MEG/EEG group study with MNE: recommendations, quality assessments and best practices

Cognitive neuroscience questions are commonly tested with experiments that involve a cohort of subjects. The cohort can consist of a handful of subjects for small studies to hundreds or thousands of subjects in open datasets. While there exist various online resources to get started with the analysis of magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG) data, such educational materials are usually restricted to the analysis of a single subject. This is in part because data from larger group studies are harder to share, but also analyses of such data are often require subject-specific decisions which are hard to document. This work presents the results obtained by the reanalysis of an open dataset from Wakeman and Henson (2015) using the MNE software package. The analysis covers preprocessing steps, quality assurance steps, sensor space analysis of evoked responses, source localization, and statistics in both sensor and source space. Results with possible alternative strategies are presented and discussed at different stages such as the use of high-pass filtering versus baseline correction, tSSS versus SSS, the use of a minimum norm inverse versus LCMV beamformer, and the use of univariate or multivariate statistics. This aims to provide a comparative study of different stages of M/EEG analysis pipeline on the same dataset, with open access to all of the scripts necessary to reproduce this analysis.

[1]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python , 2013, Front. Neuroinform..

[2]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  Grand average ERP-image plotting and statistics: A method for comparing variability in event-related single-trial EEG activities across subjects and conditions , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  W. Krieg Functional Neuroanatomy , 1953, Springer Series in Experimental Entomology.

[4]  Joshua Carp,et al.  The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature , 2012, NeuroImage.

[5]  J.C. Mosher,et al.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data , 1992, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Seppo P. Ahlfors,et al.  Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates , 2006, NeuroImage.

[7]  S. Luck,et al.  How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Erich Schröger,et al.  High-pass filters and baseline correction in M/EEG analysis-continued discussion , 2016, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Multilevel (Hierarchical) Modeling: What It Can and Cannot Do , 2006, Technometrics.

[10]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[12]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Filter Effects and Filter Artifacts in the Analysis of Electrophysiological Data , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[13]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[14]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Neurotechnique Mapping: Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000 .

[15]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  MEG-BIDS: an extension to the Brain Imaging Data Structure for magnetoencephalography , 2017 .

[16]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  MEG beamforming using Bayesian PCA for adaptive data covariance matrix regularization , 2011, NeuroImage.

[17]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience , 2013, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  Systematic biases in early ERP and ERF components as a result of high-pass filtering , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  Emmanuel Ifeachor,et al.  Digital Signal Processing: A Practical Approach , 1993 .

[20]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Does Filtering Preclude Us from Studying ERP Time-Courses? , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[21]  J. Ioannidis Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[22]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Characterizing the dynamics of mental representations: the temporal generalization method , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  Richard N Henson,et al.  A multi-subject, multi-modal human neuroimaging dataset , 2015, Scientific Data.

[24]  Nathaniel J. Smith,et al.  Regression-based estimation of ERP waveforms: II. Nonlinear effects, overlap correction, and practical considerations. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  EEG and MEG Data Analysis in SPM8 , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[26]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[27]  Nathaniel J. Smith,et al.  Regression-based estimation of ERP waveforms: I. The rERP framework. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[28]  Tristan Glatard,et al.  Reproducibility of neuroimaging analyses across operating systems , 2015, Front. Neuroinform..

[29]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  OpenfMRI: Open sharing of task fMRI data , 2017, NeuroImage.

[30]  Martin Luessi,et al.  MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[31]  Joshua Carp,et al.  On the Plurality of (Methodological) Worlds: Estimating the Analytic Flexibility of fMRI Experiments , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[32]  J Gross,et al.  REPRINTS , 1962, The Lancet.

[33]  Alexandre Gramfort,et al.  Autoreject: Automated artifact rejection for MEG and EEG data , 2016, NeuroImage.

[34]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  D. Cohen,et al.  Note: Magnetic noise from the inner wall of a magnetically shielded room. , 2013, The Review of scientific instruments.

