Acute Kidney Injury With Buffered Crystalloids vs Saline Among ICU Patients.

meaning of FDA approval. Physicians tended to overestimate the minimum evidence of efficacy required of new drugs. Similarly, many misinterpreted the term breakthrough—believing these drugs were supported by stronger evidence than required by the statute. Our results are limited by social desirability and other inherent survey response biases and may not be generalizable beyond internists and medical specialists. The misconceptions identified may lead physicians to overprescribe newly approved drugs—particularly breakthrough therapies— and inadequately communicate how well these drugs work to the patients who will use them.

[1]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Hydroxyethyl Starch or Saline for Fluid Resuscitation in Intensive Care. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Effect of a Buffered Crystalloid Solution vs Saline on Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: The SPLIT Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2015, JAMA.

[3]  J. Kellum,et al.  Assessing Toxicity of Intravenous Crystalloids in Critically Ill Patients. , 2015, JAMA.

[4]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Overview of the study protocols and statistical analysis plan for the Saline versus Plasma-Lyte 148 for Intravenous Fluid Therapy (SPLIT) research program. , 2015, Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine.

[5]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Cluster randomised crossover trials with binary data and unbalanced cluster sizes: Application to studies of near-universal interventions in intensive care , 2015, Clinical trials.

[6]  C. Schermer,et al.  Meta-analysis of high- versus low-chloride content in perioperative and critical care fluid resuscitation , 2014, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  R. Bellomo,et al.  A protocol for the 0.9% saline versus Plasma-Lyte 148 for intensive care fluid therapy (SPLIT) study. , 2014, Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine.

[8]  D. Lobo,et al.  Choice of fluid in acute illness: what should be given? An international consensus. , 2014, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  J. Butterworth,et al.  Should "normal" saline be our usual choice in normal surgical patients? , 2013, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  M. Grocott,et al.  Perioperative buffered versus non-buffered fluid administration for surgery in adults. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[11]  Ognjen Gajic,et al.  Risk Factors for Development of Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies , 2012, Critical care research and practice.

[12]  A. Abu-Hanna,et al.  A comparison of RIFLE with and without urine output criteria for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients , 2012, Critical Care.

[13]  Michael Bailey,et al.  Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults. , 2012, JAMA.

[14]  R. Mehta,et al.  Defining urine output criterion for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. , 2011, Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association.

[15]  Michael L. Bentley,et al.  Drug-induced acute kidney injury in the critically ill adult: Recognition and prevention strategies , 2010, Critical care medicine.

[16]  Jonathan Himmelfarb,et al.  Fluid accumulation, recognition and staging of acute kidney injury in critically-ill patients , 2010, Critical care.

[17]  R. Bellomo,et al.  Acute renal failure – definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group , 2004, Critical care.