The Vowel Systems of Quichua-Spanish Bilinguals

This study investigates vowel productions of 20 Quichua-Spanish bilinguals, differing in age of Spanish acquisition, and 5 monolingual Spanish speakers. While the vowel systems of simultaneous, early, and some mid bilinguals all showed significant plasticity, there were important differences in the kind, as well as the extent, of this adaptability. Simultaneous bilinguals dffered from early bilinguals in that they were able to partition the vowel space in a more fine-grained way to accommodate the vowels of their two languages. Early and some mid bilinguals acquired Spanish vowels, whereas late bilinguals did not. It was also found that acquiring Spanish vowels could affect the production of native Quichua vowels. The Quichua vowels were produced higher by bilinguals who had acquired Spanish vowels than those who had not. It is proposed that this vowel reorganization serves to enhance the perceptual distinctiveness between the vowels of the combined first- and second-language system.

[1]  James Emil Flege,et al.  Cross-language switching in stop consonant perception and production by Dutch speakers of english , 1987, Speech Commun..

[2]  C. Best,et al.  Discrimination of non-native consonant contrasts varying in perceptual assimilation to the listener's native phonological system. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Uriel Weinreich,et al.  On the Description of Phonic Interference , 1957 .

[4]  S. F. Disner.  Vowel quality : the relation between universal and language specific factors , 1983 .

[5]  J. Werker.  Becoming A Native Listener , 1989 .

[6]  E. Zurif,et al.  The acquisition of a new phonological contrast: the case of stop consonants in French-English bilinguals. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Flege,et al.  Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers , 1987 .

[8]  L Williams,et al.  The modification of speech perception and production in second-language learning , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Albert Costa,et al.  First and second language vowel perception in early bilinguals , 2000 .

[10]  L. Williams,et al.  The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals , 1977 .

[11]  P. Kuhl.  Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect” for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Byunggon Yang.  A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers , 1996 .

[13]  M. Chee,et al.  Mandarin and English Single Word Processing Studied with Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  B. Lindblom.  Phonetic Universals in Vowel Systems , 1986 .

[15]  Reiko Akahane-Yamada,et al.  Perceptual assimilation of american English vowels by Japanese listeners , 1996, ICSLP.

[16]  H. Traunmüller.  Analytical expressions for the tonotopic sensory scale , 1990 .

[17]  A. Jongman,et al.  The Acoustic Vowel Space of Modern Greek and German , 1989, Language and speech.

[18]  M. E. H. Schouten.  Imitation of Synthetic Vowels by Bilinguals. , 1977 .

[19]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Einar Haugen,et al.  Bilingualism in the Americas: A Bibliography and Research Guide , 1958 .

[21]  Catherine T. Best,et al.  Emergence of Language-Specific Constraints in Perception of Non-Native Speech: A Window on Early Phonological Development , 1993 .

[22]  C. Fowler,et al.  Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English , 1997 .

[23]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Vowel Quality Systems: The Role of Perceptual Contrast , 1972 .

[24]  Joy Hirsch,et al.  Distinct cortical areas associated with native and second languages , 1997, Nature.

[25]  David Birdsong,et al.  Second language acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. , 1999 .

[26]  T. M. Nearey.  Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  C. Best.  A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception , 1995 .

[28]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Self-organizing processes and the explanation of phonological universals , 1983 .

[29]  S. Soto-Faraco,et al.  Online processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in early bilinguals , 1999, Cognition.

[30]  Antonio Méndez.  Production of American English and Spanish Vowels , 1982 .

[31]  Gary H. Glover,et al.  Convergent Cortical Representation of Semantic Processing in Bilinguals , 1999, Brain and Language.

[32]  P. Kuhl.  A new view of language acquisition. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Bart de Boer,et al.  Self-organization in vowel systems , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[34]  Cross-Language Influence on the Production of Mandarin /f/ and /x/ and Taiwanese /h/ by Native Speakers of Taiwanese Amoy , 1993, Phonetica.

[35]  John W. Oller,et al.  THE CONTRASTIVE ANALYSIS HYPOTHESIS AND SPELLING ERRORS , 1970 .

[36]  B. Lindblom,et al.  In what sense is speech quantal , 1989 .

[37]  J. Flege,et al.  An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: the case of Japanese adults' perception of English consonants. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  Christian Abry,et al.  Major trends in vowel system inventories , 1997 .

[39]  F. Fazio,et al.  Brain processing of native and foreign languages , 1996, NeuroImage.

[40]  H. Fujisaki,et al.  The roles of pitch and higher formants in the perception of vowels , 1968 .

[41]  A. Bradlow,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  J. Schwartz,et al.  The Dispersion-Focalization Theory of vowel systems , 1997 .

[43]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[44]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Voice onset time in two French dialects , 1974 .

[45]  M. Anisfeld,et al.  Cross-influences between the phonological systems of Lithuanian-English bilinguals , 1969 .

[46]  J. Flege.  The production of "new" and "similar" phones in a foreign language: evidence for the effect of equivalence classification , 1987 .

[47]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[48]  François Grosjean,et al.  Life with Two Languages , 2019, A Journey in Languages and Cultures.

[49]  K. Stevens,et al.  Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. , 1992, Science.

[50]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Functional neural subsystems are differentially affected by delays in second language immersion: ERP and behavioral evidence in bilinguals. , 1999 .

[51]  R. Lado,et al.  Linguistics Across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for Language Teachers , 1957 .

[52]  Ocke-Schwen Bohn,et al.  The Production of New and Similar Vowels by Adult German Learners of English , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[53]  Robert P. Stockwell,et al.  The sounds of English and Spanish , 1958 .

[54]  C. Best,et al.  Examination of perceptual reorganization for nonnative speech contrasts: Zulu click discrimination by English-speaking adults and infants. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  V. Hazan,et al.  Perception and Production of a Voicing Contrast by French-English Bilinguals , 1993 .

[56]  Ronald Wardhaugh.  The Contrastive Analysis Hypothesis. , 1970 .

[57]  J. Hillenbrand,et al.  Limits on phonetic accuracy in foreign language speech production , 1984 .

[58]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Brain responses reveal the learning of foreign language phonemes. , 1999, Psychophysiology.