Argument Mapper: Countering Cognitive Biases in Analysis with Critical (Visual) Thinking

Humans are vulnerable to cognitive biases such as neglect of probability, framing effect, confirmation bias, conservatism (belief revision) and anchoring. Argument Mapper addresses these biases in intelligence analysis by providing an easy-to-use, theoretically sound, web-based interactive software tool that enables the application of evidence-based reasoning to analytic questions. Designed in collaboration with analytic methodologists, this tool combines structured argument mapping methodology with visualization techniques to help analysts make sense of complex problems and overcome cognitive biases. The tool uses Baconian probability and conjunctive logic to automatically calculate the inferential force on the upper level hypothesis. Evaluations with 16 analysts showed the tool was easy to use and easy to understand.

[1]  T. Das,et al.  Cognitive Biases and Strategic Decision Processes: An Integrative Perspective , 1999 .

[2]  D. T. Moore.  Critical Thinking and Intelligence Analysis , 2007 .

[3]  David Arnott,et al.  Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: a design science approach , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[4]  Alexander W. Skaburskis,et al.  The Sandbox for analysis: concepts and methods , 2006, CHI.

[5]  Richards J. Heuer,et al.  Psychology of Intelligence Analysis , 1999 .

[6]  J. Richards,et al.  The Art and Science of Intelligence Analysis , 2010 .

[7]  Tim van Gelder,et al.  The rationale for Rationale , 2007 .

[8]  Martin Edman.  The Probable and the Provable , 1980 .

[9]  Gheorghe Tecuci,et al.  Computational approach and cognitive assistant for evidence-based reasoning in intelligence analysis , 2014, Int. J. Intell. Def. Support Syst..

[10]  David A. Schum,et al.  Assessing the Competence and Credibility of Human Sources of Intelligence Evidence: Contributions from Law and Probability , 2007 .

[11]  Richards J. Heuer,et al.  Structured Analytic Techniques for Intelligence Analysis , 2014 .

[12]  Gheorghe Tecuci,et al.  Cognitive Assistants for Evidence-Based Reasoning Tasks , 2011, AAAI Fall Symposium: Advances in Cognitive Systems.

[13]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[14]  Alberto J. Cañas,et al.  A TEORIA SUBJACENTE AOS MAPAS CONCEITUAIS E COMO ELABORÁ-LOS E USÁ-LOS * THE THEORY UNDERLYING CONCEPT MAPS AND HOW TO CONSTRUCT AND USE THEM , 2010 .

[15]  Niels Pinkwart,et al.  Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning DOI 10.1007/s11412-009-9080-x Computer-supported argumentation: A review of the state of the art , 2009 .

[16]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[17]  Robert R. Hoffman,et al.  Gaming Technology for Critical Thinking , 2014 .

[18]  D. Schum.  The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning , 1994 .

[19]  Gheorghe Tecuci,et al.  COGENT: Cognitive Agent for Cogent Analysis , 2015, AAAI Fall Symposia.

[20]  L. Cohen.  An Introduction To The Philosophy Of Induction And Probability , 1989 .

[21]  S. Keeley,et al.  Asking the right questions : a guide to critical thinking , 2010 .