Stereotype Threat and the Student‐Athlete

Achievement gaps may reflect the cognitive impairment thought to occur in evaluative settings (e.g., classrooms) where a stereotyped identity is salient (i.e., stereotype threat). This study presents an economic model of stereotype threat that reconciles prior evidence on how student effort and performance are influenced by this social-identity phenomenon. This study also presents empirical evidence from a laboratory experiment in which students at a selective college were randomly assigned to a treatment that primed their awareness of a stereotyped identity (i.e., student-athlete). This treatment reduced the test-score performance of athletes relative to non-athletes by 14 percent (effect size = -1.0).

[1]  David H. Reiley,et al.  What Happens in the Field Stays in the Field: Exploring Whether Professionals Play Minimax in Laboratory Experiments , 2009 .

[2]  Jenessa R. Shapiro,et al.  The Role of Gender Identities and Stereotype Salience With the Academic Performance of Male and Female College Athletes , 2009 .

[3]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Financial Incentives on Stereotype Threat: Evidence from a Pilot Study , 2008 .

[4]  J. Jackson,et al.  Athletic Identity, Racial Attitudes, and Aggression in First Year Black and White Intercollegiate Athletes , 2002 .

[5]  N. Ambady,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance , 1999 .

[6]  Rachel E. Kranton,et al.  Identity and Schooling: Some Lessons for the Economics of Education , 2002 .

[7]  Richard D. Harvey,et al.  Hostile environments, stereotype threat, and math performance among undergraduate women , 2000 .

[8]  J. Tirole,et al.  Identity, morals, and taboos: beliefs as assets. , 2011, The quarterly journal of economics.

[9]  James L. Shulman,et al.  The Game of Life: College Sports and Educational Values , 2000 .

[10]  David H. Reiley,et al.  What Happens in the Field Stays in the Field: Professionals Do Not Play Minimax in Laboratory Experiments , 2010 .

[11]  Hanming Fang,et al.  "Dysfunctional Identities" Can Be Rational , 2005 .

[12]  Gary A. Sailes.  An investigation of campus stereotypes: the myth of black athletic superiority and the dumb jock stereotype. , 1993 .

[13]  Robert J. Oxoby,et al.  Social Interactions and the Salience of Social Identity , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Economics and Identity , 2000 .

[15]  Jean Tirole,et al.  Identity, Dignity and Taboos: Beliefs as Assets , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[16]  J. Fleming,et al.  The dimensionality of self-esteem. II: Hierarchical facet model for revised measurement scales , 1984 .

[17]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Am I an Athlete or a Student? Identity Salience and Stereotype Threat in Student–Athletes , 2005 .

[18]  W. Bowen,et al.  Reclaiming the Game: College Sports and Educational Values , 2003, Ever the Leader.

[19]  G. Harrison,et al.  Field experiments , 1924, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[20]  S. Harkins,et al.  Mere effort and stereotype threat performance effects. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  Viewpoint: On the Generalizability of Lab Behaviour to the Field , 2007 .

[22]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Reducing the Racial Achievement Gap: A Social-Psychological Intervention , 2006, Science.

[23]  George A. Akerlof,et al.  Identity and the Economics of Organizations , 2005 .

[24]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  Stereotypes and the fragility of academic competence, motivation, and self-concept , 2005 .

[25]  J. Heckman,et al.  Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences , 2009, Science.

[26]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Steven D. Levitt,et al.  What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preferences Reveal About the Real World , 2007 .