Long-term angiographic results of stenting in chronic total occlusions: influence of stent design and vessel size.

BACKGROUND Although coronary stenting has decreased the high restenosis rate associated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of chronic total occlusions (CTOs), the results are still less satisfactory than those found in nonoccluded lesions, at least as reported with the Palmaz-Schatz stent. The present work compares the restenosis rate of other stent designs with that of the Palmaz-Schatz stent. METHODS We studied the long-term angiographic outcome of 120 CTOs successfully recanalized with balloon-expandable stents and without concomitant debulking techniques. Angiographic follow-up and full quantitative coronary angiography analysis was prospectively performed in all patients. Three different stent designs were compared: Palmaz-Schatz (n = 47), coil (n = 24), and multicellular (n = 49). Particular attention was paid to their performance in vessels of 3 mm or less and greater than 3 mm in diameter. Restenosis was defined as a 50% or greater diameter stenosis at follow-up. RESULTS Multicellular stents were implanted more frequently in the left anterior descending artery and in patients with multivessel disease. No other significant differences in clinical or angiographic baseline characteristics, including vessel size, were noted between groups. At follow-up, multicellular stents presented a lower restenosis rate (22% vs 36% and 58% in the Palmaz-Schatz and coil stent groups, respectively; P =.01 ) and larger minimal luminal diameters (1.92 +/- 0.85 mm vs 1.73 +/- 0.98 and 1.38 +/- 0.83 mm in the Palmaz-Schatz and coil stent groups, respectively; P = 0.0). The superiority of the multicellular stent design resulted from a lower restenosis rate in vessels of 3.0 mm or less in diameter (20% vs 47% and 79% in the Palmaz-Schatz and coil stent groups, respectively; P =.006). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that the restenosis rate after stent recanalization of CTOs is influenced by both stent design and vessel size and may indicate a superiority of multicellular over Palmaz-Schatz and coil stent designs for this purpose.

[1]  P. Serruys,et al.  Short- and long-term clinical and quantitative angiographic results with the new, less shortening Wallstent for vessel reconstruction in chronic total occlusion: a quantitative angiographic study. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  P. Serruys,et al.  Influence of Coronary Vessel Size on Renarrowing Process and Late Angiographic Outcome After Successful Balloon Angioplast , 1994, Circulation.

[3]  E. Topol,et al.  Major clinical events after coronary stenting. The multicenter registry of acute and elective Gianturco-Roubin stent placement. The Gianturco-Roubin Intracoronary Stent Investigator Group. , 1994, Circulation.

[4]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Randomised comparison of implantation of heparin-coated stents with balloon angioplasty in selected patients with coronary artery disease (Benestent II) , 1998, The Lancet.

[5]  W. Edwards,et al.  Histologic correlates of angiographic chronic total coronary artery occlusions: influence of occlusion duration on neovascular channel patterns and intimal plaque composition. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  B. Rosner,et al.  Lesion-to-lesion independence of restenosis after treatment by conventional angioplasty, stenting, or directional atherectomy. Validation of lesion-based restenosis analysis. , 1993, Circulation.

[7]  E. Edelman,et al.  Endovascular stent design dictates experimental restenosis and thrombosis. , 1995, Circulation.

[8]  T. Hayashi,et al.  Comparison of results of intracoronary implantation of the Plamaz-Schatz stent with conventional balloon angioplasty in chronic total coronary arterial occlusion. , 1996, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  B. Meier Total coronary occlusion: a different animal? , 1991, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  M. Leon,et al.  Small stent size and intimal hyperplasia contribute to restenosis: a volumetric intravascular ultrasound analysis. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  K. Endresen,et al.  Stenting in Chronic Coronary Occlusion (SICCO): a randomized, controlled trial of adding stent implantation after successful angioplasty. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  R E Vlietstra,et al.  Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Y. Ikari,et al.  Luminal loss and site of restenosis after Palmaz-Schatz coronary stent implantation. , 1995, The American journal of cardiology.

[14]  Patrick W. Serruys,et al.  Handbook of Coronary Stents , 1997 .

[15]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Intracoronary stent insertion after balloon angioplasty of chronic total occlusions. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  C. McCabe,et al.  Initial success and long-term follow-up of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in chronic total occlusions versus conventional stenoses. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  U. Sigwart Ten Years Of Stenting: What Next? , 1997 .

[18]  H. Harasaki,et al.  Effects of stent design and serum cholesterol level on the restenosis rate in atherosclerotic rabbits. , 1993, American heart journal.

[19]  P. Teirstein,et al.  Restenosis After Placement of Palmaz‐Schatz Stents in Native Coronary Arteries: Initial Results of a Multicenter Experience , 1992, Circulation.

[20]  C M Gibson,et al.  Generalized model of restenosis after conventional balloon angioplasty, stenting and directional atherectomy. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  C. Wong,et al.  Distal coronary artery perforation resulting from the use of hydrophilic coated guidewire in tortuous vessels. , 1998, Catheterization and cardiovascular diagnosis.