When Less Is More: Integrating Technical Writing Instruction

Providing technical writing instruction within a large, first-year engineering course involves both logistical and imaginative challenges but can also yield substantive results. In the fall of 2003, the University of Maine initiated a new plan, called the Engineering Communication Project (ECP), to integrate technical writing instruction throughout the College of Engineering curricula. Civil Engineering Materials Laboratory (CIE 111) was the first course to incorporate the new plan. CIE 111 is a 1-credit laboratory component of a basic course in civil engineering materials, incorporating topics in material variability, plastics, metals, wood and concrete. Historically, students produced five full academic lab reports during the semester, with less than satisfactory results for the most part. Recent enrollment growth (to around 100 students) introduced further complication. The new ECP approach replaced the academic lab reports with five case-based memo assignments, which allowed for more specific instructional goals, more meaningful feedback to students and a reduced paper-reading load for engineering faculty. Specific goals for the memo assignments included learning memo format, and developing COPE writing skills (Clarity, Organization, Precision and Economy). The ECP is a cooperative effort between the Department of English and the College of Engineering and is supported by a grant from the Davis Educational Foundation. In summary, each engineering department will use alumni and faculty surveys to develop core competencies in technical communication. Departments will then integrate those competencies in appropriate courses throughout the curricula, with guidance from English department faculty. William Manion and David Adams describe the design and implementation of this assignment regimen and use examples for illustration. Manion and Adams also discuss some of the issues encountered and present initial assessments of the effort.