Who are the international research collaboration partners for China? A novel data perspective based on NSFC grants

International research collaboration is vital to the success of scientific development of China, and the identification of collaboration partners is the basic unit of collaboration. While many researchers have investigated international research collaboration using publication data, grant data have rarely been used. This paper explores the international research collaboration partners of China from a new data perspective, based on grant data. Using data from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) joint grants between China and 75 countries from 2006 to 2016, this study examines the collaboration partners in three aspects: overall collaboration activity, relative research effort, and collaboration groups of countries. Some interesting results are obtained as follows. Among 75 partners, the top 15 account for 95.42% of the total grants, but they are quite uneven in collaborating grant numbers and shares. The USA ranks far ahead of the others with a share of 53.27%, but China maintained a steady, approximately average collaborative effort with it from 2006 to 2016. China shows a growing preference for collaborating with Australia, the Netherlands, and Spain, while the preferences for Japan, Germany, and Sweden are the opposite. The collaborative number of grants among five collaboration groups varies greatly because of different features of constituents’ countries. The G7 and Asia–Pacific both own more than 75% of all the grants, while the BRICS and “The Belt and Road” are relatively weak in research collaboration, but China has maintained a rising trend of collaboration with them over the past 11 years.

[1]  Corinne Autant-Bernard,et al.  Determinants of cross-regional R&D collaboration: some empirical evidence from Europe in biotechnology , 2014 .

[2]  Olle Persson,et al.  The measurement of international scientific collaboration , 1993, Scientometrics.

[3]  Ugo Finardi.  Scientific collaboration between BRICS countries , 2014, Scientometrics.

[4]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Recent Developments in China–U.S. Cooperation in Science , 2014, 1404.6545.

[5]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  An overview of academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany , 2014, Scientometrics.

[6]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future , 2001, Scientometrics.

[7]  TangLi,et al.  China---US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology , 2011 .

[8]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact , 1986, Scientometrics.

[9]  Jiang Li,et al.  Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences , 2015, Scientometrics.

[10]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Publication indicators of relative research efforts in physics subfields , 1983, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[11]  Li Tang,et al.  China's Global Growth in Social Science Research: Uncovering Evidence from Bibliometric Analyses of SSCI Publications (1978–2013) , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[12]  Yuh-Shan Ho,et al.  Comparison of independent research of China’s top universities using bibliometric indicators , 2012, Scientometrics.

[13]  B. Everitt,et al.  Cluster Analysis: Everitt/Cluster Analysis , 2011 .

[14]  Stefanie Haustein,et al.  Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia–Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view? , 2011, Scientometrics.

[15]  Lili Wang,et al.  The structure and comparative advantages of China’s scientific research: quantitative and qualitative perspectives , 2015, Scientometrics.

[16]  José Luis Ortega,et al.  Collaboration patterns in patent networks and their relationship with the transfer of technology: the case study of the CSIC patents , 2011, Scientometrics.

[17]  Junping Qiu,et al.  Network structure, distribution and the growth of Chinese international research collaboration , 2013, Scientometrics.

[18]  Stefanie Haustein,et al.  The life sciences in German–Chinese cooperation: an institutional-level co-publication analysis , 2013, Scientometrics.

[19]  Thomas Scherngell,et al.  Towards an integrated European Research Area? Findings from Eigenvector spatially filtered spatial interaction models using European Framework Programme data , 2012 .

[20]  Ugo Finardi,et al.  Scientific collaboration framework of BRICS countries: an analysis of international coauthorship , 2016, Scientometrics.

[21]  M. Barber,et al.  Distinct spatial characteristics of industrial and public research collaborations: evidence from the fifth EU Framework Programme , 2010, 1004.3685.

[22]  Brian Everitt,et al.  Cluster analysis , 1974 .

[23]  Xianwen Wang,et al.  Network structure of scientific collaborations between China and the EU member states , 2017, Scientometrics.

[24]  Dengsheng Wu,et al.  An analysis of international research collaboration based on research project data , 2017, ISSI.

[25]  Qingjun Zhao,et al.  International collaboration of three ‘giants’ with the G7 countries in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals , 2011, Scientometrics.

[26]  Patrice Laget,et al.  Intra-EU vs. extra-EU scientific co-publication patterns in EU , 2008, Scientometrics.

[27]  Ping Zhou,et al.  Academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany in physics , 2015, Scientometrics.

