Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning

This study investigated the impact of different modes of scaffolding on students who are learning science through a web-based collaborative inquiry project in authentic classroom settings and explored the interaction effects with students' characteristics. The intervention study aimed to improve domain-specific knowledge and metacognitive awareness during online information problem solving (IPS) as part of an online inquiry project. Three experimental conditions (teacher-enhanced scaffolding, technology-enhanced scaffolding, and both forms of scaffolding) were compared with a control condition in a two-by-two factorial quasi-experimental design. Moreover, gender and prior knowledge were examined as two factors which may have a significant impact on Web-based learning. In a four-week field study in secondary science education, pretest-posttest differences were measured. In total 347 students from 18 secondary school classes were involved and the classes were randomly distributed over the 4 conditions. Our findings support the notion of multiple scaffolding as an approach to enhance both knowledge acquisition and metacognitive awareness with respect to IPS-processes and to meet a mix of students with different needs within the context of a web-based inquiry learning project.

[1]  Ard W. Lazonder,et al.  Do two heads search better than one? Effects of student collaboration on web search behaviour and search outcomes , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[2]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[3]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Web-based interaction: A review of three important human factors , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[5]  David Miller,et al.  The role of individual differences in Internet searching: an empirical study , 2001 .

[6]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[7]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Learning from Learning Kits: gStudy Traces of Students’ Self-Regulated Engagements with Computerized Content , 2006 .

[8]  Daniel C. Moos,et al.  Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? , 2008 .

[9]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Synergy Between Teacher Practices and Curricular Scaffolds to Support Students in Using Domain-Specific and Domain-General Knowledge in Writing Arguments to Explain Phenomena , 2009 .

[10]  Lev Vygotsky.  Mind in society , 1978 .

[11]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  WISE design for knowledge integration , 2003 .

[12]  V. Aleven,et al.  Help Seeking and Help Design in Interactive Learning Environments , 2003 .

[13]  Xiaobin Huang,et al.  Gender differences in the online reading environment , 2008, J. Documentation.

[14]  Jamshid Beheshti,et al.  Gender differences in collaborative Web searching behavior: an elementary school study , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  S. Puntambekar,et al.  Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed? , 2005 .

[16]  N. van Schooten.  Ondersteunen van planningsactiviteiten tijdens het zoeken van informatie op het web , 2008 .

[17]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[18]  Douglas N. Gordin,et al.  Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. , 2000, The Future of children.

[19]  Ioannis Stamelos,et al.  The effect of scaffolding students' context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[20]  B. Crawford.  Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers , 2000 .

[21]  Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al.  Seeking Meaning: a process approach to library and information services" Ablex Publishing , 2003 .

[22]  Joshua Radinsky,et al.  Adaptive human guidance of computer-mediated group work , 2010 .

[23]  Robert Platt,et al.  Case-Based Learning , 2010, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning.

[24]  Raya Fidel,et al.  A Visit to the Information Mall: Web Searching Behavior of High School Students , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[25]  Roy,et al.  The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning , Education , and Human Activity , 2004 .

[26]  Annemarie Hauf,et al.  Computers in education , 1983 .

[27]  Michael B. Eisenberg,et al.  Information Problem Solving: The Big Six Skills Approach to Library & Information Skills Instruction. , 1990 .

[28]  Els Kuiper,et al.  Developing Web literacy in collaborative inquiry activities , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[29]  J. Flavell.  Metacognitive aspects of problem solving , 1976 .

[30]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. , 1997 .

[31]  Allyson F. Hadwin,et al.  Designing roles, scripts, and prompts to support CSCL in gStudy , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Christof Wecker,et al.  Fading instructional scripts: preventing relapses into novice strategies by distributed monitoring , 2010, ICLS.

[33]  J. Kolodner,et al.  Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design , 2005 .

[34]  Rainer Bromme,et al.  Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models , 2007, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[35]  Carol Midgley,et al.  Avoiding Seeking Help in the Classroom: Who and Why? , 2001 .

[36]  Christof Wecker,et al.  Computer literacy and inquiry learning: when geeks learn less , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[37]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Metacognitive theories , 1995 .

[38]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  The Myth of Over-scripting: Can Novices be Supported Too Much? , 2011 .

[39]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? q , 2004 .

[40]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Adaptable Scripting in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Foster Knowledge and Skill Acquisition , 2011 .

[41]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[42]  Joachim Wirth.  Promoting Self-Regulated Learning Through Prompts , 2009 .

[43]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Characterizing the influence of domain expertise on web search behavior , 2009, WSDM '09.

[44]  Alex Koohang,et al.  Learners' Perceptions toward the Web-based Distance Learning Activities/Assignments Portion of an Undergraduate Hybrid Instructional Model , 2003, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[45]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[46]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  Information problem solving instruction: Some cognitive and metacognitive issues , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[47]  Marcia C. Linn,et al.  WISE Science: Web-Based Inquiry in the Classroom , 2009 .

[48]  Naomi Miyake,et al.  Explorations of Scaffolding in Complex Classroom Systems , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[49]  M. Chi,et al.  Gender Differences in Patterns of Searching the Web , 2003 .

[50]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? , 2002 .

[51]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching , 2006 .

[52]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based Scaffolds , 2005 .

[53]  D. Tabatabai,et al.  How experts and novices search the Web , 2005 .

[54]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Collaboration and abstract representations: towards predictive models based on raw speech and eye-tracking data , 2009, CSCL.

[55]  N. Rummel,et al.  Learning to Collaborate: An Instructional Approach to Promoting Collaborative Problem Solving in Computer-Mediated Settings , 2005 .

[56]  Ard W. Lazonder,et al.  Minimalist Instruction for Learning to Search the World Wide Web , 2001, Education and Information Technologies.

[57]  Gerry Stahl,et al.  Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL2011 Conference Proceedings , 2011 .

[58]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Review of: Kuhlthau, Carol Collier. Seeking meaning: a process approach to library and information services. 2nd. ed. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited, 2004 , 2004, Inf. Res..

[59]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Assessing metacognitive awareness , 1994 .

[60]  A. W. Lazonder.  Exploring novice users' training needs in searching information on the WWW , 2000, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[61]  Saskia Brand-Gruwel,et al.  A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[62]  A. Zohar,et al.  The effects of explicit teaching of metastrategic knowledge on low- and high-achieving students☆ , 2008 .

[63]  Iris Tabak,et al.  Synergy: A Complement to Emerging Patterns of Distributed Scaffolding , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.