Using Regionalized Air Quality Model Performance and Bayesian Maximum Entropy data fusion to map global surface ozone concentration

Estimates of ground-level ozone concentrations have been improved through data fusion of observations and atmospheric chemistry models. Our previous global ozone estimates for the Global Burden of Disease study corrected for bias uniformly across continents and then corrected near monitoring stations using the Bayesian Maximum Entropy (BME) framework for data fusion. Here, we use the Regionalized Air Quality Model Performance (RAMP) framework to correct model bias over a much larger spatial range than BME can, accounting for the spatial inhomogeneity of bias and nonlinearity as a function of modeled ozone. RAMP bias correction is applied to a composite of 9 global chemistry-climate models, based on the nearest set of monitors. These estimates are then fused with observations using BME, which matches observations at measurement stations, with the influence of observations declining with distance in space and time. We create global ozone maps for each year from 1990 to 2017 at fine spatial resolution. RAMP is shown to create unrealistic discontinuities due to the spatial clustering of ozone monitors, which we overcome by applying a weighting for RAMP based on the number of monitors nearby. Incorporating RAMP before BME has little effect on model performance near stations, but strongly increases R2 by 0.15 at locations farther from stations, shown through a checkerboard cross-validation. Corrections to estimates differ based on location in space and time, confirming heterogeneity. We quantify the likelihood of exceeding selected ozone levels, finding that parts of the Middle East, India, and China are most likely to exceed 55 parts per billion (ppb) in 2017. About 96% of the global population was exposed to ozone levels above the World Health Organization guideline of 60 µg m−3 (30 ppb) in 2017. Our annual fine-resolution ozone estimates may be useful for several applications including epidemiology and assessments of impacts on health, agriculture, and ecosystems.

[1]  M. Schultz,et al.  Global, high-resolution mapping of tropospheric ozone – explainable machine learning and impact of uncertainties , 2022, Geoscientific Model Development.

[2]  Yuming Guo,et al.  Spatial Resolved Surface Ozone with Urban and Rural Differentiation during 1990-2019: A Space-Time Bayesian Neural Network Downscaler. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Daniel C. Anderson,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability in the hydroxyl (OH) radical: understanding the role of large-scale climate features and their influence on OH through its dynamical and photochemical drivers , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[4]  Elyssa L. Collins,et al.  Mapping Yearly Fine Resolution Global Surface Ozone through the Bayesian Maximum Entropy Data Fusion of Observations and Model Output for 1990-2017. , 2021, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  Stephen B. Reid,et al.  Estimating Wildfire Smoke Concentrations during the October 2017 California Fires through BME Space/Time Data Fusion of Observed, Modeled, and Satellite-Derived PM2.5. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  P. J. Young,et al.  Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report , 2020, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene.

[7]  M. Schultz,et al.  IntelliO3-ts v1.0: A neural network approach to predict near-surface ozone concentrations in Germany , 2020 .

[8]  Yuzhong Zhang,et al.  Rapid Increases in Warm-Season Surface Ozone and Resulting Health Impact in China Since 2013 , 2020, Environmental Science & Technology Letters.

[9]  D. Shindell,et al.  Magnitude, trends, and impacts of ambient long-term ozone exposure in the United States from 2000 to 2015 , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[10]  L. Oman,et al.  Global changes in the diurnal cycle of surface ozone , 2019, Atmospheric Environment.

[11]  Mohammad Hosein Farzaei,et al.  Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017 , 2018, Lancet.

[12]  M. Schultz,et al.  Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report : Present-day ozone distribution and trends relevant to human health , 2018 .

[13]  Jessica L. Neu,et al.  Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report:Assessment of global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions, variability, and trends , 2018 .

[14]  Antonella Zanobetti,et al.  Association of Short-term Exposure to Air Pollution With Mortality in Older Adults , 2017, JAMA.

[15]  Irina Petropavlovskikh,et al.  Regional trend analysis of surface ozone observations from monitoring networks in eastern North America, Europe and East Asia , 2017 .

[16]  S. Dhomse,et al.  Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) , 2017 .

[17]  N. Reid,et al.  Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: Database and Metrics Data of Global Surface Ozone Observations , 2017 .

[18]  J. Lamarque,et al.  AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6 , 2016 .

[19]  Daniel Krewski,et al.  Long-Term Ozone Exposure and Mortality in a Large Prospective Study. , 2016, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[20]  W. Vizuete,et al.  Bayesian Maximum Entropy Integration of Ozone Observations and Model Predictions: A National Application. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  J. Frostad,et al.  Ambient Air Pollution Exposure Estimation for the Global Burden of Disease 2013. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Global Distribution and Trends of Tropospheric Ozone: An Observation-Based Review , 2014 .

[23]  Saravanan Arunachalam,et al.  Bayesian maximum entropy integration of ozone observations and model predictions: an application for attainment demonstration in North Carolina. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[24]  K. Wyat Appel,et al.  Evaluation of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model version 4.5 : Sensitivities impacting model performance Part I-Ozone , 2007 .

[25]  Armistead G Russell,et al.  Nonlinear response of ozone to emissions: source apportionment and sensitivity analysis. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  F. Dominici,et al.  Ozone and short-term mortality in 95 US urban communities, 1987-2000. , 2004, JAMA.

[27]  Alexander Kolovos,et al.  Total ozone mapping by integrating databases from remote sensing instruments and empirical models , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  W. Vizuete,et al.  Regionalized PM2.5 Community Multiscale Air Quality model performance evaluation across a continuous spatiotemporal domain. , 2017, Atmospheric environment.

[29]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Effects of subgrid segregation on ozone production efficiency in a chemical model , 2000 .

[30]  Marc L. Serre,et al.  Modern geostatistics: computational BME analysis in the light of uncertain physical knowledge – the Equus Beds study , 1999 .