[28]  Jungwon Yoon,et al.  The normalization of co-authorship networks in the bibliometric evaluation: the government stimulation programs of China and Korea , 2016, Scientometrics.

[29]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Publication activity, citation impact and bi-directional links between publications and patents in biotechnology , 2011, Scientometrics.

[30]  Zhenzhong Ma,et al.  Booming or emerging? China's technological capability and international collaboration in patent activities , 2009 .

[31]  Jianping Li,et al.  A comparison of 17 article-level bibliometric indicators of institutional research productivity: Evidence from the information management literature of China , 2017, Inf. Process. Manag..

[32]  Erjia Yan,et al.  Predicting and recommending collaborations: An author-, institution-, and country-level analysis , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[33]  Wei Yang,et al.  Policy: Boost basic research in China , 2016, Nature.

[34]  A. D. Gordon.  A Review of Hierarchical Classification , 1987 .

[35]  Chuanli Wang,et al.  International scientific collaboration of China: collaborating countries, institutions and individuals , 2012, Scientometrics.

[36]  Ping Zhou,et al.  A bibliometric investigation on China–UK collaboration in food and agriculture , 2012, Scientometrics.

[37]  K. C. Garg,et al.  A study of collaboration in laser science and technology , 2001, Scientometrics.

[38]  R. Tijssen,et al.  Research collaboration at a distance: Changing spatial patterns of scientific collaboration within Europe , 2010 .

[39]  ZhouPing,et al.  Academic publishing and collaboration between China and Germany in physics , 2015 .

[40]  Olle Persson,et al.  Studying research collaboration using co-authorships , 1996, Scientometrics.

[41]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[42]  Jianping Li,et al.  Ranking the research productivity of business and management institutions in Asia–Pacific region: empirical research in leading ABS journals , 2015, Scientometrics.

[43]  Jianping Li,et al.  Journal editorship index for assessing the scholarly impact of academic institutions: An empirical analysis in the field of economics , 2018, J. Informetrics.

[44]  Cassidy R. Sugimoto,et al.  Institutional interactions: Exploring social, cognitive, and geographic relationships between institutions as demonstrated through citation networks , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[45]  Xianwen Wang,et al.  The role of Chinese–American scientists in China–US scientific collaboration: a study in nanotechnology , 2012, Scientometrics.

[46]  Suresh Kumar,et al.  Scientometrics of computer science research in India and China , 2005, Scientometrics.

[47]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Reflections on the activity index and related indicators , 2012, J. Informetrics.

[48]  Tianwei He,et al.  International scientific collaboration of China with the G7 countries , 2009, Scientometrics.

[49]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The European Union, China, and the United States in the top-1% and top-10% layers of most-frequently cited publications: Competition and collaborations , 2014, J. Informetrics.

[50]  Albert C.T. Li.  Beyond Competition: Past, Present and Future on EU-China Science and Technology Collaboration. , 2014 .

[51]  Li Tang,et al.  China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: patterns and dynamics , 2011, Scientometrics.

[52]  B.M. Gupta,et al.  India's Collaboration with People's Republic of China in Science & Technology: A Scientometric Analysis of Coauthored Papers During 1996-2000 , 2003 .

[53]  Cui Zhang,et al.  China’s international research collaboration: evidence from a panel gravity model , 2017, Scientometrics.

[54]  Li Tang,et al.  Does "birds of a feather flock together" matter - Evidence from a longitudinal study on US-China scientific collaboration , 2013, J. Informetrics.

[55]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Scandinavia: A Bibliometric Approach , 2004, Scientometrics.

[56]  Suresh Kumar,et al.  Scientometric profile of Indian agricultural research as seen through Science Citation Index Expanded , 2006, Scientometrics.

[57]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  In-depth analysis on China’s international cooperation in science , 2010, Scientometrics.

[58]  S. M. Dhawan,et al.  India's collaboration with People's Republic of China in Science and Technology: A scientometric analysis of coauthored papers during 1994-1999 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[59]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  The F-measure for Research Priority , 2018, J. Data Inf. Sci..

[60]  Dimitris Assimakopoulos,et al.  Evolution of regional scientific collaboration networks: China-Europe emerging collaborations on nano-science , 2013, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[61]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Is China also becoming a giant in social sciences? , 2007, Scientometrics.