribution to needed expressive power, communicative success and the reduction of cognitive effort. Adopting this perspective has two major benefits. (i) It makes a bridge to neurobiological models of the brain that have also adopted an evolutionary dynamics point of view, thus opening a new horizon for studying how human brains achieve the remarkably complex competence for language. And (ii) it suggests a new foundation for studying cultural language change as an evolutionary dynamics process. The paper sketches this novel perspective, provides references to empirical data and computational experiments, and points to open problems.

[1]  Luc Steels,et al.  How to play the Syntax Game , 2015, ECAL.

[2]  Guido Boella,et al.  Normative framework for normative system change , 2009, AAMAS 2009.

[3]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[4]  Noam Chomsky.  Some notes on economy of derivation and representation , 2013 .

[5]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World , 1994 .

[6]  Mirjam Fried,et al.  Principles of Constructional Change , 2013 .

[7]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[8]  L. Steels.  Modeling the cultural evolution of language. , 2011, Physics of life reviews.

[9]  Jinyong Lee,et al.  Template Construction Grammar: From Visual Scene Description to Language Comprehension and Agrammatism , 2013, Neuroinformatics.

[10]  Michael Spranger.  Evolving Grounded Spatial Language Strategies , 2013, KI - Künstliche Intelligenz.

[11]  T. Kohonen.  Self-organized formation of topographically correct feature maps , 1982 .

[12]  A. Goldberg.  Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language , 2006 .

[13]  Angelo Cangelosi,et al.  Simulating the Evolution of Language , 2002, Springer London.

[14]  Stefan Th. Gries,et al.  Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions , 2003 .

[15]  J. Vonk.  Gorilla (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) and orangutan (Pongo abelii) understanding of first- and second-order relations , 2003, Animal Cognition.

[16]  G. Edelman.  Neural Darwinism: The Theory Of Neuronal Group Selection , 1989 .

[17]  William Croft,et al.  Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective , 2001 .

[18]  Tao Gong,et al.  A simulation study on word order bias , 2009 .

[19]  Luc Steels,et al.  A Vector Representation of Fluid Construction Grammar Using Holographic Reduced Representations , 2015, EAPCogSci.

[20]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Bootstrapping the Mind: Analogical Processes and Symbol Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[21]  Timothy Colleman,et al.  Constructional semantics on the move: On semantic specialization in the English double object construction , 2011 .

[22]  N. K. Jerne,et al.  THE NATURAL-SELECTION THEORY OF ANTIBODY FORMATION. , 1955, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Lan Shuai,et al.  Studying Language Change Using Price Equation and Pólya-urn Dynamics , 2012, PloS one.

[24]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  The Problems Of Biology , 1986 .

[25]  D. Bickerton.  Language and Species , 1990 .

[26]  David Poeppel,et al.  Towards a New Neurobiology of Language , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Freek Van de Velde,et al.  Left-peripheral expansion of the English NP1 , 2011, English Language and Linguistics.

[28]  Michela Cennamo,et al.  Argument structure in flux , 2013 .

[29]  Charles J. Fillmore,et al.  The Mechanisms of “Construction Grammar” , 1988 .

[30]  M. Kimura,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 1983, Scientific American.

[31]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction , 1999, Computational Linguistics.

[32]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Neuronal Replicator Hypothesis , 2010, Neural Computation.

[33]  Tao Gong,et al.  Simulating the coevolution of compositionality and word order regularity , 2011 .

[34]  Jason Gray.  Adam's Tongue , 2002 .

[35]  W. D. Mulder,et al.  The grammaticalization of definite articles , 2011 .

[36]  M. Eigen.  Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules , 1971, Naturwissenschaften.

[37]  E. Jablonka,et al.  Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life , 2005 .

[38]  J. Changeux.  Neuronal man : the biology of mind , 1985 .

[39]  Luc Steels,et al.  Fluid construction grammar as a biological system , 2016 .

[40]  Derek C. Penn,et al.  Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds , 2008, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[41]  M. Tomasello.  Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition , 2003 .

[42]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  First Language Acquisition , 2002, The Study of Language.

[43]  Merav Parter,et al.  Facilitated Variation: How Evolution Learns from Past Environments To Generalize to New Environments , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[44]  Trevor Bekolay,et al.  Neural representations of compositional structures: representing and manipulating vector spaces with spiking neurons , 2011, Connect. Sci..

[45]  Benjamin K. Bergen,et al.  Embodied Construction Grammar in Simulation-Based Language Understanding , 2003 .

[46]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  The Major Transitions in Evolution , 1997 .

[47]  Marcello Barbieri,et al.  Code Biology – A New Science of Life , 2012, Biosemiotics.

[48]  Daniel Van Olmen,et al.  Describing and explaining the variation of Bantu imperatives and prohibitives , 2013 .

[49]  Michael A. Arbib,et al.  Précis of How the brain got language: The Mirror System Hypothesis , 2012, Language and Cognition.

[50]  Anna Smirnova,et al.  Crows Spontaneously Exhibit Analogical Reasoning , 2015, Current Biology.

[51]  Simon Kirby,et al.  Syntax as an adaptation to the learner. , 2009 .

[52]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  Linguistic Evolution through Language Acquisition: Formal and Computational Models. , 2002 .

[53]  Luc Steels,et al.  Multilevel Alignment Maintains Language systematicity , 2012, Adv. Complex Syst..

[54]  Martin Hilpert,et al.  Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation, and Syntax , 2013 .

[55]  E. Szathmáry.  Toward major evolutionary transitions theory 2.0 , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  Breeding novel solutions in the brain: a model of Darwinian neurodynamics , 2016, F1000Research.

[57]  M. Tomasello.  First Verbs: A Case Study of Early Grammatical Development , 1994 .

[58]  L. Steels,et al.  Agent-Based Models of Strategies for the Emergence and Evolution of Grammatical Agreement , 2013, PloS one.

[59]  Laura A. Michaelis.  Sign-based Construction Grammar , 2015 .

[60]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  A. Friederici.  The cortical language circuit: from auditory perception to sentence comprehension , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[62]  Remi van Trijp.  Linguistic Assessment Criteria for Explaining Language Change: A Case Study on Syncretism in German Definite Articles , 2013 .

[63]  Luc Steels,et al.  Usage-based Grammar Learning as Insight Problem Solving , 2015, EAPCogSci.

[64]  Hendrik De Smet,et al.  On multiple source constructions in language change , 2015 .

[65]  Eörs Szathmáry,et al.  An evolutionary perspective on the systems of adaptive immunity , 2018, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.