[36]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  MEG/EEG Source Reconstruction, Statistical Evaluation, and Visualization with NUTMEG , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[37]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Digital filter design for electrophysiological data – a practical approach , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[38]  Tom Eichele,et al.  Semi-automatic identification of independent components representing EEG artifact , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[39]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Reducing multi-sensor data to a single time course that reveals experimental effects , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[40]  Kensuke Sekihara,et al.  Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction , 2005, NeuroImage.

[41]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  The brain imaging data structure, a format for organizing and describing outputs of neuroimaging experiments , 2016, Scientific Data.

[42]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature , 2017, PLoS biology.

[43]  Alexandre Gramfort,et al.  Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals , 2015, NeuroImage.

[44]  S. Taulu,et al.  Spatiotemporal signal space separation method for rejecting nearby interference in MEG measurements , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[45]  S. Debener,et al.  Primary somatosensory contextual modulation is encoded by oscillation frequency change , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[46]  Kendrick Kay,et al.  The Functional Neuroanatomy of Human Face Perception. , 2017, Annual review of vision science.

[47]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Signal-space projection method for separating MEG or EEG into components , 1997, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[48]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Extended ICA Removes Artifacts from Electroencephalographic Recordings , 1997, NIPS.

[49]  E. Halgren,et al.  Dynamic Statistical Parametric Mapping Combining fMRI and MEG for High-Resolution Imaging of Cortical Activity , 2000, Neuron.

[50]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[51]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[52]  M. Scherg,et al.  Two bilateral sources of the late AEP as identified by a spatio-temporal dipole model. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[53]  Sylvain Baillet,et al.  Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[54]  Joachim Gross,et al.  Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research , 2013, NeuroImage.

[55]  Eric Larson,et al.  The cortical dynamics underlying effective switching of auditory spatial attention , 2013, NeuroImage.

[56]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[57]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[58]  Olaf Hauk,et al.  Comparison of noise-normalized minimum norm estimates for MEG analysis using multiple resolution metrics , 2011, NeuroImage.

[59]  Donald B. Percival,et al.  Spectral Analysis for Physical Applications , 1993 .

[60]  Kenneth Kreutz-Delgado,et al.  Hierarchical Event Descriptor (HED) tags for analysis of event-related EEG studies , 2013, 2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing.

[61]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Thresholding of Statistical Maps in Functional Neuroimaging Using the False Discovery Rate , 2002, NeuroImage.

[62]  Maureen Clerc,et al.  Graph-Based Variability Estimation in Single-Trial Event-Related Neural Responses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[63]  Stefan Haufe,et al.  On the interpretation of weight vectors of linear models in multivariate neuroimaging , 2014, NeuroImage.

[64]  Jens Haueisen,et al.  Time-frequency mixed-norm estimates: Sparse M/EEG imaging with non-stationary source activations , 2013, NeuroImage.

[65]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[66]  R. Leahy,et al.  EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[67]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis , 1999, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[68]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB, SIFT, NFT, BCILAB, and ERICA: New Tools for Advanced EEG Processing , 2011, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[69]  A. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate System , 1999, NeuroImage.

[70]  Eric Larson,et al.  Mind the Noise Covariance When Localizing Brain Sources with M/EEG , 2015, 2015 International Workshop on Pattern Recognition in NeuroImaging.

[71]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface Reconstruction , 1999, NeuroImage.

[72]  Guillaume Gibert,et al.  xDAWN Algorithm to Enhance Evoked Potentials: Application to Brain–Computer Interface , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[73]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Threshold-free cluster enhancement: Addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference , 2009, NeuroImage.

[74]  D. Slepian Prolate spheroidal wave functions, fourier analysis, and uncertainty — V: the discrete case , 1978, The Bell System Technical Journal.

[75]  Uwe Pietrzyk,et al.  Integration of Amplitude and Phase Statistics for Complete Artifact Removal in Independent Components of Neuromagnetic Recordings , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[76]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.

[77]  H H Donaldson,et al.  LOCALIZATION IN THE BRAIN. , 1884, Science.

[78]  Pavan Ramkumar,et al.  Feature-Specific Information Processing Precedes Concerted Activation in Human Visual Cortex , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[79]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.