The contributory effects of supervisor intentions on subordinate feedback responses

Abstract The purpose of this study was to investigate the contributory effects of perceived supervisor intentions on subordinate reactions, motivation to improve, and feedback seeding behavior when a supervisor provides informal feedback. One hundred eighty-four participants responded to scenarios within the context of their current work situations in which feedback sign (positive/negative), supervisor feedback giving behavioral style (effective/ineffective), and supervisor intentions (constructive/mixed/nonconstructive) were manipulated in a 2 × 2 × 3 factorial design. The results provided further support for the impact of feedback sign and supervisor behavior on subordinate feedback reactions and responses. Intention perceptions interacted with feedback sign to affect feedback reactions and, as a main effect, significantly contributed to the variance explained for each of the three dependent variables. These results are discussed in terms of their implications for the feedback process and suggestions are offered for future research on subordinate reactions and responses to supervisor feedback.

[1]  Charles A. O'Reilly,et al.  Trust and the Communication of Performance Appraisal Information: The Effect of Feedback on Performance and Job Satisfaction , 1980 .

[2]  Glenn A. Bassett,et al.  Performance appraisal based on self-review. , 1968 .

[3]  Ronald J. Burke,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT INTERVIEWS: REPLICATION AND EXTENSION , 1978 .

[4]  L. Pondy,et al.  Toward an "Intent" Model of Conflict Management Among Principal Parties , 1977 .

[5]  Herbert H. Meyer,et al.  Split Roles in Performance Appraisal , 1981 .

[6]  Susan J. Ashford,et al.  Proactive feedback seeking: The instrumental use of the information environment , 1985 .

[7]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  FEEDBACK AS AN INDIVIDUAL RESOURCE: PERSONAL STRATEGIES OF CREATING INFORMATION , 1983 .

[8]  R. Burke,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF EFFECTIVE EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT INTERVIEWS , 1969 .

[9]  J. R. Larson The performance feedback process: A preliminary model , 1984 .

[10]  B. Bannister,et al.  Performance outcome feedback and attributional feedback: interactive effects on recipient responses , 1986 .

[11]  Hal G. Gueutal,et al.  The effects of feedback sequence and expertise of the rater on perceived feedback accuracy. , 1984 .

[12]  Gerald L. Wilson,et al.  The performance appraisal interview: An interpretive reassessment , 1986 .

[13]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Exploring the Dimensionality of Managers' Performance Feedback to Subordinates , 1986 .

[14]  G. Yukl,et al.  Subordinate personality as a moderator of the effects of participation in three types of appraisal interviews. , 1973 .

[15]  Kevin R. Murphy,et al.  Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluation. , 1978 .

[16]  Douglas Cederblom The Performance Appraisal Interview: A Review, Implications, and Suggestions , 1982 .

[17]  Martin M. Greller,et al.  The Nature of Subordinate Participation in the Appraisal Interview , 1978 .

[18]  K. Giffin The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. , 1967, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  M. Ronald Buckley,et al.  Providing feedback to organizational members: A reconsideration , 1987 .

[20]  M. Taylor,et al.  Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. , 1979 .

[21]  Martin M. Greller,et al.  Sources of feedback: A preliminary investigation , 1975 .

[22]  C. R. Snyder,et al.  Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. , 1976, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  S. Silverman,et al.  REACTION OF EMPLOYEES TO PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL INTERVIEWS AS A FUNCTION OF THEIR PARTICIPATION IN RATING SCALE DEVELOPMENT , 1984 .

[24]  Richard B. Peterson,et al.  Supervisor and subordinate reactions to performance appraisal sessions , 1981 .

[25]  M. Greller Subordinate participation and reactions to the appraisal interview. , 1975 .