A Comparison of NGA Ground-Motion Prediction Equations to Italian Data

Abstract Ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) have recently been developed in the Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) project for application to shallow crustal earthquakes in tectonically active regions. We investigate the compatibility of those models with respect to magnitude scaling, distance scaling, and site scaling implied by Italian strong motion data. This is of interest because (1) the Italian data are principally from earthquakes in extensional regions that are poorly represented in the NGA dataset, and (2) past practice in Italy has been to use local GMPEs based on limited datasets that cannot resolve many significant source, path, and site effects. We find that the magnitude scaling implied by the Italian data is compatible with four NGA relations. However, the Italian data attenuate faster than implied by the four NGAGMPEs at short periods; the differences are statistically significant. Comparison with the fifth one was not possible because it was developed for rock conditions only. Three regression coefficients are reevaluated for the four NGAGMPEs to reflect the faster attenuation: a constant term, a term controlling the slope of distance attenuation, and a source fictitious depth term. The scaling of ground motion with respect to site shear wave velocity is consistent between the NGA models and Italian data. Moreover, the data are found to contain a nonlinear site effect that is generally compatible with NGA site terms. The intraevent scatter of Italian data is higher than in the NGA models, although interevent scatter is comparable to NGA recommendations when the faster distance attenuation is considered. On the basis of these findings, we recommend using the NGA relations, with the aforementioned minor modifications, to evaluate ground motions for seismic hazard analysis in Italy.

[1]  N. A. Abrahamson,et al.  A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  D. Wells,et al.  New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement , 1994, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  F. Sabetta,et al.  Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  J. Bommer,et al.  PREDICTION OF HORIZONTAL RESPONSE SPECTRA IN EUROPE , 1996 .

[5]  Robert J. Budnitz,et al.  Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Guidance on uncertainty and use of experts , 1997 .

[6]  Luca Malagnini,et al.  Attenuation and excitation of three-component ground motion in southern California , 1999 .

[7]  Luca Malagnini,et al.  Ground-Motion Scaling in the Region of the 1997 Umbria-Marche Earthquake (Italy) , 2000 .

[8]  Luca Malagnini,et al.  Ground-Motion Scaling in the Apennines (Italy) , 2000 .

[9]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  Earthquake Ground Motion and Response Spectra , 2001 .

[10]  John Douglas,et al.  USE OF ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE FOR THE INVESTIGATION OF REGIONAL DEPENDENCE OF STRONG GROUND MOTIONS , 2002 .

[11]  Lucia Luzi,et al.  Site Response of Strong Motion Stations in the Umbria, Central Italy, Region , 2004 .

[12]  John Douglas,et al.  An investigation of analysis of variance as a tool for exploring regional differences in strong ground motions , 2004 .

[13]  F. Scherbaum,et al.  On the Use of Response Spectral-Reference Data for the Selection and Ranking of Ground-Motion Models for Seismic-Hazard Analysis in Regions of Moderate Seismicity: The Case of Rock Motion , 2004 .

[14]  J. Douglas,et al.  Equations for the Estimation of Strong Ground Motions from Shallow Crustal Earthquakes Using Data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal Peak Ground Acceleration and Spectral Acceleration , 2005 .

[15]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Orientation-Independent Measures of Ground Motion , 2006 .

[16]  J. Douglas Errata of and additions to `Ground motion estimation equations mbox1964--mbox2003' , 2006 .

[17]  J. Bommer,et al.  Relationships between Median Values and between Aleatory Variabilities for Different Definitions of the Horizontal Component of Motion , 2006 .

[18]  K. Campbell Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) empirical ground motion models : Can they be used in Europe , 2006 .

[19]  J. Douglas,et al.  Errata of and additions to 'Ground motion es timation equations 1964-2003' , 2006 .

[20]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Criteria for Selecting and Adjusting Ground-Motion Models for Specific Target Regions: Application to Central Europe and Rock Sites , 2006 .

[21]  J. Bommer,et al.  Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East , 2007 .

[22]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Empirical Prediction Equations for Peak Ground Velocity Derived from Strong-Motion Records from Europe and the Middle East , 2007 .

[23]  K. Campbell Campbell-Bozorgnia NGA Ground Motion Relations for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of Peak and Spectral Ground Motion Parameters , 2007 .

[24]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA Ground-Motion Relations , 2008 .

[25]  BrianS-J. Chiou,et al.  An NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra , 2008 .

[26]  I. M. Idriss An NGA Empirical Model for Estimating the Horizontal Spectral Values Generated by Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 2008 .

[27]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s , 2008 .

[28]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  An evaluation of the applicability of the NGA models to ground-motion prediction in the Euro-Mediterranean region , 2008 .

[29]  K. Campbell,et al.  NGA Ground Motion Model for the Geometric Mean Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% Damped Linear Elastic Response Spectra for Periods Ranging from 0.01 to 10 s , 2008 .

[30]  G. Lanzo,et al.  Critical evaluation of Italian strong motion data and comparison to NGA ground motion prediction equations , 2008 .

[31]  Robert B. Herrmann,et al.  High-Frequency Ground-Motion Scaling in the Pacific Northwest and in Northern and Central California , 2008 .

[32]  Nick Gregor,et al.  NGA Project Strong-Motion Database , 2008 .

[33]  Giuseppe Di Capua,et al.  Preliminary Report on the Seismological and Geotechnical Aspects of the April 6 2009 L'Aquila Earthquake in Central Italy (Version 2.0); ; GEER Association Report; , 2009 .

[34]  Jonathan P. Stewart,et al.  Database for Earthquake Strong Motion Studies in Italy , 2009 .

[35]  A. Rovelli,et al.  Do Strike-Slip Faults of Molise, Central–Southern Italy, Really Release a High Stress? , 2010 .